bigmikespec

http://www.harlow-jap-autos.co.uk/AMR33GTR035.jpg is this the part right at the front of the bonnet? R33 bonnet lip - $50

How low does the Trust one sit? Although it might be at risk, a deeper sump is a better design than something that just has more volume by being wider on each side.

A turbo with a compressor map

I don't really know what he wants to achieve? But if I was doing a street engine 500hp I would keep the duration close to stock and make sure there was no overlap (as there would be high back pressure relative to boost), go higher on lift without going silly and make sure the profile opened the cam fairly aggressively. I might just choose the top spec Mines cams to be honest... If you could get the above with Kelfords little offset trick then sounds good. PS: Quaife front and rear or go home! If you own a GTR, you can't be a tight a$$, lol.

Good words bro. Swirl and tumble in a 4-valve sounds good too from Kelford.

It is not what I think, it is proven and documented. It might not be applicable for 99% of people on this forum but don't discount it as not possible or not achievable. It has been done, people are doing it! If you seriously are interested then PM me and I can answer what ever question you have; don't just bash me with condescending questions then say 'I'm out'... come on dude.

That's fine, I get that. At the opposite spectrum having higher boost than exhaust pressure is achievable and using camshafts with longer duration and appreciable overlap works to improve performance/power. At ultimately higher rpm, more rpm... more power (derr).

Response? Not important below 4000rpm if you never drop below there. I will just let you know when I do it!

You haven't seen it happen? Must not be possible then That last comment is a consequence of higher duration and not necessarily reason to do it! Zeb, are you on about raising static comp to compensate the dynamic comp drop when you go longer duration cams?

When I get to it I will measure it not to prove it to anyone but having higher boost than manifold pressure is what I want to achieve and I won't know without measuring.

I am very sure, PM me if you like. When boost pressure is higher than exhaust manifold back pressure (very few other than flat out race engines get this right) then you want overlap.

I mean a hot NA cam... big duration and lift.

If you have a 1:1 ratio of exhaust manifold back pressure to boost pressure (or better) choosing an NA cam is a good place to start!

Come on more block mods for RD28

Rail returned to surge or main tank?

Are you an industrial designer or an architect? (i.e. non-engineer)

GTX4294 would be my pick!

I thought the FMW was a S362 only? RB26 forged engine, lots of head work, dry sump, trick intake manifold if I ever finish it, lol.

I would go with a GTX4294 if I had my choice again. I think my S366 with 1.10 A/R should make the same power you are after (I hope). These have the same size wheels as the 9180 but doesn't have the fancy stuff... but, a $800.00 price tag instead of triple that.

PM sent

GTRUK has a build thread for it, a lot of work put into it.

Looks good, I asked Kyle if he could do a manifold like that but twin scroll... looks like it would be challenging!

Going for his 'pro-mod' manifold?

Are you talking about the Tomei +1.0mm lifters/buckets PS: what a retard double post sorry fellas

Are you talking about the Tomei +1.0mm lifters/buckets