wilorichie

Show us your car man - I'm pretty much on Holidays this and next week I should be able to get Yen to come... Meet up before hand again dionacle?

Too much of that crap going around at the moment... Some pretty bad stuff. GL mate

Next chance I get to come (Hopefully tomorrow) I'll be dragging mine along

lol don't deflate the bubble yet!

Speaking of the ladies... do any turn up for icecream on thursday? Was trying to get my misses to come with but I'm having a bit of difficulties on the persuasion

lol - my typing has failed me there! That you haven't had a bit of a chat is all. But yes, it was a little bit of shit

Martin, sounds like you haven't had a bit of a with this chick before

That's a sweet photo Pierre

Will have to make some time to drive up and meet you Chris! See what you think needs improvement hehe.

My wife's Jazz was outside yesterday afternoon and happened to have a nice background

I'll tell my wife to start looking in the garage seems she wants another dog.

I suppose that is funny, because before I posted this thread, of course I did a bit of Googling - And the first 3 articles I read, is why you should shoot JPG. I had decided just before that, I wanted to shoot RAW and I wanted to read an article telling me this was a good idea! Simply because it is easy to downgrade, but not possible to upgrade (Photo editing stage). The first 3-4 posts (including yours, FST) have given me more than enough confidence that RAW is a much better decision than JPG - And I have happily made the switch

Woo! Haven't been to an SCC since 2008... I miss my sticker

That was my first place in mind - but after further thought, how is the space? There are only very tight car parks which are generally very full... As in, you can't move the car into a nice spot, cars will be right next to yours etc... Do we actually have places as described? lol

Where do you guys normally head to for some afternoon shots here in Brissy? Trying to come up with a place to head out to which is generally quiet peaceful - Nice background - city lights would be awesome. And hopefully a bit secluded Cheers guys

Pretty satisfied with my choc mint thick shake Wish the car park wasn't so full! Wanted to get a snap shop of the circle lights in a row hehe

Haha nice. Looking forward to it Is there much lighting on the cars, or are they sitting in the dark?

Haven't been to baskin and robins in a while... Hope they still do those really thick, mint thick shakes ... not those crappy watery "thick" shakes

Ah cools - The smaller groups are always more fun

How many generally attend tomorrow nights Ice-cream? Look forward to meeting you guys/girls

I was just playing around with the graph - very cool indeed! When you say '3 stops' what am I looking for here? That one I'm not sure on sorry. My camera is one of the entry level canons called a 1000D - I do have a decent (Well what I would call decent) lense on there though so I do expect quality photos - But unfortunately the photographer is lacking a bit haha. I do like the fact that RAW images could fix under or over exposure better than JPGs. Is there any other benefits that you guys know about? I see each RAW file is 10 meg and a copy of the JPG also sits there at around 3 megs. So this 13 megs in total instead of 3 megs. Which roughly a 4gig card should hold approx 300 photos. Nick, do you find RAW much easier to work with than the JPGs? Thanks for your time and help guys, I really appreciate your knowledge.

So do you use RAW or JPG matt? When do you use these? Do you always have the graph up? I have a 4gig card... I think my card might not be big enough to always use RAW. I generally always like to use the highest quality setting because I can downgrade later, but with my 4gig, I thought I'd ask you guys what you think first. RAW feels like it takes about 1 second longer to save/process... I feel this might get annoying.

Don't tell me his car still hasn't been returned to him! That's truly depressing

But if you over expose, raw or jpg - it is not fixable? ie: a white t-shirt, if over exposed is just a big white thing in the shape of a t-shirt - if I make exposure darker digitally.. it just makes the whole shape of the t-shirt darker and the details within do not show.. or wrong? Sorry didn't see your question before: I use photoshop