Marco-R34GTT

Sit out the front on your old rocking chair with an old spray bottle, next time kitty jump on your car go to town on it with water... Bye bye pusseh....

That can be cured with 2 panadol, 1 - 2 litres of water and a bowl of good soup!

Yes mate, keen as mustard!!!

Nice one, cheers bloke! :)

Is it possible we could give it another go??? Alternate TF2 and CSS??? It appears there is a bit more interest here, I myself could definitely be more active as I'm no longer in hospitality... Try bringing it up again and see if you get the same kind of response as last tie round??? Would be nice to do something like that within SAU! :-)

http://en.espnf1.com/f1/motorsport/story/15197.html Pirelli express interest in F1 return.. They support Michelin's proposal for 18 inch tyres and a greater relevance for road and sports car racing technology... How could F1 say no to two premier tyre suppliers, with Avon as a third possibility.. Tyre war? BRING IT!

I came on three or four times, but at that point in time I was working in hospitality so it was a bit hard for me to be around at nights... Maybe we could alternate TF2 and CCS???

We should fire up the SAUWA CS:S weekly server again! That was a sick idea!

With a bit of Testarossa down the side and the pop-up headlights! :-)

Sorry for the minor hijack. However, in your opinion, which method of increasing displacement in an RB 25/26 to you know of has the 'best' stroke ratio of the available options??

and a box of kleenex

Think you guys have it all wrong, they need to get Cromps back and ASAP! Now THAT bloke understands racing, and doesn't prattle crap, when he speaks, people listen (if you heard P. Brock's eulogy you know what I'm on about). Even if it means bringing the V8's back to ten, so be it.. Just gives them an excuse to telecast 2 OneHD channels! :-) No more Cam, no more Rusty.. Don't mind Beattie but only in small'ish doses.. Trying to think of the guy that used to do it with Cromps, he is still at ten and is on the news, but his name escapes me, but I liked him a lot as well! Oh, and go Webs! .3 quicker than the rest of the field! Yeewww! Please Schumi, please set a time faster than Nico!!!

Wow, check these out for the R34 taxis! 4 door wide body kit??? Looks much better than URAS IMHO.... Can anyone else garner any info on APM??? Never heard of them, but I like their stuff!! Look, rear 4 door LED's as well!! http://www.apm.jp/index.html

There are a couple of good suggestions for 4 door rear LED's in this thread here.. http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Re...20&start=20

"My custom level on Little Big Planet was a perfect replica of Auschwitz!" Hahahaha, oh my son of rajab, so horrible yet so funny!

I guess you're making reference to Stefan Bellof and the fact that rival Jackie Ickx red flagged the race?? Either way, Senna's performance was nothing short of amazing in that crappy Toleman, even if you have to give Bellof drive of the day, Senna still showed his sublime skills in the wet. It would be like Loulou coming 2nd at Monaco in a Virgin... C'mon DJR, lets get a bit real eh. Feebly attempting to compare the potential of your aunties having balls and considering the possibilities of every leading car weaving like Hammo at Sepang is just as b*llsh*t as the weaving itself, total and complete rubbish imo. If EVERY leading car did what loulou did, not only would it deprive us of what little overtaking we do in fact see, it could potentially be absolutely disastrous.... His run up the pit-straight was compromised by poor drive out of the hair-pin, and exacerbated by the fact Vitpet got a good drive out of the corner and has his front wing tucked under Hammo's gearbox.. I still stand by the fact the weaving was amateurish nonsense, and a fair and partial display of loulou being nothing more than a spoilt brat of a manchild...

So Prost closing the door on Senna at Japan in 1989 was any worse?? Or Senna returning serve on the first corner in 1990??? Yet they get mentions as being some of the best drivers ever... Oh wait, they aren't Schumi... Soz my bad... There are so many examples of wonderful racecraft by Schumacher it is nearly pointless naming them all.. I'll add Hungary 1998 to that list, even so, tell me of another driver of modern times that could of done that? Maybe you'd recall Japan 2000 in patchy weather as another example of astonishing MS racecraft. Schumacher is a spectacular driver, for all his misgivings, but don't go kidding yourself that he was the only F1 great with particular flaws. Not everyone in F1 is a Stirling Moss FYI. Really, is Machiavelli the first bloke that popped into your head when you thought of candidates for giving satan a BJ??? Sheeet, you're as delusional as your homeboy hammo.... @Redline. He may not be mentioned as much as in previous years (BMW days), but for the most part I'd say the Koob is quite well liked here! For me he's certainly in my top 5-6 drivers on the grid presently! In fact, given the right car, the right team and the right tools, he could definitely win a WDC or two in my book. It is especially a pleasure watching him on the defensive, in a way he reminds me of Jean Alesi or even Schumi, being stubborn as all hell. NO MAN SHALL PASS! I like that, when it doesn't involve weaving like a twat..

