luke gtr

and wheel spacers....and turbos falling off

this.and when I ride, I keep to the opposite side, so I can see on coming traffic. I ride on the road(when no brake down/bike lanes are available), and move onto the mud/grass/gravel when a car does approach. I want to see them coming. that way, I can react accordingly. I also dont wear a helmet (lets not get into that debate atm), and have never been booked for not. but... if I do get booked, my reaction will be taking an entire lane the entire trip. because, thats the law.... dont ride much anymore, so doubt it will ever happen. aaand, go...

no, you dont.but you do need one to put it into your name....

and how do we stop repeat offeders?its not like they have a license we can take... the vehicles are cheap and dont require a license to buy. and if going through a speed camera, there is no way to identify them.

fixed the post.coz gays are oks. hipsters are not.

can I please grab a lift?dont know if clutch will hold for the trip.

id go UP TO 15k depending on other factors ie wheels, cage, brakes, the right colour. there are a few factors that come into it.

youre on too much money if you can afford gtr and alcohol....

where is this?

ive heard of many others being booked from "inadmissible" video.also, I believe its illegal to travel too slow in a car, as you become a road hazard. would this not apply to a bicycle?

im not a cyclist, but I would be happy to pay a tiny bit extra in tax for these cycle ways to be constructed in known high danger areas (to start with), and more places as the years go on.

if cars werent identifiable, do you think the crime rate would stay as low?and bikes already block entire lanes. ive been stuck behind them. with double lines, no room for overtaking so traffic builds up. its illegal to drive too slow in a motor vehicle, why not bikes travelling too slow? to me, the solution is more bike lanes. so riders can use them instead of being on the road. I also like the idea of number plates. we know they wouldnt pay much for rego, but would also require a rego check to make sure the bike is in good working order. ive seen alot of bikes in my area with one or no brakes, putting themselves at risk. and yes, its mainly themselves, but self protection is the reason helmets and seatbelts are law. to be honest, I dont think there are ever going to be any winners in this argument. either way, drive and ride safe peoples.

good to hear. now, start driving it and enjoy!

keep up the good work.

so, anyone get any great bargins?

which is all you need.what if the car had been out of rego for 20years? whos going to have the old papers? you need a written receipt with all the vehicle id numbers on it.

the blue slip inspector shouldnt even need proof of ownership. hes carrying out an INSPECTION. you will need proof of ownership when at the rta. I bought a starlet gt. didnt take any paperwork with me. obtained blueslip.

nepean motor group.

I dont normally like red cars.but gaaawd daaamn thats hot.

this is sooo cool. if for a 32, would buy.

can get both with a t4 divided rear.gt42 with 0.96, 1.12, 1.22 options. hp with 0.81 and 0.96 options. the exhaust outlet is bigger on the gt. gt42 is obviously a larger front cover. but, considering the same rear housing (0.96), would there be any difference to spool time or outlet temps? has anyone done back to back testing?

well, you had a party to attend....

screw it, going gt42 cover.

holidays start at noon

easy suspension removal