Luk

So according to you EVERY single fine issued is correct. Cameras are ALLWAYS set up correctly according to the manual. NEVER affected by “environment” – other moving objects and so. You surely don’t believe that… I didn’t admit I was speeding. But EVEN if I was, I don’t need “don’t’ speed” advice. I was questioning information which should be part of the photographic evidence not my driving. So please keep to the topic. Thanks.

Yeah, so what if it was set up for traffic coming towards the camera and I got in the way. There is no room to put the camera on the other side of the road and they might have wanted to measure the other line… Even if it was me, it’s just 7km over the limit and my first fine ever, so with all the respect I don’t need to hear “don’t speed” advice. But I don’t want to pay for something I haven’t done, if that’s the case.

Picture is of the back of my car. But there is front half of the other car right next to mine in the background which I guess might have triggered the camera as well. Unless they can set up the camera to be triggered just for in/out coming traffic without being affected by the other direction. In that case, there should be a mark on the photo, I would say.

Hi. Can somebody tell me how to find out from the photographic evidence of speeding from WA, if the vehicle which triggered Multinova has been traveling forward or away from the camera? There is no "F" or "A" letter like they have in eastern states on their pictures, just something like "-" (minus) or "~" in front of the speed (number). There are two cars in the photo. Mine traveling away and the other towards the camera in the further line pretty much at the same angle to the camera, so I am wondering if it wasn't the other car which was speeding and mine was photographed instead. Thanks.