SimonR32

I was excited till I saw it was a dynojet dyno... Realistic figure would be 10%ish less so 550ish, still impressive!

love it!

That's not exactly hard though...

lies

No doubt air is a reference to a gas, I was just saying it was a misnomer to use air instead of a "gas" or "exhaust gas" Also remember you are burning a large percentage of the 21% oxygen in the combustion process so this would significantly change the gas properties

You should buy like a hundred Bee-R rev limiters and sell them for $1000 a pop Bulk profit!!! E85 sucks balls for bangs and flames

Nice work fatz... I assume you mean twin td06sl2-20g 10cm?!? I wouldn't imagine they will be not too responsive but they will hammer hard once they come on. What power you aiming for?

So ghey!

Just to troll a little more, those stickers would weigh more than the rear pods Looks the goods!

onto it now haha

what isn't is making enough power yet? Haha fineline, missing the context of your post... Are you trying to imply/suggest my motor isn't stock?

As much as I hate to agree with Nazi Nismoid, he would be correct on this one. My car made 410rwkw with STP correction on and 360rwkw on the same tank of fuel on a dyno dynamics roller! But then again I was never it denial that this was going to happen haha and my results are backed up with a fairly stout 132.5mph on the black dyno... PS. On topic my stock RB25 head is happy revving to a limiter of 8100rpm

I would agree with the Hollinger being a heap better in every way... There is only one real draw back that while driving around town you can never skip gears on downchanges

No it's not the issue

I have a profec b spec II in my car at the moment, it works great (was cheap second hand) and has 2 boost levels but I feel that the Blitz dual solenoid ones work better at holding boost dead flat, plus the Blitz ID3 has 4 settings. I have also used Turbotech bleed valves on various cars and once they are set up (they can be a bit fiddly and sensitive) you seriously can't beat them for price. Only issue is they only have one boost setting.

Yeah they fit piece of piss... You could use the power fc with a vct controller but I would recommend a Z32 ecu with RB25 loom and nistune as per XRATED above

Just a warning regarding the internal wastegates on the Kinugawa turbos... The only negative feedback I could find on the net about their turbos were issues with internal gates having boost control issues! Obviously the 8cm T3 will be a different design, but just a warning. Also we will never know till someone gives it a go so who is game?

Blitz dual solenoid (either spec-r or sbcid3 etc) are the best

Winner!

I assume your talking gases and not air? Air refers to the atmosphere... Gas would refer to what is in the exhaust manifold! Gas when heated will either increase in volume or increase in pressure. Density of gas when heated will decrease. Viscocity of a gas increases with temperature.

diff ratio 4.1 or 4.3?

Fair enough, but saying that if you look hard enough you can pick faults with any design.... Firstly how much does the manifold/collector weigh? I would put it to you any gain made by the manifold would be offset by it's weight compared to a more conventional item. Another example is where your collector merges the gases for the gates have to escape at a 90 degree angle to the flow. This used to be a issue with early 6boost manifolds that at high rpm the gas takes the least path of resistance and just bypasses the gates altogether creating boost creep all the way through the rev range. To fix this now all 6boost manifolds have a gate provision on a angle to flow the same direction of the exhaust gases. I think yours should be alright though because you are using twin gates but it could cause issues! My main beef with the collector is where the 3 gate ports merge together. You talk of this as "to achieve the perfect merge and at the same time extract equal quantity of waste gases without causing extensive disruption to the flow." But if you think about the directions of the gas flow two of the extraction paths have to flow around 2 x 90 degree bends and while the other just has to travel a straight path. What's worse to this and in my opinion a huge design flaw is where these 3 gas paths merge... 2 are opposing each (blowing at each other) while the third is trying to push through the middle. This will cause major disruption of flow to all 3 paths and also a uneven balance. If you want a example of a better design look at a standard rb25 low mount cast manifold. It also has two opposing gas flows but internally it has a divider to direct the gases in the same direction before the merge to not cause issues. Hope that all makes sense Maybe you can ask John his opinion on this?!?

Well I would have picked either a 6boost or a Full Race personally... Testing, well I have personally used a 6boost on 2 different cars and they both worked perfectly! Can you tell me with your "testing" how this will perform any better than either of those brands? I'm not knocking it, but I could pick a lot better ways to spend the extra money on a car to make it better than that... but hey, I'm happy to be proven wrong

"R&D development" = research and development development? haha What we are trying to say that for a 10th of the price you could have got basically exactly the same result!

MT ET Streets 255/50/16 Did 2 x 1.8 60ft before but backed off so I didn't get banned, I could have easily gone a 1.6 if I had a bit more of a chance