Jump to content
SAU Community

EXIT

Members
  • Posts

    174
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by EXIT

  1. chaos, He doesn't have to show or prove that this company does it all the time - he's merely relaying what happened to him on a particular occasion. If I went to Hungry Jack's, got lousy service and a hamburger that looked like a dog's breakfast as opposed to the one depicted on their menu display, why shouldn't I be able to write and complain about that ??? HJ's cannot sue anyone for that. If I phoned Tel$tra to enquire about why I cannot get ADSL and then got a very rude response and unhelpful back from them, why shouldn't I be able to write about that ? In fact, I have done so and nothing ever came of it. As a matter of fact, there are a number of Australian IT forums around where people regularly complain about Telstra, Optus, iiNet and other companies and no-one has ever been sued. Nor will they.
  2. Ah yes, they get sued for DEFAMATION: In other words, they get sued for writing something that is falsified/incorrect and injures the reputation of the other party. For example, Tom Cruise sued a newspaper (I think) for writing an article about him being homosexual. He's not gay, he won the case, and rightly so. Now if he WAS gay then he would have no legal grounds to stand on because the newspaper was merely reporting a fact. Similarly, if I write an article saying company XYZ in Sydney is shit and imply something which is not true, they could sue me for slander/defamation (if they could prove that they lost business as a direct result of my actions) . If what I was saying was TRUE however, they could not. It is not slander/libel or defamatory in any way. I am merely reporting a FACT. This is an imprtant distinction. Hence I still stand by my opinion that if someone was ripped off by some company, they have the legal right to post their name to a public forum. If someone knows of ANY case where a website has been sued for reporting a FACT, please post it and correct me if I am wrong. (In that case, michaelmoore.com should long have gone out of business!!!)
  3. Why would naming a company expose SAU to liability ? Is SAU a registered business entity or company ? As far as I can tell, the domain name was registered by Christian Biggins (i.e. just an individual, not a company). How can he possibly be held accountable for anything that is posted on a *public* forum ? There are zillions of boards around, heck I'm even the admin for one I set up for a highschool reunion. Are you saying that I am now responsible for the content that is posted by my old highschool friends ? If someone here has had problems/got ripped off by some company, shouldn't they have the same right to name that company as, say, the Current Affair TV programme ? All they are saying is that "hey, I went to company XXX and they did this to me". It's not libel, slander or defamatory remarks - just the facts. Now, I'm NOT a lawyer and I do not claim to know all the legal ins and outs of liability issues etc., so my post here is just my opinion on the matter. I'd welcome input from other board members with a legal background or who know FOR A FACT that one cannot name a company on a public board in a negative context. We should really clear this up and have the legal know-how/backing because I think it would be useful to be able to post the names of companies that have ripped off fellow members to protect others. Companies who are offended or disagree with a post made by someone can post a rebuttal/defense on this board. It is, after all, public...
  4. I'm hoping to buy an import sports car soon and am basically considering either a Skyline or a 300ZX TT. Has anyone in here ever owned both cars ? If so, how would you rate them in terms of performace and reliability ? Are there any particular bad points/things to watch out for in either of these beasts ? Cheers, EXIT :confused:
  5. Hehe... true, but I think that particular Viper's V10 engine (which has a rather nice turbo running at 15PSI + NOS!!!) would pretty much leave the ol' 'line behind. :uh-huh: The 1000HP dyno-sheet is also rather impressive...
  6. ...I want one of these !!! :burnout:
  7. 20 (in Hex)
  8. Goddammit, I nearly got killed this morning on the way to work by one of those massive heavy-haulage support trucks that ran a red light. Was sitting at the lights on Karel Ave, waiting to turn left onto Leach Hwy. Our lights went green and I was about to drive off when one of those huge trucks that can carry containers etc. comes thundering past (on Leach Hwy) about two metres in front of me. I slam on the brakes and about another one or two seconds later the little support truck with the "wide load" signs and amber flashing lights zooms past. Mother Fuc*er!!! Their lights turned red about 5 seconds ago!! Had I taken off in a more spirited manner, I would have been history. Have these guys got no brains at all ? They weren't even carrying a load, so they could quite easily have stopped but instead they decided to just treat red lights as "traffic suggestions" and run straight through them. To make matters worse, I followed them down Leach (I was heading to the Freeway on-ramp) and the same pair of trucks ran another set of reds near the freeway bridge. Where are the cops when you need them! (too busy giving out speeding tickets to people going 65 in 60 zones I guess). GRRRRRR!!!
