Wow, it's been 2 years since my last post, but I finally have good news to share about my G30-770! Last comment is here back on page 19.
TL;DR: twinscroll 1.06 with reputable manifold is better than single-scroll 0.83 with chinese manifold (shocker). Around 500rpm faster spool and +30hp everywhere (ish).
Changes:
Sinco T4 Twin-scroll manifold
single 50mm turbosmart wastegate
Twin-scroll 1.06 housing from ATP (still same G30-770 core)
TI 525 fuel pump in a surge tank (good early indicator, we ran out of fuel!)
Everything else in my original post is the same
The blue line is where we ended; red is just a random run that hit 22psi. At the beginning of the day, O2 correction was up to 14% at the top end, which fairly directly indicated a power/efficiency increase compared to the old setup. At equal boost, its about +30hp/30ftlb (ish), but the most noticeable change is the 500rpm faster spool making it way more drivable in the mid-range, no longer feeling like a pig. Do notice, we settled in at lower average boost and flattened the torque curve for drivability, where on the old sheet we held boost and rode the torque wave. Along with not-quite smoothed boost, not having the old run saved and different correction factor (oops), it's a bit difficult to compare old/new dyno sheets but the real world feeling is drastic and can be observed on the dyno. I hope this is still a helpful conclusion for on-lookers.
Conclusion: good parts are good, twin-scroll works, and I'm pretty happy about the response now, resolving my dyno sheet envy.
While I'm sure there's still room for improvement, I'm happy enough to not want to make changes. I'm sure a G30-660 would respond better and be a better fit at this power level. Surely a rebuilt and high-comp motor would respond better (and could take more boost/rpm). Oxygenated E98 would also come on boost better (this was pump E60). Maybe an EFR would still do better. Single-gate for TS seems fine in my application, but maybe there's a subtle advantage to true dual-wg (i.e. scavenging). Is the smaller runner size compared to 6boost beneficial in the mid-range? Hard to quantify without spending a crap-load more money for diminishing returns, but at least the low-hanging fruit was successful.