jangles

yeah, -6 are the fittings it can come with, but has those extra holes to set it up how you please.

Read the info!! Factory feed and return to tank, Pump to rail, rail to surge. How long would it take to completely empty 1l with an 044, plus 2m of line, with nothing returning to the surge? It's designed for far smaller cars, but, It would be a far better option than just installing a pump by itself. It is never uncovered until zero fuel. 2xpumps paralleled would make it a 2l surge,

I'm serious though

It's says 12mm bungs to allow various configs, What size are most fittings/lines people using? I'm sure it could be modified to suit bigger. You'd need two if you were going serious e85 power, but then youd probably just have a conventional surge setup anyway, Even two would be still quite manageable and neat I'd think though.

stumbled across this. VW/audi world is ~4 diameter, ~8.5" long http://www.034motors...nk-p-21527.html

possibly

The balancer #1 And then any crank damage you've done while popping 3 engines Those billet things are just a pulley, pointless.the 'balancer' or 'dampner' does just that, dampens harmful vibrations.

after watching you yesterday im definitely going the little bit further with my road car so i can particpate in something like this. standing on the sidelines really gets you keen!! well done!!

only concern i have is surge, twice the pumps, twice the chance of surge? ( using the above setup )

Is everything else engineered? Also current exhaust isn't 'legal' so why isnt varex an option?

using a stock ecu would be worse for the engine as a whole.

When you decide to not be 'lazy' use the aftermarket with correct tune

They've have that for ages though... All new materials sounds interesting though

There was talk/movement of making the drive splined. The current design works, but a spline design similar to the 2j engine will be a much better thing.

pm xrated and he will educate you!

^^^ this

Yeah,I'm with it. obviously needing injectors and z32. I never thought they make ~200 with just a turbo slapped on.

explain in further detail? Please..

This is what i was saying. get a builder that 'knows' how to make them work if you want to use GT-RS' The correct cam selection, port job, secret squirrell stuff, that usually isnt revealed, to make things work. The guys with years of experience building and tuning similar/different combos will make them work. oh and $$$, If your builder hasnt had the experience to make them work, you will just end up with a not so good result with them, where as the -5 would of achieved a similar feat. we can tell you to put 290 degree cams in it, but if they dont match the specific port/head work. its pointless.

if you really want to use those turbos, i wouldnt be asking on a forum for ideas on if/how to get it to work. Youre better off going to a good builder with a reputation for making things work and ask them, hand over your $$$ because once youre up there getting the max out of something, its takes every little bit. everything counts. Piggaz and N1GTR are up to mid 400s with -5's, they have well sorted setups. most people net mid to high 300s... its the setup as a collective

You also don't state you have a fmic, which most do.

He means your rwhp figure is closer to an engine hp figure... Therefore your rwhp figure is actually ~100hp higher reading than what other dynos would suggest... Making what youre producing closer to 633rwhp You shouldnt have to go on another dyno if you answer if GM gave you the camaro's whp or engine hp. Because if they gave you an engine power figure (what factories usually Tdo) then you're figure would be spot on with what is being said. And as this is skylinesAustralia, he was just giving everyone a heads up that it's not as high as what most of us thought it was.

paint both rattle white?as they wont colour match anyway? or rattle black, or go get heaps of stickers and look fully JDM

I believe he took your statement as you saying ' if it ain't our dyno then it isn't worth having one' Did GM say the camaro make 'xxx'Whp or 'xxx' hp? Because factory statement is usually engine hp. Which is greater than WHP. Guilt toy was pointing out to the rest of us that this rwhp figure given is inflated in comparison to rwhp that we usually see.

bump