Piggaz

^^ what capacity? Spec list?

Tuned on it and turned it up yet?

SS8_Gohan cracked 400 with a single Nismo on corn syrup IIRC.

Might warrant some corn syrup then

It's a drop in the ocean considering it's one of the main parts directly influencing power delivery.

For 500 KW ATW? Two will be heaps and heaps!

Any idea what it made before?

Off the centre IIRC.

Yes it will. Seen it on more than one setup, both Nismo and factory units with duel 044's.OP, you'll be fine although it's not needed.

How much are you gonna pay for it?

Couldn't hear it. All I heard what that farken pump. BBBBBZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZBBBZZZBBZBZZZZZBZBBZBZZZZZX

nope. Bog stock -5's .

2.6 = 60's. They're still a 400 hp turbo each. The threshold might not be much on the V6 3.0 but it might be a different story on a shorter stroke engine minus 430 cc. The bigger engine will soak it up, the 2.6 needs all the help it can get.

How big is big?

Can't. Blew my gearbox up lol

Simon, in that first video it sounds like they're surging (not shuffle but surge). It could be just the video though. I have just done an overlay between your graph and mine. Obviously its a little rough but I was going up in 250 RPM points.At 4500 RPM we are the same, you overtake by a rough average of 20-30 kw then fall away at around 6300 RPM. Different dyno's and whatnot so it isn't the most accurate thing. Now, if you went from 550 WHP to 632 WHP (on this sheet you posted) and nothing else changed, then that is farken silly. Can you remember what boost level the -5's were running to achieve that? I spoke to the guy that tunes my car and he said to go the 63's. Now considering the -5's are a 360 HP turbo, 60's are a 400 HP turbo and the 63's are a 430 HP turbo, I'm not sure if I need the 63's. The 60's should (on my engine seeing that the -5's have already done 472 rwkw) do 500 with a much better curve to match (as you have not given away anything at any point), couple that with a 250 degree at 11 ish mm lift and it would be silly. What I am really curious about is that throttle response/lag between gears. It doesn't exist! Also, Gav from WA went from -5's to 63 mm GTX's and the last time I spoke to him, he was going to go the 67's. I wonder where our little rear housing is going put the white flag up and call enough?

Got an off the shelf kit ready to go? If so, how much?

When will you get the engine?

Say helllllo to twist

If they were -9's then they should be making more than 100 kw at 4000 RPM.Something is Definately amiss.

Very strange choice for a RP car, that's for sure. If it had a curve like that with massive 272's it would have been stupid with a cam in the 250-260 range, for sure!

Haha!!!!Do you know what cams were in it? There is still a little lag after a gear change with the -5's. It's funny because the 63 mm GTX is a larger wheel than the -5 comp wheel.

I'll play around with the graph tonight. Obviously different dynos and stuff but it will give a good indication.If they're 63's one could only wonder what the 60 mm curve would look like. Who did the machine work on the comp housings? You are an evil man posting stuff up like this! Compared to the -5's, what was the on/off/on throttle response like? Noticeable difference to the normal cast -5's?

Simon, were those runs done in 4th gear? It looks like it but it looks like it's only running to 7300-7400 rpm. In assuming 265/35 x 18 tyre with stock diff ratios.

I wouldn't believe that for a second otherwise the smaller versions wouldn't exist.