Disco-Thanks for your reply. I've given up trying to keep up with the different names everyone gives to the GT series.The turbo(s) I refer to are TO4S comp wheel (48 trim) ,flowing 44lbs/min,rated at 400hp and 440hp with 0.64 and 0.86A/R respectivly.So yes,it seems we're refering to the same unit.
Now I'm no turbo expert,but I'd like to discuss this. If this turbo is not built well,and requires high exhaust gas speeds/more revs to get it up on song,that's fair enough....But,wouldn't this just mean less use of the wastegate for control.I mean if it needs more shaft speed to work,the wastegate wouldn't need to start opening as early/by-passing as much gas,etc to limit shaft speed,so would this really matter? If anything,the requirment for higher shaft speeds to generate good boost would ensure that these turbo's would be efficient at high revs(?)
Also,the issue of exhaust housings/wheels being a restriction at high revs,and/or generating "detination friendly" egt's...surely this wouldn't be the case (at least) with the 0.86a/r housing...on say a 2.0L engine? or do you mean the actual turbine wheel creates too much turbulance at high speeds? or am I no where near it?
I notice that some "GT30"s use a TO4S comp wheel (56 trim) and 55lbs/min flow,with 0.82 (84 trim) exhaust and rated at 500hp.... still with a TO4S wheel? do these turbos share the same disadvantages you speak of as the "GT25"s?
And just to confuse things (well,me) further,there's a "GT25" that uses a GT35 comp wheel,flowing 44lbs/min-(same as the above mentioned 'bad' GT25) uses a 76 trim exhaust wheel( same as above too) and rated at 400hp????????? so that brings me back to the same question again.....can the TO4S wheels, (and thus equiped turbos) be that bad?
Thanks for your time