Jump to content
SAU Community

SimonR32

Members
  • Posts

    3,200
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3
  • Feedback

    100%

Everything posted by SimonR32

  1. Ok Ladies and Gents, I went out to the track with my new catch can set up and it works mint... My standard RB26 managed to spit about 2L of oil (which all got caught in the catch can) over 5 sessions at Barbagallo. So the catch can worked great, but my oil level went from the hump of the dipstick to low during the night, it's not really optimal to have to try and remove the catch can, drain it and then put it back in the motor during events so I'm looking for a solution. My catch can has a -10 drain on the bottom designed to be returned to the sump but foolishly we didn't weld on a fitting on the sump when the motor was out. At the moment it's just blanked off but considering how much oil was in the catch can and how "clean" it was I'm really keen to return to the sump. So my options as I see it are; Run a -10 line from the catch can around the back of the block above the bell housing and to the rear turbo oil drain with an inline one way valve. The advantage is the rear oil drain is currently blanked and not doing anything and technically it's on the "right" side of the motor so should drain under most conditions as the crank will be creating vacuum and pulling in the oil. The issue is it's going to be a very long line and gravity may take a while to drain over that distance. Run a -10 line to above the oil of the drivers side of the sump. The problem being I'm not keen in removing the motor (so would have to be very careful drilling and tapping the sump for the fitting while the motor was in the car) Comments/suggestions etc are welcome? Most keen to go option 1 as it's going to be a fairly easy fix, just wondering if everyone thinks it should work ok.
  2. Finally got my ass into gear, purchased some Advan 050's and got down to No Limits at Barbagallo Raceway last night. I have to say that this GTR is infinitely better to drive than my old Green Gts-t, the Gts-t felt like you were flipping a coin to see if it was going to kill you every time you hit the brakes or the accelerator. This GTR is very nice to drive even with the lack of development and set up, so much more confidence! Had a few issues, hit boost cut 11 times on the first two laps (1.74bar) so RRob pulled the boost right back to 1.1bar for the night. Long track was just getting a handle on the car but ended up getting fairly fast by the last session. Short track I only got 3 laps in before calling it a night but was fairly quick straight off the bat. I went to the night hoping to scrape into the 64's long track and 55's short track which I thought would be a decent result for first real outing. Ended up going 64.2 long track and a 54.4 short track so much better than planned. Was stoked with my times, now resetting my goals now and keen to get back out there again. To give you some idea of times, I would have qualified 2nd in Street Cars and Improved production class at their last meet. Not bad for what is essentially a street car with full interior and stock motor
  3. Also deleted cookies to get rid of that shit mobile version
  4. So I have now heard, not impressed!
  5. Apparently 4.5 million litres of E85 just arrived at the wharf in Western Australia, time to get my hopes up!!!
  6. Looks more responsive than a normal 3076R, will be interesting to see how far you can push it with more boost and revs! How much boost you planning on running, 3bar seems to be the new benchmark
  7. That has to be hp not kw yeah? Looks mighty responsive!
  8. So you have forked out on pretty much the most expensive and hardest to source turbo that's too big for the application so compromises response and then use a boost controller to further decrease response? I want the drugs you are having!
  9. ETS-Pro maintains preload, the R32 and R33 system are same operating speed (pump gaining and losing pressure) and it has a brand new ECU with much faster sample rates?
  10. Went for a drive yesterday (to get it licenced) and did some 4th gear flat road pulls from around 3000rpm, getting 1 bar at 3700-3800rpm which is probably a few hundred rpm better than my old GTR with a T04Z with similar top end power capability. Makes for a savage car on the road, pulls long and hard through the gears and is an absolute bullet. Going to go back on the dyno after I sort out a second 044 and run it up again holding 1.6bar through the revs, should go 650hp (485kw) fairly easily by the looks
  11. R33/R34's with stock turbos and high 200rwhp trap at around those speeds. I would have expected more around the 115mph with that power
  12. http://www.deatschwerks.com/products/fuel-injectors/sport-compact/nissan/skyline/rb26dett-skyline/1989-2002-rb26dett Pick your flavour!
  13. Stao do you have cam gears in your car? Power peaking in your car at 6800 is unusual for a T67, all the other results have made power right up and past 8000rpm. All your results seem to have strong late mid range and then fall over top end, cam gear timing is the only thing I can think of? Have you talked to Trent about it, I do remembering him commenting on something similar in the past Good result, would hammer!
  14. Your injectors can only flow 2L in 20sec at full tilt and your stock pump should flow about 1.4L at 3bar (as above) in the same time with 13.8V so you shouldn't really run into any issues as it will actually flow more than that because there is less pressure.
  15. Quicker you get to the end the slower your mph
  16. Are you joking? 600-700rpm is a huge difference. That's about the difference between the T88 that was on my car and the 6262 I now have. The T88 was horrible and I mean horrible on the street and even worse at the track while the 6262 is a great little zippy thing.
  17. It's on a low mount 6boost manifold, not a stock one... He has mentioned it before and posted pictures. You may be able to squeeze on with a spacer on a stock manifold but it would be tight!
  18. Well my 6262 is better than my old T04Z but not the miracle that some would lead you to believe. The 6466 is a fair wack bigger (195hp rated), I doubt you would be getting that for nothing
  19. Should make plenty more power without being too much laggier from what I have seen
  20. I actually made 450kw and trust me there is plenty more in it but I ran out of fuel pump. I wouldnt be suprised to see another 30-40kw if I ran 25psi but as you said that is on e85. 6262 is a nice balance for decent power and not too much lag. I was tossing up between it and the 6266 and went the smaller. I think I made the right decision
  21. Should strap it to the side of the motor not take it home!
×
×
  • Create New...