SilverECR33

contact a professional head porter, and show them, im quite sure they can fix that for you. without welding. although now that cheap manifold just got expensive. good luck.

Although, it does have a great engine.

Faster to what? break down?, or maybe faster than what? a parked skyline? dunno wat show your watching. But its slower around corners, slower down the straight. stock e.t's are also higher. because; a). its heavy, b). its shit. Take your pic. And im comparing to a GTST. Didnt think it was fair to compare it to a GTR. since a GTR is JUST totally out of the Soarers league..

Whilst on this subject. Im finding that , gaskets I need for this RB25DET only OEM available thru Nissan, been to repco and a few others, and acl parts lists, does not have listings for the gaskets I need. Exhaust mainfold gasket Intake Manifold GAsket Intake Sandwich Gasket (the one inbetween the 2 halfs of the intake manifold) Nissan prices are insane. its looking like im going to have to use them or use Gasket goop. Anyone know where to get other ones?

does anyone here actually know the specs on it? ive been searching the forums, But cannot turn up the results. Just vage claims . So far All I can dig up is. Hitachi Rear A/R is .64 Hp Rated - 280hp.

Pretty sure they tell you wat is the intended use for each of those products. Im no mechanic, Just a hobby for me . on engines Ive built. I use; Ultra Blue, - on water fittings, housings and gaskets. Ultra Black, for Oil fittings, sump. rocker covers or with existing rubber seals. Silastic *Black - If I were going to not use seals or rubber gaskets for an application. Permetex No.3 - Things that are for oil but use paper gaskets with small fine gap. Locktight 268 - for threads. I normally will just use OEM or aftermarket gaskets on fuel or air items, no liquid gasket adhesive.

Although This would seem the case, physically this doesnt change the compression does it? Its not designed to be there to get out the higher pressure from the turbo, because Ive seen this kind of profiling in not only turbo cars, but even n/a cars, or v8's with high comp + high valve lift. Cam profiles are normally ' these days' designed to scavenge the chamber to expell all the used air it can, without going into the next cycle, to effeciently discharge the chamber, to a certain degree depending on the type of cam it is ie. nitrous, turbo, na. vs duration.

Everyone has their own preferences, and depends on application. how much psi etc. I preferr alloy myself. but thats just my opinion.

Thank you guys, for your replys, But my question was not directed properly obviously, and i shouldve left out the 270rwkw part, out of my initial post, less to confuse everyone. forget response, and 270rwkw for a second, and lets concentrate on this part, given said that im aware there are a few variables to consider, like Heat, etc. But i just cant wrap my head around it properly. and looking for clarification, And disregarding even heat for a second. using those variables, which of the above would be more characterisitcally imposted on internals and why. does compression ratio fit into this equation? along with heat generated from the smaller turbine? what are the fundermentals on forced induction physics against compression ratios and the likely hood of detonation occuring.

Ok So flow would be better than PSI, possibly because of Heat distribution from the Turbo, Any other Reasons?

Sorry what I should have done to not go into turbine dynamics was refer to a Turbo as Turbo insted of Turbine or compressor. haha. Ill edit the initial post.

Thank you Edge, for your post, regarding turbo dynamics and flow. Hmm, I think the answer is A). PSI pressure (but this is my opinion, and i wasnt too sure) As during the compression stroke, with more PSI added you are raising the amount of compressed air in the chamber giving more compression during the compression cycle, although your physical compression on the stroke is the same. anyone? I was already leaning on A for this reason. But just Wanted some Clarity.

As topic States. I have looked for threads regarding this and although there is a mountain of reading on turbo flow rates and the likes, nothing i found that made it clear to me, as to which makes the most impact on the engine so, I was wondering; Just an Example If you had 2 turbos; For Example; Lets say a GT-RS and a GT30R; One comes in 52 Trim with a smaller compressor wheel and One comes in 56 Trim with the larger wheel. @ given RPM, the 56 with the larger compressor wheel and housing would flow more air Per/Liter, Than a 52 Trim, with smaller housing and wheel. For the smaller Turbo to match the flow of the Turbo to make the desired hp output, the smaller Turbo would have to work harder, to match the specified power at a higher PSI, and may not equally flow as much as the larger in comparison. Lets say you wanted 270 rwkw from your car. And either of the turbos could do it. But you Might Drive on 220rwkw daily, - If the Higher flowing larger Turbo, could flow lower Actuated pressure (PSI) for your desired rwkw - And the Smaller turbo needs more pressure (PSI) to match this rwkw desired figure.. What puts more strain on engine internal components, such as pistons, conrods, bearings, values, etc. whilst Underload, between either of the following. more PSI Pressure ? Or more FLow at a lower PSI pressure ? or does it have the same effect either way? And I'm way off the ball here Cheers,

what if it is the road?.. It could be haunted..

kuranda range.. , would be awsome to cruise down or up in a skyline, I envy you guys ayy I lived there for about 11 months long before i owned my skyline. loved it.

To Mafia, Cubes, Disco, Dale. If the 7 Blade would acheive more response down low. But suffer from 20rwkw up to possibly, what kind of characteristics would be expected then, if you sacrificed the rear a/r sumwhat. for example. Using the 7 blade option rather than 6, on the GT3076R in mafia's turbo configration (56Trim 60mm cover 76mm comp, .063 rear a/r in 84 trim.) to boost response, but using a rear housing arrangement of 0.71 a/r in 84 trim. to flow that extra bit up top. could this be a more benificial Ideal turbo configuration for this GT3076R.. I was thinking about getting one made up and giving it a try. ps. the .71 housing isnt a off the shelf item, its engineered thru CGC. and with housing made to suit the rb25det standard manifold. It seems a feasible option though, especially if they actually make them up and keep them on their shelves, people must be using them. But havnt read anything about them here on sau yet.

man that is tough. keep us posted when u hit the strip. love to come hear that Jet launch. *747*

no matter what they do, its still Fu*ked On Race day.

Bump Only reason im selling is I upgraded to 18"s

BUMP price drop $375 Guys these Rims and Tyres are in great nick, First to see will buy

Why bend over for the law yet again?... Sure you did a small skid, . but the mark is not from your car correct?. nor will it match. I would imagine alot of experts would agree, 'that to make a Cloud of smoke this would leave marks', you could possibly beat this. Good luck with that!

yea i change filter everytime, I mean, if you dont, Your just Mixing some of your old filtered junk back into your brand new oil.!

i use motul 4100 turbo light, about 50 bucks per 5 litres, and a PureOne filter each time i change, total cost is about $70 bucks

Yep, I have also, Apparently the shipment isnt too far away. im Excited!!

i do believe 6boost does, im quite sure he has a few kits and they included 35/40 setups on low or high mount, for rb25 and 30, give him a call to be sure, my memory is bad sometimes heh..