Don Dada

aaaaah my thoughts exactly...... Was writing when u posted. And again, where can i one of those?

Yeh i figured the one with the angle will allow for more clearance as seen here The one i pictured above and all others i have seen that is recommended for the Rb however doesn't seem like it would work without modification. The holes on both sides are threaded so i guess it was designed to work with studs on either side which will be fine for the turbo side but impossible to bolt to the manifold because even if the thread is drilled out the hole is sooo close to the wall it would not allow for a stud to fit especially where the wastegate flange sits. Someone on another forum went through this and was left to weld the adapter directly to the manifold The one "Foolboost" posted however seems like a better option although i think the wastegate flange/type might be a little too big....44mm right? Anyone know where i can get that type of adaptor??? Thanks.

Is this a something u made or is it pre-fabed?

Don't have the turbo but i'll see if i can get some dimensions off Garrett site. This looks sweet though...

Its nothing but two T3 flanges connected by a piece of hollow section with a 38mm wastegate flange on one side...... can be fabricated pretty easily if u ask me...... the mechanics of it however is a bit questionable... And spend the extra dollars on what?????

Its in a C35 Laurel chassis sooo... i do believe i have more space than a R33 Gtst chassis This is the only pics i have thats kinda showing the area

Is is a ebay part and i have no evidence what so ever of its results.... kinda why i asked the question in the first place Anyway i had the same concern with the ex gas venting at a 90* angle but i guess its ok since it vents where all the ports has already merged and in a common chamber. The other ss ones that alot of ppl seem to be using vents from a common chamber also, but at 180*.... ie. in the total opposite direction of the air flow As i said i have seen no results but it just seem as a very convenient option instead of using a high mount or welding a pipe for the ex gate off the stock manifold.

What do u guys think of this thingy to mount a Gt3076/GT3037 on the stock manifold? Couple of points to note.... 1) No internal WG so no f@&kin around with actuators and dump pipes for proper boost control. 2) No excessive heat in the engine room from using a ss high mount as the original heat shield can be reused. 3) No headaches to pull off the ss to repair when they crack 4) No need for a spacer to clear the compressor from touching on the manifold. 5) Everything just bolts up with new gaskets 6) Cheaper 7) Did i mention it was cheaper? And the cons..... 1) Will it clear the strut tower with added 2.5" or so added to the side? Does any one have pics with the Gt3076 mounted on the stock ex manifold using either this or the normal flat spacer??? What do u guys think?? Thanks.

Try another ignitor or make sure it is properly earthed

You're a brave man!

Ha ha!.......What good would that be when tuning!?! I'd prefer driving my car without the speedo working than have no rpm indication!!!

Well if it so easy to set up on any given dyno then everyone should request rpm instead of speed, since it makes it a lot easier to compare results and speed having no other real benefits

Not sure about the other dynos but i know on the dynojet it's just a matter of hooking up the pick up around the loop on the back of the engine for the rpm. For example, it would just make life sooo much easier to see at what rpm the turbo is on full boost without having to do calculations if u know what i mean!!!

Yeh.... but how many cars still have stock rims and tyres??? Rim and tyre size vary far and wide so an rpm reference will be more accurate when comparing against other cars........well on paper at least.

Is there something that I'm missing out on???.......If so pls inform me but........ Why the F@$k dyno sheets are done with speed instead of rpm?!? To me i find it verrry annoying and makes it somewhat impossible to compare response and overall results of different set ups.

Don't waste time ,effort and money that could be spent on something else Lots of ppl here making 280rwkw+ on standard manifolds.

Yeh..... apparently they are 4 hole like the OEM and Nismo so should be just as good at a fraction of the price. The 440cc yellow side feed out of the JDM Legacy twin turbo is - 16611AA231

I assume this is JDM spec as only the JDM Legacy came TT right? Does anyone have part nos. for the US spec Sti and the Jdm Legacy yellow top injectors so we can compare???

anyone???

The Rx7 needs a collar to work and the connectors are different also. S15 are verrrry hard to source here so its not an option. I can confirm 90% that the Subaru yellow tops fit in the rb25/sr20 rails without modification and i know the USDM Ej25 STI has these said injectors just need to confirm if the JDM spec out of the Ej20 twin turbo Legacy are 440cc or 550cc for the same yellow tops. Some part numbers for the two would be nice!!!

Ok guys after doing some research it seems like the Subaru side feed yellow top injectors can work on the 25det Alot of Sr20 guys are doing the swap and says it fits as oem in the rail, are high imp,and just the connectors are different. The problem is a little confusion over the USDM which claims their own is 550cc or thereabouts and the JDM spec which is 440cc for the same yellow tops The JDM seem to have this on the EJ20 twin turbo out of the Legacy an the USDM out of the STI. If this is true i can't believe there is no info on SAU to support this...... yes i've searched!!! Anyone have any further info on this???? Sounds like a better option than the rx7 side feeds that need the collar to work.....and not to mention cheaper!!!

Ok guys after doing some research it seems like the Subaru STI side feed yellow top injectors can work on the 25det Alot of Sr20 guys are doing the swap and says it fits as oem in the rail, are high imp,and just the connectors are different. The problem is a little confusion over the USDM which claims their own is 550cc or thereabouts and the JDM spec which is 440cc If this is true i can't believe there is no info on SAU to support this...... yes i've searched!!! Anyone have any further info on this????

high imp.

Anyone know exactly what collars are needed to fit the 13B side feed into the 25 rail? Does it have to be sard or are there any other options? Also i see sard has two different sized collars... one for the the 550 and one for the 850. Thanks.

I remember sydneykid saying to use locktite or similar to prevent them backing out. How tight do u need to do them up in the head??? Is there a torque spec for that?