Hhmmm, obviously your definition of racecraft and mine are totally different. Senna at Monaco in the toleman 1984 = Racecraft. Senna Monaco quali 1988 = Racecraft. Senna at Donnington 1993 = Racecraft. Schumi finishing 2nd at the Spanish GP in 94 with only 5th gear = Racecraft. Schumi 1996 Spanish GP = Racecraft. Sebvet at the 2008 Italian GP, winning in a Toro Rosso = Racecraft. In terms of overtakes, strictly speaking. Mika on Schu, Spa 2000 = Racecraft (and balls). Hamo's display at Sepang = B*LLSH*T!!!!!!!!! I'll quote some drivers for that matter: I ask you this, imagine if EVERY passing attempt was met with such amateurish weaving?? The track would be utter madness, and no overtaking would actually occur, for fear of initiating a massive prang. That was not racecraft, anyone that has either raced or has followed it long enough knows that. 1 and 1/2 moves (one defensive move and a half move to partially get back onto the racing line) and that is that. Braking zone or not, I hope I never see that cr@p again, by Loulou or anyone else on that note.

Well I think it is fair to say that it is true that the Mac has the highest straight line speed of all the cars on the grid (thanks to the Merc engine and F-duct). However, Petrov did get better drive out of the hairpin and was tucked up pretty close to loulou's gearbox, he would've been getting a decent dose of slip-stream up the straight, so in that sense the Renault had every opportunity to retake position much like the previous lap. Horses for courses I suppose, whether it is lewis or not I don't care, just because I don't like him much doesn't mean this is a witch-hunt, if it had of been Petrov doing it to lewis, I may well poke some fun at loulou, but I'd be having a fair crack at Petrov, or any other driver for that matter, Webz, Sebvet, Schumi, Nando, anyone... It is just unfortunate for loulou that he is regularly finding himself involved in these silly predicaments...

The braking zone isn't brought to question, as you said, the event occurred no where near the braking zone. However, Hamilton's reckless weaving prevented Petrov from making ANY move and deprived him of any 'safe' opportunity to overtake, what was hazardous that the cars were accelerating rapidly and at that point of the straight they would still have been going awfully fast, and as such, a prang between the two could have been potentially horrendous. Imagine if every leading car weaved like Hamo did? Chaos would ensue, and there would be some almighty pile-ups, it would be little more than open-wheeler F1 NASCAR.. That is one thing I NEVER want to see. At worst a little cheeky?? You've got to be kidding! If Petrov had called the bluff and sailed up next to Hamo, only for them to have collided, I wonder if you'd be saying the same thing???

Exactly, pulling alongside someone weaving so erratically would be as daft and idiotic as the weaving itself! In all seriousness, as if Petrov really had any other alternative OTHER than to follow Homoton and has ridiculous weaving. If doucheton had half a brain he would've gone to the pitwall and held his mac on the inside line, if in fact Petrov didn't have the speed as claimed, then Ruskie would've not had a chance on the outside. I find myself becoming more and more repulsed by this robotic twat, a few people here and a lot on crash are claiming that he did it to break the tow and was not 'blocking' as such. If weaving in that fashion had PREVENTED the following driver (in this case, Petrov) from attempting an overtaking manoeuvre, then could that not be deemed 'blocking' on those grounds??? As Savman said, as if Petrov was dumb enough to try, that would've caused a catastrophic accident at such speed.. I fear a dangerous precedent may have been set in Malaysia, I hope that 'IF' the next example of this is displayed, it is crushed with impunity, punished severely, and no longer left to blight this already badly tainted sport..

Personally the weaving was bollocks. I bet if that was JPM he would've got whacked with a stop-go! A drive through would have sufficed however.. What he did was foolish, dangerous and most unnecessary in my opinion, such demonstrations only serve to further my dislike and distaste for Loulou, as such he isn't doing himself any favours by continually placing himself in such polarising positions..

75% race distance IIRC..

Only in the dry this rule applies, for the prime/option tires.. Well I'm pretty sure anyway. Oh, and COP THAT SH*T WEBBER HATERZ.. Bring it home P1 sonny! Please Schu, show us some of that old wet weather magic!