I love all these "A skyline should have a turbo, two doors and a manual, otherwise it's not a real skyline" statements.
Have you guys ever actually noticed that skylines STARTED as NA sedans? and the original (and possibly the best) GTR was a 2L NA?
The Skyline names has been around for over 40 years, and the majprity of that lineup? Yep, NA Sedans.
People need to stop kidding themselves, yeah they are good cars but they aren't race bred, pedigree supercars. They're a halo model, based out of a mass market sedan, just like an SS Commodore. All the NOS pumping, Neon lit, blowoff valvin' muzztechs should really get past the conception that their GTST is a cut price track weapon, and NA's are the retarded off shoot of that. The reality is that NA sedans are the mass market model and the source of $$$ for nissan, and the GTR is a tricked up homologation version of that, and your Veilside wearing, 8" exhaust toting GTST is the bastard child caught in limbo somewhere between the two.
(with the exception of the current one, which really is a bespoke, cut price supercar, hence the dropping of 'skyline' from its name, to distance itself from the tricked up image).
A little off topic with the rant there, but my point is thus. The Skyline world is bigger than "turbo and two doors", and if that's all you can see, you're missing the point and buying into the Fast and Furious depiction of street racing, NAAWWWWWWSS and Johnny Tran having at least a hundred grand under the hood of that thing.
The real beauty of a Skyline is in the handling, not the power. On a twisty road that you know well, and with a good suspension tune there's nothing that can make you happier for the money. Which explains why i've had WRX's, P-Platers with a god complex and a V8 commodore and even a C63 AMG along the Great Ocean Rd with nothing but an NA, a good set of tyres and a knowledge of where i'm going.