jangles

Were CRD looking at it on an engine stand? My guess is no, they weren't looking for hard to find cracks, as Jez didnt find them for 2weeks? Plus its all second hand parts and it went back to get the tune fixed, not the engine out?There's nothing saying the cracks were there when the used part went back on. We all know cheap manifolds, even non cheap tomei manifolds crack.

Anything that will put you at a total calorie deficit over x time period will work. I've used IF (intermittent fasting) before. I enjoyed it. 5-2 is by no means a break through though. He just used everyone else's work and bastardized it a bit and marketed towards a mainstream audience. Read 'Eat Stop Eat' if you want real science behind it.

Ben told you the outcome in post #6 what a wizard! haha

My figures were the same 3 states away.. Pete doesn't feel his are inflated.

Post your graphs for him mitchee.

How? Winding more into it?

Will gtx2860 fit in -7compressor covers without the sleeve? Rears are smaller than -5,-10s, how about the front?

Surely he is trolling. Ask's for your graphs.... Says they are shit, but then still claims it's not your car and must be a different turbo and stroked - suggesting it's good. All in the one post.

These are 6466 results

Power figures are within 5kw at both 18psi and 24psi to my rb30. Looking forward to 30psi tune!

GTX2863 are not bolt on. He says in the opening lines what the comparison is and goes through all the pros and cons. Haven't most of the graphs of gtx turbos proven they don't spool quicker but they make more power? So using an older gt style 3582 would just not make as much top end

The original one is in this thread. The car hasn't been to another tuner yet. But you'd know that, because you'd read a thread before commenting.

Around the same

You'll probably see 550 Australian horses if you've been looking at our graphs. More if in USA

I only recommended AI after I looked and thought the nuke was external only! Nuke will do the job just fine!

I know, but everyone is aware by now that they are albeit the same thing. If anything, 2530 will flow more We are talking turbos. They will/can/have do/done it.

If you really want one, sell that one and get an Aftermarket Industries, SP800, or the 1200. holds pumps in tank, less clutter. Pumps can be staged so you aren't returning all the fuel at low power/rpm. or do what GTRNUR said,

Leave it as it is and run 25-28psi through the 2530's, like piggaz did to make ~470kw People were making that power on those turbos 10yrs ago.

Can you get a copy for here? Turbo musnt even be working yet on that setup.

6466 1.0 divided.I make 433awkw on 22psi, 98 100kw more on e85 Should be plenty to run 9's

800cc on 98, around 800hp

A rb30 usually adds about 500rpm response all things equal... My cams are bigger than yours, so you could possibly base it off that. I'm using a 1.0 divided housing. I don't think it will be bad, certainly better than a T51R in response, even if it does flow more top end. Thats the beauty of new technology. If you're worried about response though your are probably better off with a smaller turbo, unless you have a power figure you definitely want. Take into account the 6466 is a 600awkw turbo

They'd have the same power at least.

How do we know if the theory is incorrect if it hasn't yet been proven otherwise? I would of thought the bigger dump/front pipe not making a difference was a good indication that the restriction is further up, ie. Turbo