It's easy for me to sit here, WAY past needing P-plates (actually, they didn't have them when I got my licence, we still had the man with the red flag LOL) and say that P-platers shouldn't be permitted to drive hi-po vehicles. But it does need to happen, as part of a package aimed at reducing the overall road toll.
They have done it for bikes (250cc max), why shouldn't they do a similar thing with cars?
But the major component of the package has to be aimed at the skill and attitude level of the people we accept to share the roads with. IMHO, it is far too easy to get a licence. You are basically taught how to get the licence, not how to DRIVE the car.
IMO, it should be necessary to have passed an advanced driving course to get your off 1st tier Ps. Then perhaps an advanced driving course, or equivalent experience (such as club level motorsport) to get off your Ps totally. It would be easy enough for government to sponsor this, paid for by the savings in trauna treatment.
When I got my licence, there was a school holiday course for L-drivers. I attended, even though I had my licence. All my driving life, I have done what was necessary to improve my ability as a driver, to the point where i can proudly state that I have not been involved in a collision for more than 20 years, despite being an habitual "exceeder of the speed limit". I have trouble activating the ABS in my car, because I was taught how to "threshhold brake". I read the road by looking several cars ahead so I anticipate situations that might require sudden application of the brakes.
If driver training is not part of the solution to this problem, why is it that police forces around Australia and the world insist on putting their people through various stages of advanced car control.
The other part of the solution lies in what we are controlling - CAR = Concentration, Anticipation, Reaction. Without one, you can have none of the others.