ylwgtr2

Thats a bit harsh.....but it did make me laugh

well i must admit there was a "slight"prodding for the rotary there....however i was more going for the two strokes there!(possibly rotary )

well why is that the two strokes problem to have to suffer a capacity disability?(or are we basing things on 720degrees now)And wheres my extra capacity as ive lost some from having an exhaust port!!!!!

i have a CR500 two stroke engine here which the manufacture claims 491cc...it bore and stroke is 89mmx79mm...its exhaust port closes at around 47mm from TDC....i feel robbed of 32mm of combusting stroke and 198.61cc's:(

a rock spider crawls into tight crevace's.....and arse eater....well....im sure the other guy can give us a demo

how the f**k do i know?but she has great tits....now....heres a spoon....eat my arse

enough.....lets just wait till i finish my 250-300HP mazda factory PP engine 3924cc 3000rpm 2600cc,1308cc 9000rpm 450kg oscar sk90 racecar is finished and if the little hewland doesnt shit its pants and i dont stack it and if it doesnt blow it up and some spectator doesnt cop a 3000rpm or 9000rpm,654cc or 1962cc rotor in the mushki.....the lap times will tell if it sucks arse or not

i also had a thought last night.....not about what goes round and round or what goes up and down....but what goes in and out....

thats a cheap buy right there....and khoa....stop ringing me up asking if you can come around and blah blah blah....i dont swing that way mate

Ah yes...but imagine the vagina id have with all that saving $$$ on fuel huh???

fknell.....dunno about you guys....but if i wanted fuel consumption....id buy a prius

Im sure it was....i do get the point by the other guy about the hype...but i think its more to do with the average guy (no so much the guy that does his own engines/spannering ect) jumping on the rotary bandwagon....further more....he asked for my own experience....i wasnt at bathurst in 71....Its my memory of the early eighties,that they were quite fast after a bit of porting and the power to weight ratio of those paticular cars at that time were very impressive

i have 5 brothers and one sister and i remember in the early eighties i would have been around 8 years old and the whole lot of us were into cars and motorbikes....they all had friends of course and and i remember rx3's,rx4's,rx2's with Bridge port engines,murgo motors was the place to go,he would be constantly flat out with engine mods ect....i also remember my sister used to start the car in the morning and before the cat even had a chance to escape from sitting on top the front left hand tyre the car would be in 1st gear ready to take off...poor little engine

1988????please ,rotary hysteria as you call it was happening in the early eighties....

no....the e shaft is not a selectable ratio.....im for the piston engine and rotary engine with identical gearbox/diff ratio theory

10a,12a,13b all twin rotors with the difference in the thickness of the rotors/housings for capacity....13a engine is also twin rotor but shares the same thickness as the 10a but has a similar capacity to the 13b which they acheive by the swing of the rotor...20b is triple rotor....have a read here for the ins and outs.....rotary engine .....but hey....what would i know...i dont have a degree

ive never seen a 12a with one rotor

on the other hand....hands up who likes tits???(providing your hands free at the moment)

this has turned into a co(k beating competition....i dont have any qaulifications but i have and can use a cnc mill, motojig motorcycle chassis bench,full paint shop facilities,tig welder for titanium magnesium/alloy,autoclave/vacuum forming for carbon products.....can i whack off too???????Oh no....i dont have a piece of paper telling me i know how to use them....just product.....pfffft

may i be the first in this thread to declare.......