Checked the mail today, and lo-and-behold, there is a letter in the mail from the lovely QLD Police with a nice picture of my car on it, taken by one of their happy-snap vans.
To be honest, i knew it was coming, and was just waiting for it to arrive.... what did surprise me though, was what speed they show me as doing.... i remember seeing the flash go off, and i looked down at the speedo.... i was doing about 10kph less than what they say i was doing... and my speedo is pretty damn accurate (as tested on dyno's etc)...
anyway, i'm not going to whinge that i'm hard-done-by or anything.... there were external influences (i.e. the dickhead in the lane next to me wandering all over the road, nearly causing mass carnage, so wanted to get out of there ASAP) and i had a momentary brain-fart and put the foot down... just so happened that there was a speed camera there... i accept i was speeding etc etc, and that i'm the scum of the earth and a babykiller and blah blah blah as per the media.
As with everyone else though... if you can get out of something, i would like to...
so, what i'm wanting to know, are what criteria are there to contest a speeding fine, especially one from a speed camera.
There are several other cars displayed in the shot, one of them approximately 20m behind me... (the dickhead swerving all over the place)... someone once said to me that if there are other cars visible in the shot, then the photo is inadmissable, as its impossible to prove which car set the camera off? or are they speaking out their arse....?