gixer

Does anyone know if the EFR series is OK with the use of antilag or have any expirince with it on them?

The EFR8474 is my 3rd EFR turbo and after it came with compressor housing, like the one from your second video i will never get another one. All of them are with turbine housings with quality way lower than on the pictures on the websites, but this with the compressor cover was the top.

I forgot to mention the thing you just said, when you watching those kind of defects and how their quality control, if they have any, give OK to be used, how you can be sure and confident about the quality control of the CHRA-bearing, wheels, shaft and etc. And one of the advertisements from the begining is the beautifuly casted turbine and compressorr housings, which very few people are lucky to get. It can be treated like some sort of scam when you see the perfect pictures in every onlineshop and their website and then you get those ugly pieces of metal. Even i am worried to touch where the cover is chiped, because i am scared to not snap off more metall from it. And at the end this response from BW.

Yes i know ill not seeing it, but i am mad that there are quality issues like those from 10 years and they get worse when at same time the price and waiting time goes up. When you buy a TV, or a phone, or a car and something else, their performance may be fine too, but itll not be cool the car paintjob to be scratched or panels dented and etc. No effect on the performance should not be an excuse for cutting corners and expenses and in same time you want more from the customer and the worst thing you waiting months for this. But whatever...

please see response from Borg Warner for the EFR super core. “Unfortunately the manufacturing processes sometimes results in parts as shown in the pictures that were provided. Your customer is understandably displeased with the appearance of the compressor cover. Here is an official statement: Although aesthetically imperfect, this is a cosmetic issue and will have no effect on the form fit or function of the compressor cover and/or turbocharger So thats the official statement of BW. Totally unacceptable, when we talk for turbo of that price range, even a chinese crap for 150usd have better housing quality than this 3k$ shit. I am shocked how arrogant are those companies these days, they constantly brings the prices up, quality down and dont care about their customer satisfaction. If we want their crap, we have to live with those kind of bullshits, if we dont like it, they spit on our faces and told us somebody else will buy it. This is my 3rd EFR turbo and for me non of the competition have something to compete with those, but its my last one after this. I had and still have many other high end turbos like GTXs and Owendevelopments Garretts, so no cutting edges on prices and etc, but when i pay for something like that and waited more than 3 months for it, like its some sort of spaceship technology, i want to be with top quality and finish. Even their SX series are better executed, i have had 2 of them too. 🤬🤬🤬

From a seller in my country, who got it from german suplier. He contact them immidiately and they told us they will notice BW. Next funny things is that i paid for whole assembled turbo and get the turbo in two piece, supercore and housing in separate boxes and without bolts and those little things, which hold them together. I am pissed

Borg Warner "perfectoin"!!! When you paid 3k$, waited 3 months and at the end get this shit 😶

3ltr 2JZ, 7500-7800rpm

Itll be on a drift car, so coming on boost hard, early is desirable.

How much laggier the 9174 is from 8474?

In Bulgaria, where i lives, two times the customs held my parts for two months before they even give me a chance to pay the charges for them. The whole system here is f*cked.

No, i am located in Europe and shipping and customs will be nightmare, if i have to get it from Australia.

What about 9174 1.05? I cant get my hands on 8474 and now i am wondering about this one.

Hello, could you guys help me choose between 8374 and 8474, both with 1.05 housings, for 2jz ge non vvti engine. Quick specs are 9.5CR, BC264 cams, sligthly ported head. The target is 650 to around 700whp with best spool and response and 7500 to maximum 7800rpm limit. Is the 8374 be enough or 8474 will be needed for those goals? Fuel will be E100. Thank you in advance!

On bottom mount T4 twin scroll manifold, will an EFR 7163 CHRA be sitting higher then 7670 one? Thanks