Jump to content
SAU Community

bean_8044

Members
  • Posts

    11
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by bean_8044

  1. sure, just give me an address. You have PayPal or anything of the sort? email [email protected]
  2. Last chance sale for $200......anyone.....
  3. R32 GTR cams f/s -unknown km but still in good condition. Shipped from Okinawa for $250AU
  4. If youre going to do your own tuning with the PowerFC then im assuming that youre comfortable using the W/B O2 and changing around the settings in the ECU. You can get an EEPROM burner for $60US and chips are about $15US. You have to get the Wideband O2 either way and the software for ECU tuning is free. -In my opinoin- i would get the eeprom burner and do it yourself. Of course ive never wanted to shell out that much and use the PFC, so i dont have any expierence with it.
  5. I dont think you can see much of a difference if you could lighten up the auto flywheel. The auto flywheels arent like manuals since theyre just mounting points for the torque convertor and ring gear. The torque convertor by itself is very heavy and on top of that its filled with ALOT of fluid.
  6. Im not sure if its the meter so much as the sensor. The meter is just a graphic representation of the voltage produced by the sensor. There is an ideal operating temperature for the sensors as most wont operate until 300deg. The new four and five wire sensors have the ability to heat themselves, but there is still a max operating temperature. I know some people with the LM-1 use something like a heatsink to keep the temps from going too high. Its just a piece of copper plating drilled in the center for the sensor to go through.
  7. Good points. A mail order chip isnt the best way to get performance. Its easy to expand the maps and take off the limiters or change them around, but tuning is another matter. Of course, you could buy the FC for $1500 and still jack it up just as much as a $15 "universal" chip would. If the tuner doesnt know what they're doing, then they dont know what they're doing. No high tech ECU will save a bad tuner
  8. Give me about a week or two and i can hook you up. Theres a typhoon comin
  9. I was just wondering if anyone thought about the type of cams that they were using. I have R32 GTR and R33 GTR Vspec cams and the lobes on the exhaust Vspec are advanced a few degrees. Thats if im looking at it correctly and not thinking like a complete retard(No pun intended). Also, it seems like with the higher lift on intake its maxing out the afm quicker and therefore mis-representing the load percentage to the ECU. Am i thinking about that correctly? So, would a fix for that be to expand the stock fuel/ignition maps or even scale down the stock AFM?
  10. Im just wondering if anyone has thought about the type of cams that they are getting. I have R32 GTR cams and R33 GTR Vspec cams and the lobes are different on the Vspec exhaust. Looks to be advanced a few degrees unless im a retard and reading them wrong. Also, with the AFM reading more air due to the duration of intake, the ECU would be reading it at alot higher load than what its actually at and therefore running out of the fuel/timing map sooner. Am i thinking this correctly? So why not expand the maps to read higher boost or scale down the AFM to read the "adjusted" load?
×
×
  • Create New...