Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've never seen a GTS with an oversized cooler loose any thing

over a STD core, but as the turbo is usually changed at some

stage a big core is the best option,The GTSt I posted earlyer

has a 700HP core and is better everyware, not saying the car

would not have been better with a 400hp core, just look

at the future plan.

  • Replies 130
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

There are a number of people who have experienced a notable drop in response , even though they pick up horsepower, by fitting overly large intercoolers to stock turbos. Not everything performance wise is there on show on the dyno printout, unless your goal is to win dyno shootouts I would not take them as gospel.

Assuming you do plan to move on to bigger things later fitting a 700HP cooler for a planned output less than 700HP is pretty dumb in hindsight.

Looking at the future plan is all fine and dandy but, c'mon most of these guys still could have 'aimed' at some power figure. As they say ' aim at nothing and you hit it every time'.

Steve, I think you'd agree with me on the idea that a 44gal drum takes longer to fill than a 2L icecream container.

At some point an oversized intercooler loses the race against time to fill the volume in between the turbo and the plenum. The rpm for full boost is the same (therfore no lag, cause the turbo spools at the same engine speed). However the 'time' to achieve engine speed (which is greatly assisted by being on boost) is affected by the larger volmue and distance required by the oversized intercooler.

The stock intercooler is not real flash, even for the stock turbo, but if you are going to spend the best part of $2k on a replacement make damn well sure its the right size.

As you mentioned before the person with the 700HP intercooler would have been better off with the 400HP unit (if thats his eventual target). Maybe the 400HP unit was cheaper as well?

At the end of the day $2k spent on a 700HP intercooler(with std turbo) will put your car firmly in my rear vision mirror, with my poxy standard intercooler, over a 1/4mile, when our cars have the same mods. Get a 300HP unit plumbed up right and it is a different story.

Just want people to think about how important the size matching idea is.

Agree about the BOV too Steve.

BTW mate do you know the flow on the standard unported RB25DET head?

shuto-boy,

a BOV is a BOV, it's just that the factory one is quite good. I don't think an aftermarket one can't work as well fullstop. It's just that it seems difficult to do so (or selction of brand plays a part). If you like the noise thats what you have to do anyway I guess.

got it rev,thanks.Vspec,ure kidding right?how can anyone in the right mind produce that.Must be hot in the usa,they got lots of wierd stuff there.

Right now i got a 12 psi stock turbo+Fmic,going to change ecu soon,ill post some results

13.6

-outlaw racing team-

hate drugs,love racing

Steve,

It makes sense, the factory one has a small air bleed (hole on the underside) people mistake for the factory BOV not holding boost at light cruise due to it being so-called 'too lightly sprung for high boost apps'.

There is someone with a thread about blocking the hole off on the performance section!

rev, piss-off bitch. I'm not a ricer, the sticker are to add power, and the wing to keep my ass on the ground:lol:

I have already replaced the stock BOV, and don't have any issue with my aftermarket one, so I'll keep is, besides I love the sound:P

See'ya:burnout:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think my main complaint with your idea is that there is a veneer of idealism spread across it. You want the simple numbers to make it easier, but all they will do is make it easier for someone to come to the wrong conclusion because the fine details will kick them in the nuts. As it is right now, the tiny bit of arithmetic is NOT the obstacle to understanding what will fit and what will not fit. The reality of trying it is what determines whether it will fit. If you had a "standard rule" that R34 GTT guards have that magic 100mm space from the hub face to whichever side you were worried about, and someone said "excellent, this wheel is only 98mm in that direction, I'll just go spend $4k on them and jam them on my sick ride".....they would just as likely find out that the "standard rule" is not true because the rear subframe is offset to one side by a fairly typical (but variable) 8mm on their car and they only have 92mm on one side and 108 on the other.
    • It still combines inches with mm, especially when you have .5 inches involved, and mm and inches that can go in either direction. This would give a clear idea on both sides of the rim, right away, with no arithmetic. Even better if somebody gives you the dimensions of the arch of multiple cars. i.e GTR may be 125mm, a A80 Supra may be 117mm, or something along those lines. Yes, you can 'know' that going from a 10in rim to a 10.5in rim with the same offset moves both sides about 6mm, but you still have to 'know' that and do the math. Often it's combined. People are going from 9.5 +27 to 10.5 +15. You may do the math to know it, but if it was going from (I had to go look it up to be sure) 241mm/2 - 27 - 93.5mm from the center line to (more math) 266/2 - 15 (118mm) from the center line. Versus 93mm vs 118mm. It's right there. If you know you have a GTT with 100mm guards you can see right away that one is close to flush and the other absolutely won't work. And when someone says "Oh the GTR is 120mm" suddenly you see that the 10.5 +15 is about perfect. (or you go and buy rims with approximately 118mm outward guard space) I think it's safe to say that given one of the most common questions in all modified cars is "How do offsets work" and "How do I know if wheels will fit on my car" that this would be much simpler... Of course, nothing will really change and nobody is going to remanufacture wheels and ditch inches and offset based on this conversation :p We'll all go "18x9+30 will line up pretty close to the guards for a R34 GTT (84mm)" but 'pretty close' is still not really defined (it is now!) and if you really care you still have go measure. Yes it depends on camber and height and dynamic movement, but so do all wheels no matter what you measure it for.
    • But offsets are simple numbers. 8" wheel? Call it 200mm, near enough. +35 offset? OK, so that means the hub face is that far out from the wheel centreline. Which is 2s of mental arithmetic to get to 65mm to outer edge and 135mm to inner. It's hardly any more effort for any other wheel width or offset. As I said, I just close my eyes and can see a picture of the wheel when given the width and offset. That wouldn't help me trust that a marginal fitment would actually go in and clear everything, any more than the supposedly simple numbers you're talking about. I dunno. Maybe I just automatically do numbers.
    • Sure! But you at least have simple numbers instead of 8.5 inches +/mm, relative to your current rims you do maths with as well, and/or compare with OEM diameter, which you also need to know/research/confirm..
×
×
  • Create New...