Scooby

The bigger BM57 will give you slightly shorter pedal travel and a harder pedal so while the stocker will decrease harness and increase travel it shouldn't be excessive or spongy. The movement when you turn the engine on is it 'sponginess' or 'travel' because the booster is getting vacuum?

Sin Stocker should work fine with the Brembos. But then so should BM57, what's the issue?

day

indecent

A crank? Male or female? How big is your boot?

Sold.

Sold pending payment

Presumably a sump breather can only work if it's vented to atmo? Otherwise it'd be sucking out of the sump on boost.

G'day everyone Done a search, even found an old thread I started years ago on this topic but at that time no one really seemed to know the answer. Car is an R32 GTR. We've all seen catch cans that vary in volume from the Nismo oil/air separators that are prob the smallest, to the Greddy type, to the type that mount in front of the battery on an R32, to the type that displace the battery on the 32 all together and are prob > 2 litres volume. Anyone have any evidence-based recommendations for volume? Also wondering if anyone is running a dedicated sump breather line that goes from the sump to the catch can? Cheers

More PMs replied

PMs replied

open to reasonable offers on the turbos.

bump

Thanks Duncan Fellas... Let's be cool. Hopefully we can all learn something from this thread, which is the way we were heading. I understand CRD is prepping for Superlap so it'll be a while before I have anything else to report. In the meantime if anyone has input re the power levels, and sustability of power levels over extended use, of the R32 GTR ic bring it on. Also keen to know if anyone has data logged intake temps during a track day. Ash your offer to do a back to back would have been a major data getter. Offer still valid? Cheers

hey hey, nice work

Hey Chris any update on this? Cheers Mark

OK to set the record straight the potential issue is not flow but maintaining power levels after extended use. As for suggestions of overservicing, which I detest, there's no evidence of that in this case that I can confirm. Jim is not pushing this. Re the fuel pump, for what CRD would make out of it I doubt their next million is going to come from making $100 here and there on fitting pumps. The figures may well indicate that there was an issue. But seriously they've done everything I've asked and no more. Always thought conventional wisdom was that a 32 cooler was good for 350 rwkw, the 33 and 34 a bit more. But then Ash has seen a lot more tracked GTRs than me so the wisdom I'm referring to may well be a crock. Marko I'll be in touch re the cooler pending the feedback I get this week. Cheers

pump sold to fryzmen

still running the stock ic so talking to them about that too.

They're still refining the tune so I won't know the exact details for a while. Once I get the dyno chart scanned I'll post it up. Steve-O I haven't driven it yet, it's an in-betweener with their other jobs as I'm in no hurry to get it back atm. Cheers

Hi everyone Just got a dyno print of 351.4 rwkw but no info re afr/psi/rpm. I'll post something when I know. Cheers Mark

Hi fryzmen still keen to sell I'll msg you. Other PMs replied. Cheers

Still available. Turbos now 1700 firm.

Jim says the torque is the thing that's sucking fuel and the current pump isn't up to it for an RB30 with my config. He can get it to 300awkw but that's it. He's got a test kit with a 044, hooked it up and reckons the difference is significant. He's sending me a dyno graph with the current set up so I'll post it up when it arrives.

I'm sure when I call Jim he'll have the answers, he hasn't failed me yet. Just single tank, we haven't talked power I've just left him alone what he gets is what he gets. Been itching to do -5s and custom cams from the start to satisfy my curiosity so we'll see how it goes.