Jump to content
SAU Community

slow13dude

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    415

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

 Content Type 

Everything posted by slow13dude

  1. slow13dude
    Pull the 4WD fuse out.
  2. slow13dude
    SAU is good at keeping threads clean. For mass Pwnage and flames go to nissansilvia.com
  3. slow13dude
    Because you're used to full-time 4wd and if you try to drive the GTR like that it will bog.
  4. slow13dude
    LOL, yeah those Japs love their Gunmetal Grey!!!
  5. slow13dude
    wow, 6 minutes - you're impatient!
  6. slow13dude
    Since you've got 2 and you can only drive 1 at a time, why not let me have 1?
  7. slow13dude
    Agreed. The "average" GTST would be under 200rwkw. The "average" GTST I think would be around 230-250 kw @ the fly. As long as that 6L HSV can get traction it should win a lot of drags. Do some weight reduction and it's even more formiddable.
  8. slow13dude
    You will want the 4wd controller for the GTR to adjust the distribution of power to the wheels.
  9. slow13dude
    6L. Wow, that's a big engine. We mostly choose turbo Skylines over big NA for the following 3 reasons: 1. Ability to double power output from a smaller engine 2. Smaller engine = less weight 3. Skylines handle better than "Aussie" cars But good luck to you.
  10. slow13dude
    LOL, yeah I'm certain Ford knows that forced induction beats NA and the power was deliberately kept conservative and below the V8 output. Lots of V8 bogans out there that would have hurt feelings if the XR6T came from the factory with more power than the V8.
  11. slow13dude
    Some people are forgetting that the Japanese deliberately used smaller displacement engines with forced induction for reasons like weight and racing class restrictions. It's all maths, of course the XR6T has more power potential than the Skyline engines, simple displacement + forced induction.
  12. slow13dude
    Assuming the cop can pick the difference between a GTR and a GTST and knows that the GTR should have 2 turbos.
  13. slow13dude
    Nothing wrong with the VR4 Galant
  14. slow13dude
    My money's on profiteering. See the 89 GTR thread.
  15. slow13dude
    I hate my Nismo 320Km/h speedo. Only ever use a third of the range!
  16. slow13dude
    Ah OK, thanks
  17. slow13dude
    Speaking of rust... I had a little bit of rust on the rear quarter panels on my R32 GTR. But why do aluminium panels rust? I thought aluminium was a non-rusting metal???
  18. slow13dude
    I say make the sacrifice and go live in NZ for a year! (personal import)
  19. slow13dude
    OK, I see Mazda is also populated by morons: FD RX7 Years Available: 1992 to 2003 Engine: 13B (1308cc) twin rotor (2 x 654cc) EFI Twin Sequential Turbos with Intercooler Hardly 30 years ago.
  20. slow13dude
    Agreed. Most 89 GTR buyers are trying to make a buck out of the ignorant! However, I'm in the 1% of buyers that actually bought my 89 GTR for me.
  21. slow13dude
    The GTR was designed to win the Group A racing class.
  22. slow13dude
    Sorry, I have an 1989 R32 GTR and I have ABS.
  23. slow13dude
    So basically Rexbo, a single turbo is preferable if done properly, but a lot harder to get right (tuning, development, engineering) than just using a twin-turbo system?
  24. slow13dude
    Ah yes lag. The price of being able to get 1000+ hp out of a 2.6L engine.
  25. slow13dude
    I'm not calling you a liar, however you haven't explained why the engineers persist with the twin-turbo setup if it's a waste of time.
×
×
  • Create New...