Current model Audi cars (due to the use of electronic handbrake) require the use of a scan tool to retract the rear brake pistons to replace the pads; a mate who works for a brake specialist was refused any assistance from Audi, unless he paid over $800 to a stealership. They also told him that the car's warranty was void because "specialist safety work" had not been undertaken by Audi, and they couldn't guarantee the quality of the workmanship.
Three hours on the internet looking for a procedure, and a software patch for the scan tool; and they were able to reset the dash light and replace the brake pads, which were a $250 part.
Imagine if Audi could sue the mechanic and the scan tool maker for breach of copyright? What about the bloke in the US who was quoted $4400 for a replacement battery pack for his Prius?
He was able to simply clean the terminals and busbars in the battery pack and it was fixed in a few hours with basic tools.
Sorta serves him right for having a Prius, but it proves that with ingenuity and innovation we don't have to be at their mercy. Now they want to change the rules and use the law to penalise clever innovative individuals.
Imagine if Toyota could sue him for using "non genuine parts" to repair his car? http://jalopnik.com/the-dealer-wanted-4-400-to-fix-his-hybrid-he-did-it-h-1685721487