Jump to content
SAU Community

minesskyline

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    63

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

 Content Type 

Everything posted by minesskyline

  1. minesskyline
    I've finally got my twin 6758 kit in the mail at the tuner's this week, so the build begins. Pretty excited to see what it will do both on the dyno and on the street. Will post full results in a month or two once it's done.
  2. minesskyline
    I'm interested in the intercooler, but I'm from the States. Willing to ship?
  3. minesskyline
    Positioning isn't really important nor is aesthetics, for me personally. I'm looking at performance from twin 7163's versus other options, like a single EFR. According to Jon@FullRace, these turbos will be enough for 700whp on 91 octane, which were my goals originally. I don't mind the twin setup if it performs as well or better than an EFR single for the power requirements.
  4. minesskyline
    I'm from the states so I don't think legality is really a big issue here.
  5. minesskyline
    Has anyone considered twin 7163's as shown here?: http://www.full-race.com/store/efr-turbo-kit/nissan-rb26dett-efr-twin-turbo-kit-1.html This looks to be the direction I will head over the winter.
  6. minesskyline
    Probably best to search or open a different thread for this. Once a big thread like this derails it's hard to get it back on track.
  7. minesskyline
    Looks really good. Awesome results. I don't know much about RB30's. How do you think this would compare to a 26/7/8 RB motor instead?
  8. minesskyline
    Someone might be able to correct me if my math is wrong, but @ 27psi, but that turbo is going to be out of the efficiency range for your setup.
  9. minesskyline
    Definitely don't take as what I said as offense. I am not trying to bag on your progress. You're just the only person with results, and I, among everyone else, appreciate what you've done. It probably is too early to call it either way. But your supplemental information does sound more promising.
  10. minesskyline
    Hmm... I would expect more from this turbo based on everybody's thoughts on the turbo. Was this done on 93? And what psi? I know this isn't a -5 vs 8374 thread but the -5 seems to be the most common setup so it's a good comparison. And based on this dyno, the -5's still seem better, no?
  11. minesskyline
    Yea, I saw that post, but unfortunately it's one of the very few with any results so far on these turbos.
  12. minesskyline
    Yea, this is pretty true actually. I only found one real post so far. And while looking at the compressor map and some of the results from other cars looks pretty good, I think there definitely needs to be more data at this point.
×
×
  • Create New...