  9. There seem to be quite a few "high performance" oils available these days and also spark plugs with funky new features, so I was just wondering which engine oils and spark plugs are best for Skylines (and turbo-charged cars in general). Anyone got any recommendations ? Cheers, EXIT
  10. Found the following article for ya! Source: © The Indiana Observer www.IndianaObserver.com --- Early in the evolution of automobiles, engines, and gasoline, engine “knock”, “pinging”, became a problem. It is also referred to as “detonation”, “pre-ignition”, “spark knock”, “valve noise”, and other terms, misnomers or not. If the gasoline in an engine burns (combusts) prematurely (in terms of mere milliseconds), or combusts spontaneously, or too rapidly, or too violently, it is inferior combustion, and makes a pinging or rattling noise from the engine, usually when accelerating. Severe pinging can quickly destroy an engine. Chronic mild pinging can eventually result in serious damage to an engine. A sturdy engine can withstand occasional light pinging, though maybe with slightly accelerated wear on certain parts. When any pinging occurs, efficiency and power are reduced, and fuel consumption is increased. Put simply, pinging is not good. In the 1920s, gasoline companies began offering a new, improved, and slightly more expensive type of gasoline that resisted pinging, knock. The new gasoline contained an “anti-knock” additive, a chemical called tetraethyl lead, “TEL”, that actually made gasoline slightly “reluctant” to burn, which helped to remedy inferior combustion, “pinging”. The more TEL that was added to gasoline, the more knock-resistant the gasoline became. The manufacturer of TEL, who supplied it to the gasoline companies, was the Ethyl Corporation. Gasoline that contained the most TEL, that (thus) was the most knock resistant, was widely referred to as “ethyl”. Into the 1960s, drivers who preferred that premium type of gasoline told “service station attendants” to “fill it with ethyl”. But the TEL anti-knock additive in gasoline caused engines to emit in their exhaust tiny amounts of lead, which pollutes the air, and which cannot be controlled by automobile emissions-control systems because lead damages them. So, TEL was phased out during the 1970s and was replaced by other anti-knock additives. Of course, at gas stations in recent decades, gasoline that is more knock-resistant is referred to, not as “ethyl”, but as “premium”. A gasoline’s knock resistance can be measured in the laboratory, and the gasoline is assigned a numerical value that is referred to as its “knock rating”, or “octane number”. The more resistant a gasoline is to knock, the higher its octane number. Today, octane numbers at gas stations range, roughly, from 85 to 95. Of course, it is particularly catastrophic if an aircraft engine fails. So, “premium”-type aviation gasoline (“avgas”, for piston-engined aircraft) has an octane number of around 115. Too, many racing cars use avgas or special super-high-octane racing gasoline. Whether or how higher octane makes them go faster is a complicated matter that I will not go into here, but it certainly helps to increase the probability that the engine will finish the race. Of course, some types of racing cars do not use gasoline. For example, Indy cars use methanol (wood alcohol), which is weird stuff. For example, it is extremely corrosive to engine parts. But methanol is water soluble, which makes extinguishing fires easier, and it has excellent natural anti-knock properties. It might surprise some people that, in jet aircraft fuel, high octane is not desirable, and jet fuel would have a low octane rating. Jet fuel and diesel fuel, which are similar, feature, not an octane rating, but a “cetane” rating, which is the opposite of an octane rating. Jet fuel would run very poorly, if at all, in a gasoline engine, and would quickly ping it to destruction. Jet fuel would not make a gasoline engine “really take off”. Conversely, high-octane gasoline would run poorly, if at all, in a jet engine. I do not know anything about rocket fuel. There are several myths about engine pinging and gasoline octane. One myth is that the pinging noise is from “the valves rattling in the engine”. Another myth is that higher octane gasoline “burns hotter”. For example, it is not an old “wive’s tale”, but, rather, a common “husband’s tale”, that if you put premium gasoline into a lawn mower, or into a low performance car like a decades-old VW Beetle, you will “burn up the engine”. News reporters often excitedly describe some blazing inferno as “burning furiously!, like it was fueled by high-octane gasoline!”