Jimbo2000

here you are guys as you can see it accommodatesquite a large (bigger than mushrooms anyway) pod without a problem and it looks quite steathy (stock) a coppa might not look twice its pretty easy to install you may also notice that i've run a pipe from the stock intercooler hole directly from the front bar. dont stress if you dont have a front mount it fits over a stock intercooler also hooray for zoidberg! Jim

i have pics of it installed with insulation if needed. really good product!

are'nt you NOT supposed to gap irridiums? i thought it cracked the irridium coating...

sweet thanks eggo

is it fine to have no mesh on either side? got a z32 now with perfect mesh but my old one has no mesh at all. i want to sell it at some stage

whats a strawberry face? heard of it before, is it just another name for a sileighty? ps. that onevia look the goods

check da sticky thread at da top of the DIY/FAQ section *edit* screw it, there you go http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...3246#post943246

the search button ROCKS!!!! give it a burl sometime Problem: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ght=fuel+sender Fix: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=2841& 65 litres apparently but i've opnly ever filled 60 and that was REALLY empty

that sounds good but what if you lend your car to your mum to get a bottle of milk and she forgets about the million volt jolt she'll get if she dosnt do something right bye ma!

pm sent yesterday

thank you i love christening new forums

not too sure, havn't seen it up close but you're probably right, as the salesperson said its not as much secure as a visual detterant

if your talking about the wheel, it sits nicely on the floor behind the back seat with the fin pointing up so its pretty secure there got it for about 200-250 (cant quite remember) i think the handbrake to gearstick one is closer to 100-150.

1. incentive to join (greedy) 2. so that a workshop that might get negative feedback dosnt get on here and carry on silly

if the rating system goes ahead put it in the members section

i've had good and bad and then good again experience with the same workshop...what the hell happens there

there we go, finally found the picture another fine product from autolok, not quite as secure as the steering wheel lock but a pretty bloody good visual detterant dont you think shan you got nothin!

smash proof windows and clamps on every wheel then you'd be set and a ring of fire with a loop of miniguns setup with sensors surrounding the car 24hrs a day

true i just cant stop pushing the autolok on SAU its a real good product. unpickable is its claim (well within the sort of time a theif would have) Hardened steel shield which simply slides over the steering wheel to give maximum security to both the car and driver's airbag. Features a unique locking bar system, which deadlocks without needing the key. High security anti-pick disk detainer lock with over 1 million different key combinations. Telescopic hardened steel arm restricts steering wheel movement and retracts into the unit for easy storage. Finished in highly visible bright yellow, fits all standard size steering wheels from 350 to 400mm. Key registration service included to protect from loss of keys. Manufacturer's 3 year guarantee.

ps. those standard club locks can be taken apart within a minute by an expert dickhead

autolok 2000, really good lock.... but using it as the one and only preventative measure is pointess

nah both sixes srb

Ronin change that ****ing avatar mate check your PM's

OK, the story behind this is... There's this nutball who digs things out of his back yard and sends the stuff he finds to the Smithsonian Institute, labeling them with scientific names, insisting that they are actual archeological finds. The really weird thing about these letters is that this guy really exists and does this in his spare time! Anyway... here's a letter from the Smithsonian Institute to this man who sent the Institute one of his 'major finds'. From: Paleoanthropology Division Smithsonian Institute 207 Pennsylvania Avenue Washington, DC 20078 Dear Sir: Thank you for your latest submission to the Institute, labeled "211-D, layer seven, next to the clothesline post. Hominid skull." We have given this specimen a careful and detailed examination, and regret to inform you that we disagree with your theory that it represents "conclusive proof of the presence of Early Man in Charleston County two million years ago." Rather, it appears that what you have found is the head of a Barbie doll, of the variety one of our staff, who has small children, believes to be the "Malibu Barbie". It is evident that you have given a great deal of thought to the analysis of this specimen, and you may be quite certain that those of us who are familiar with your prior work in the field were loathe to come to contradiction with your findings. However, we do feel that there are a number of physical attributes of the specimen which might have tipped you off to its modern origin: 1. The material is molded plastic. Ancient hominid remains are typically fossilized bone. 2. The cranial capacity of the specimen is approximately 9 cubic centimeters, well below the threshold of even the earliest identified proto-hominids. 3. The dentition pattern evident on the "skull" is more consistent with the common domesticated dog than it is with the "ravenous man-eating Pliocene clams" you speculate roamed the wetlands during that time. This latter finding is certainly one of the most intriguing hypotheses you have submitted in your history with this institution, but the evidence seems to weigh rather heavily against it. Without going into too much detail, let us say that: A. The specimen looks like the head of a Barbie doll that a dog has chewed on. B. Clams don't have teeth. It is with feelings tinged with melancholy that we must deny your request to have the specimen carbon dated. This is partially due to the heavy load our lab must bear in its normal operation, and partly due to carbon dating's notorious inaccuracy in fossils of recent geologic record. To the best of our knowledge, no Barbie dolls were produced prior to 1956 AD, and carbon dating is likely to produce wildly inaccurate results. Sadly, we must also deny your request that we approach the National Science Foundation's Phylogeny Department with the concept of assigning your specimen the scientific name "Australopithecus spiff-arino." Speaking personally, I, for one, fought tenaciously for the acceptance of your proposed taxonomy, but was ultimately voted down because the species name you selected was hyphenated, and didn't really sound like it might be Latin. However, we gladly accept your generous donation of this fascinating specimen to the museum. While it is undoubtedly not a Hominid fossil, it is, nonetheless, yet another riveting example of the great body of work you seem to accumulate here so effortlessly. You should know that our Director has reserved a special shelf in his own office for the display of the specimens you have previously submitted to the Institution, and the entire staff speculates daily on what you will happen upon next in your digs at the site you have discovered in your back yard. We eagerly anticipate your trip to our nation's capital that you proposed in your last letter, and several of us are pressing the Director to pay for it. We are particularly interested in hearing you expand on your theories surrounding the "trans-positating fillifitation of ferrous ions in a structural matrix" that makes the excellent juvenile Tyrannosaurus rex femur you recently discovered take on the deceptive appearance of a rusty 9-mm Sears Craftsman automotive crescent wrench. Yours in Science, Harvey Rowe Curator, Antiquities