Finn_GT-T

There is a guy in Germany who manufactures such lips: https://chrismo-parts.jimdofree.com

Thank you for the infos. I would need 120 mm rods if I wanted to use the rb25 pistons with the rb26 crank. Machining rb26 pistons to suit the rb25 neo head is not that easy. the rb25 neo pistons do not have a flat surface but a little dome and the pockets for in and ex valves. To find someone with the right cnc skills would be too much effort for a 61 ccm higher displacement. These are the cp pistons for the neo, that I are already have here:

Ok, i've found the right search term for this info. If my information is correct, the compression high between the two differs by 1.5 mm. RB26: 30.0 mm RB25: 31.5 mm That would be too much difference using the stroker rods.

I've just had another silly idea Maybe I could use conrods from the tomei rb28 stroker kit. These are 3 mm shorter than the std rods. Does anyone know the exact pin heigth difference between the rb25 and rb26 pistons?

I am also searching for that sexy red emblem. Does anyone know the part number? Amayama offers a part with the number 62890-AB000, but it seems to be the chrome version of the emblem. Where can i get the red version? Any suggestions?

I think I would feel a little bit bad about machining down a shiny new set of forged pistons I would also worry about the stability without the dome... maybe that's a too high price for the little increase. Do you know which pistons they used in the engines you saw running?

I was hoping it was a common mod because it is a cheap (but small) stroker for the 25. I've already found a few threads on this subject on UK Skyline forums. They say it works, but don't mention what pistons they used. In the end, as you said, the main problem would be the pin height of the pistons (if using 25 pistons) or the compression ratio (if using 26 pistons). The compression ratio could be lowered if I use a thicker head gasket. The thickest one I found is 1.8 mm thick. Wiseco offers pistons that lower the compression ratio to 8.25 compression for the rb26. If I have the head and block machined, I may lose 0.1 to 0.2 mm that would also slightly increase the cr. So maybe the cr problem could be solved. I just wonder if the pistons and valves do not collide. Especially if I use the VTC of the neo head. I don't get the problem solved if I enlarge the combustion chambers in the head a little. Does anyone have experiences with this? You are right, the increase in capacity would be low but with the right pistons it would be an easy modification because i am rebuilding my engine anyway with new rods and pistons. My current setup is a gtx3076 gen2 on the stock neo with with 1.2 mm metal head gasket and i want to keep the turbo because I installed that setup just 1,5 years ago. I am just aiming for a bit more low end torque.

Hi guys, i am doing a rebuild of an RB25det NEO engine. I have the chance to get an RB26 long nose crank for a good price. My idea now is to put the crank into my rb25 block an buy forget rb26 rods and pistons to get a cheap stroker and solve the short nose problem of the rb25. The crank should fit into the block but what about the combination of the pistons and the neo head? Will there be an issue with colliding pistons and valves when using the vct of the neo block? Will the compression rate be ok? Any experiences with that combination?

ok, this is exactly the information I opened the thread for. Thank you guys. If I understood you correctly Driftworks just names them wrong. But the Driftworks "Rear Traction Arms" are the same as the Whiteline "Rear Radius Arms"? Driftworks: https://www.driftworks.com/driftworks-rear-traction-arms-with-poly-bushes-for-nissan-skyline-r34-98-02.html Whiteline: https://www.whiteline.com.au/product_detail4.php?part_number=KTA117&sans_vehicle=1

Ok I just ordered front and rear camber arms with poly bushes, front tension rods with rod ends and rear toe arms with poly bushes. Let's see how they affect the handling. If that is not enough for me, I can always get further upgrades. I was wondering if rear traction arms would pay off but according to internet forums they are only supposed to provide more stability for acceleration. to identify a need for an upgrade i will first need to get less wheel spin by changing tire width ;)

I'm going to fit some new wheels on my Skyline GT-T (9.5x18 Offset: 18). It's obvious to me that i will need more negative camber to fit them. I looked at the Driftworks shop an found out that they offer many options. For camber adjustment I chose: Rear camber arms with poly bushes: https://www.driftworks.com/driftworks-rear-camber-arms-withpoly-bushes-for-nissan-skyline-r34-98-02.html And front camber arms: https://www.driftworks.com/driftworks-front-camber-arms-for-nissan-skyline-r34-98-02.html Are there any major upgrades that I should install while I'm at it? As there is a 10% discount there, I am open for further investment. The more you buy, the more you save

I've installed the Nismo meter in my 98 GTT that was converted from AT to MT. There was nothing to do but removing the old one and replace it with the nismo one. ECU was the stock AT one. So maye you forgot to plug in some connector or did not put it in completely?

Hi from northern Germany to southern Germany! What does the japanese writing on the wing mean?

Ok, then the adder table should be the right one for that. Thank you!

Ok, if I unterstood you correctly: It is not necessary to insert the whole flow dataset somewhere in PcLink, but only the correction to get a linear line below 2.2 ms?