Piggaz

Didn't take you long haha

Cheers karnt. Yeah, running round on semis and a stock sump isn't the smartest idea. Us NSW guys and our SBS (sump baffle syndrome) as Ash likes to call it

It's a.... Different diff. They don't have clutch packs in them, they have gears. Gav and R32TT (Matty) have them in their cars and love them to bits. They do the same sort of driving as what we do so that was good enough. Time will tell.

Any info about this mate or is it a little hush hush?

http://www.hks-power.co.jp/en/products/engine/rb26_vcam/index.html Click me ^^^

HKS do make them still There are 3 versions. The first 1 uses a 248 degree cam @ 8.7 mm of lift and swings 30 degree's. Step 2 uses a 264 @ 8.7 mm lift and swings a little more. I think its 50 degree's Step 3 uses a 264 @ 10.0 mm lift and swings 55 degrees. (This is all off the top of my head so it may not be spot on) I have asked the question to the guy from HKS that built my head over the past 12 months which version I should use. On a 2.8 with -5's he recomended the Step 2. Hope that helps.

A few goodies turned up today. First my crank Second my quaife front diff centre. Pistons arrive next week sometime. Sump will be dropped off to Racepace in Melbourne to get modified to their specs. 9.5 Litre oil changes will get exxy!

This is whats wrong with the Nissan CAS. A log from my own car.

67 mm versions. Considering the result Gav made with the 63 mm versions (500 rwkw at 26 psi), this will be one wild ride! Tial housing? Whats different with them and why the decision not to stick with the housing's that come with the HKS and Garrett versions of the large low mounts?

So tell me why im a measly15 kw behind you on smaller turbo's on less boost..? 2.0 bar trailing back to 24 psi im at 24 trailing back to 22?

I like how you seem to know more about my cylinder head than myself seeing that its now a "standard head". Ring up Yavuz now and he said himself the night we were tuning "450 is just a intake cam twist away" and that was with baby 5's. We were going to go for a 'hero run' but for what? Satisfy some bloke on SAU? Look at Racepace and their king dick engine that is 1.5 seconds slower around Winton than a V8 supercar. Makes more power than your's on 20 psi on 98 with a curve to die for with 449 kw. But I spose that setup is crap too because it didn't crack 450? Gav made 462 rwkw. Ryan 1200 is at 440 with 2530's. But hang on....... What sort of "GUN" setup needs to be driven in 1st to make the car move To the OP. After seeing the results on N1GTR's car with a DIRECT COMPARISON (ONLY thing changed was the turbo's) between the high and almighty RS's and 5's there is no comparison. It's comical and just downright rude! I will not be posting the graph as it is not mine to post. This discussion and argument has been had many times. It just goes round and round in circles. There is a reason why the 'circuit' guys got rid of the RS's... that thing called area under the curve. Which curve would you rather? Since went onto make 620 HP at the treads. "Oh but 5's have no top end". Yep The ONLY result that I have seen over the years that has been awsome with the RS's was Diemar's. He said himself that you need a huge dollar head to get them to work properly and that's something that most guys wont do.

When I first bought my car MOST of the shuffle was out of it. I put on a duel entry ARC cooler (and lost my BOV return pipe so the BOV's were blocked off) and that was an outright disaster with shuffling.

Seen the results of 3.0 with RS's and -5's on the same engine. Its not even fair, actually it's a joke. If they're lacking top end it means your setup was ineffecient/shit. 2530's/-5's lacking top end? Rightio. 450 on my engine was only a intake can twist away but I didn't want to loose midrange. My 2.8 results are enough. 125 kw extra through the midrange and 25 more up top. Gav made more midrange with 5's and made the same up top (the went onto make 620 rwhp). It's a discussion/argument that's been had many times. "but I'll feel you in with my peak Powah". Yep.... Average power > peak power. Whatever makes you happy...

Got rid of the rubbish RS's. Would not go back to them if they paid me!

So really it's a 3 inch exhaust.

That's what I said man. Area under the curve. Peak numbers are pub talk!

2.6 = SS's/-9's. Without a big dollar head and setup. 2.8 and bigger = -5's. It's that simple, unless you're a nuckle dragger 'drag racer' that likes 'peaky power' which feels quicker.... Then they get smashed around twisties by a car that has 100 KW less peak figure. Average power will belt peaky power every time AND be easier to drive.

If you want lag, go the -10's/RS's ALLLLLLLL the junk result you want!

Jez, for shuts and giggles overlay your E85 results with 9's.

I'm surprised they didn't say 'single' and hang up! Haha

You wouldn't know, you have a decent ECU

What ECU do you have?

Got a photo Brad?

Sarcasm mate. I should have put a '' in there haha

Do a search on -10's/RS's on here. Don't do it!!!! What about GTX versions? Gav just made 500 KW with the 63 mm versions. It does mean custom intake piping.