Jump to content
SAU Community

SimonR32

Members
  • Posts

    3,200
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3
  • Feedback

    100%

Everything posted by SimonR32

  1. Wasn't clutching at straws, was just thinking of results in the past rather than comparing to the -10's... But yes you are correct smashes the -10's for power in the best comparison we have
  2. This is true in the comparison graph, but most -5 combos seem to make around 500-500rwhp on decent octane fuel
  3. Well they don't murder your GT-SS set up down low, the diff ratio was wrong for that calculation Very hard to compare with anything besides the -10 graph because scale is in km/hr not RPM and god knows how that translates with that box/diff set up... By my fairly educated guess they appear similar in response to -5's with about the same top end, maybe a tad more responsive down low Personally looking at their packaging, price and engine bay mayhem I would lean towards still using -5's. Actually no I wouldn't I'd be going a single every time but hey that's just me
  4. I have the same problem with another company. I purchased a Blu-ray and have now been told my stupid DVD player wont play it... I can't believe the company has screwed me out of all this money for a DVD player when it won't play Blu-rays
  5. Makes a lot more sense now Hard to compare with a lot of other results from the past but it clearly shits all over the -10 set up!
  6. Stop whinging that the product does not even work if you don't even know if it works or not on your car...
  7. Interesting Because I spend way too much time studying dyno graphs I did pick up a few things. Peak power for 4.11 diff ratio GTR's with that power is usually around 200km/hr or 7000rpm, the EFR's seem to make peak power at around 170km/hr. 22psi for turbos that make that power usually make peak boost at around 124 km/hr while the EFR's seem to make peak boost at 94km/hr. So makes boost 30km/hr aka 1000ish rpm earlier and drops off peak power 30km/hr or 1000ish rpm earlier if all things are equal... I'm assuming the diff ratios are the same? Food for thought for you Beer Barron, your very well set up GT-SS motor makes about 190rwhp at 4000rpm and this set up makes 400rwhp. Almost unbelievable
  8. We did it with my GTR, graph saying 680hp looks cool and scares the shit out of people when you mms it to them during tuning haha
  9. If you look at the power axis you will see that it is referred to as S_PS The "S" represents predicted flywheel. So any Dyno Dynamics graph with S_HP or S_KW etc is predicted power at the flywheel not recorded power at the wheels. The guys from the UK tend to use it a lot... See below as an example, this is a stock RB25 turbo on a RB25 running 12psi (which would be around 270rwhp normally)
  10. Prediction: 12psi at 5000rpm 280rwkw and a whole lot of fail
  11. As my above post realistic figures are probably more like 165kw by 4000rpm and 310rwkw
  12. That is predicted flywheel ps and not wheel ps. So take off a fair whack of power everywhere
  13. Friend who was over at the world time attack said that a few BW EFR's went boom during the weekend?
  14. see same same haha
  15. No doubt they will be as elusive as actual results
  16. Sounds very very similar to my car
  17. We both know each others points are valid All good, but you have very conveniently managed to dodge my question Can I pretty much be safe in saying that the first and only result that I have seen from a BW EFR turbo in Australia has resulted in less than expected power and a turbo failure before the tune was even finished?
  18. I could guarantee you that it's 100% your fault! Next time if you want to throw away cash, I'll give you my bank details
  19. Sounds like a poorly assembled motor more than tuner failure... Who built the motor?
  20. Come on, so far it's safe to say it has not liven up to the hype then. What you just wrote is contradictory Sounds like the turbo has gone bang, if it has how long is it going to take for Full Race to get you a replacement?
  21. Evo X does 0-200km/hr in 23sec, a Evo VI does it in 21sec, but a Evo IV with a cat back can do it in 13sec?!? LOL
  22. Nick you are crazy Whens the ETA?
  23. Crazy stuff... Love the straight line acceleration, very impressive
  24. I just noticed that... It's making boost really early but the power in the midrange is lacking and seems average at best
×
×
  • Create New...