. In reality, higher octane gasoline not only is slightly more “reluctant” to burn, but actually has a slightly lower energy content. Technically, it is perfectly sensible to run premium gasoline in a lawn mower or an old Beetle. Technically, it would be more correct to exclaim that some blazing inferno was “burning furiously!, like it was fueled by low-octane, regular-grade gasoline.....the cheap stuff!”. But, you can’t let facts throw cold water on a hot news story! That’s why they call them “stories”. Automobile manufacturers like to suggest, especially regarding their economy models, that the cars are “designed to operate on” regular-grade fuel, which is a carefully worded statement, and a true statement, and which portrays the cars as economical to operate. But, more than a few car owners have observed that “it might have been designed to operate on regular-grade fuel, and the engine does operate on regular-grade fuel, but it pings, so I have to use premium”. Of course, the phrase “designed to operate on” remains true. In recent decades, a few “consumer advocates” have persuaded a few consumers that premium gasoline is “a ripoff, that is sold simply to make more money for oil companies”. In my years as an auto mechanic I have seen several engines that were consumed because their owners refused to be “ripped off” by premium gasoline. The engines pinged to death. Those consumers spent more money, and all at once, for major engine repairs, than the total additional money that they would have spent, and pennies at a time, on premium gasoline. Pinging can cause, for example, “blown” head gaskets, damaged heads, damaged pistons, damaged cylinder bores, “blown” engines, etc. Some people who own cars with engines that ping on regular-grade gasoline use it anyway, but they buy premium every other fill-up, or every third fill-up, or once a month, or whatever. They believe that octane has a residual beneficial effect that gives the engine some ongoing protection, to get it through the lean times. It does not. One old story was that if you put moth balls in a car’s gas tank it would keep the engine from pinging. The story had a basis in fact. Moth balls contained a chemical that has a powerful anti-knock effect. I have seen moth-balled gasoline tested in the laboratory for its octane rating. The moth balls would dissolve in the gas tank and become an anti-knock additive. The trick was to put enough moth balls into the tank to increase the octane enough to prevent pinging. Modern moth balls do not contain that chemical and will not stop engine pinging. Each piston-type gasoline engine has some minimum octane requirement, below which it will ping. Ping and octane requirement are a function of engine design, manufacturing tolerances, engine condition, specific engine part malfunctions, and certain engine adjustments. If your car’s engine does not ping, you do not need to buy higher octane gasoline. If it does ping, then, first, have a mechanic check it and make any necessary repairs or adjustments. Then, in my opinion, if it pings at all, or if you do not know whether your engine pings (because, for example, your hearing is fading, like mine), or if you just like to be on the safe side, you should routinely use premium gasoline. There are no harmful effects on an engine of using higher octane gasoline than the engine needs.
  11. Hehe, nice pics, but the owner of the car in pic 073 loses 20 points for having a big fat Macca's sticker on his front window! :D Ah, the humanity...
  12. Pic11 - 'line on da right. Last one for the night - hope you like the pics (skyzerr33, they were taken with an "old" 2 megapixel Canon PowerShot S10). Cheers, EXIT
  13. Pic10 - The Red Smear Mobile...
  14. Pic9 - Another lost Commondore...
  15. Pic8 - "Boostin' Away..."
  16. Pic7 - another "glow in the dark" mobile!
  17. Pic6 - Soarer City! Quite liked those - check out the funky "glow in the dark" one with neons on the far left.
  18. Pic5 - they found a use for all the Commondores at the end of the night in the Snakepit...
  19. Pic4 - the timing worked out great on this one! The car on the right is "Got Boost". The Christmas tree wasn't gonna get any greener but the dude in the left lane still had his foot on the brake! :lol:
  20. Pic3
  21. Pic2
  22. :burnout: Good night at the Motorplex tonight - here are some pics. Tsk, tsk... Only saw a couple of Skylines though... where were the rest of ya ???
  23. Thanks b005t. Franz's pics are superb! Time to upgrade my little camera I think!
  24. Exactly - they should have used ALL of the carpark to set up one simple track, instead of 2 postage-sized ones. At least then we would have seen some action!
  25. Yup, like a GoKart on steriods! Ditto that for the Lotus Elise and the Westfields.
×
×
  • Create New...