Jump to content
SAU Community

jangles

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,148

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    100%

 Content Type 

Everything posted by jangles

  1. jangles
    Your setup will be next level again to mine
  2. jangles
    RB30, 6466, 23psi With the 235/40R17 195km/h is ~6850rpm, 115 is ~4000
  3. jangles
    There was never any mention of head components, just capacity.
  4. jangles
    Requires less rpm to make same power with any given same turbo.Stock cranks will go to 10k no worries
  5. jangles
    It says if. Also, everyone else is saying it is soley the tuner/tune. So how are they any different when it comes to being 'narrow minded'
  6. jangles
    The 6466 see's over 600kw under 30psi on 2.6 and strokers.A stroker means less rpm more than anything As for blocks need grout etc. Many cars over 1000hp don't and haven't
  7. jangles
    I think he was more leading towards that being a possible reason its like it is.
  8. jangles
    You can adapt and make any coil work, with or without separate ignitors
  9. jangles
    Thats your conclusion.
  10. jangles
    What workshop was he from?
  11. jangles
    Post #1033 on page 52Edit: you said boost graph
  12. jangles
    Will be interesting to see what it puts out at 30psi. Take into account that graph has a very restrictive exhaust setup so probably not much above 30-32psi with something free flowing? I'm only guessing
  13. jangles
    Back on Topic, a 6466 would/should/will go very close to your 850hp number on 30psi. A high comp 2.6 down here makes 608kw on 26-28psi he runs 35 on the track.
  14. jangles
    I've seen brand new cars off the showroom floor break as well. Got a thread on what makes the 2.7 different from a readily available off the shelf 2.7?
  15. jangles
    Thats a 20odd psi safety margin. 1000hp on stock girdle and no sleeves isn't an issue. Especially as its only going to be pushed sometimes.
  16. jangles
    Why only 30psi? What fuel? If e85 why are you limiting yourself?
  17. jangles
    3.4 stroker I believe, but that won't affect peak power much It was only a ~6500 rpm run apparently as the dyno wouldn't run past 230kmh for some reason. Unsure of rear housing, but assume it's a bigger one.... 3.5" exhaust, with gate plumbed in, so, far more potential to be had yet. Also, I ran my car and it was fairly consistent with how it was tuned on another dyno.
  18. jangles
    My boost tapers off on paper too.My speed doesn't when I'm driving.
  19. jangles
    Saw a 6870, albeit on a supra, pull 705rwkw ~36psi on mainline dyno today.
  20. jangles
    Would it really need it? being a street car and such a responsive setup
  21. jangles
    We aren't saying you did want big power. We are saying that the other guy is off point by suggesting another builder would have it rev to 9k with the same parts
  22. jangles
    Will definitely tell us! If not, I can highly recommend a 6466!
  23. jangles
    I haven't yet needed/been able to to rev mine past 7000, maybe I'm driving too soft Pete! Would be interesting, but I doubt it can flow much more air than it currently does at that rpm on a big capacity, hence why dump mod didn't change much?
  24. jangles
    It was Pete's choice to have it this way. Don't be sorry because you don't like it.
  25. jangles
    I agree, which is why I can't work out why people still want/expect it to be making 700hp
×
×
  • Create New...