Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I don't see why a crank collar properly fitted would not be good enough for 500hp.  It costs half as much or less 'but I might as well throw $500 in the river since I'm rebuilding the engine anyway'.  Note sarcasm - not rudely meant, just easier to use.

Also those pistons will not likely be lighter will they?  More likely the opposite.  Dunno about the rods.

:P No offence taken. I don't really want to throw $500 away on anything either. It just seems to me that to go to all this trouble while the motor is out and so on, and then pop the 12yr old crank back in - which has had to be modified (possibly weakened at this point?) - in the scheme of things $500 was good insurance... but hey, that's exactly why I am asking the question - to see what others have done/think on this.

Pistons I thought were lighter going to the forged items over the stock cast ones -aren't they?

The crower rods are about 200g lighter than the stock rods. (recently another was done, and my engine builder weighed them both).. so all this means less stress on the crank I would think.

once you fit the collar etc its still gonna need to be machined before goin back into the motor.

thats where the new crank works out near enough to the same costings, without the wait of workshops :P

The weak point on that crank is the oil pump drive which the collar deals with.

How is the crank getting weaker with age? A new crank is never perfect anyway, it still needs some machining.

Also please note I tied your 500hp power figure to my statement.

Forged pistons are generally heavier than cast but you are making up for it with those rods - whether you need them or not is another story.

But I am not going as full on as someone building an outright race car either.

if this is so....you dont really need the motec and cdi....i have a brand new power fc pro which may suit your application better....could do a swap perhaps. pm me for a chat if your keen to work something out with me.

Edited by DiRTgarage
How is the crank getting weaker with age?  A new crank is never perfect anyway, it still needs some machining.

If cranks are anything like engine blocks, my understanding is that there are distinct advantages refreshing a used item from a metalurgy point of view, that is, the used item has already hardened and done any warping/etc.

Anyone more knowledgable then me (ha! that's not hard :)) care to comment?

The weak point on that crank is the oil pump drive which the collar deals with.

How is the crank getting weaker with age?  A new crank is never perfect anyway, it still needs some machining.

Also please note I tied your 500hp power figure to my statement.

Forged pistons are generally heavier than cast but you are making up for it with those rods - whether you need them or not is another story.

Fair enough. I suppose it was just my thought that perhaps the crank may have suffered some fatigue over that time. If not, and in keeping with what Lucien says about the metallurgy point of view - perhaps it is better to simply keep that one?

I'm all for saving the money if it really is no advantage.

if this is so....you dont really need the motec and cdi....i have a brand new power fc pro which may suit your application better....could do a swap perhaps. pm me for a chat if your keen to work something out with me.

:( Cheers for that, but I guess I meant I am not a "no limit to budget, out and out race car". I still intend to be 'racing' as much as I can.

Part of the reason I have Motec and CDI is because that what my tuner is most familiar with, and secondly - he sponsored me. :( He probably wouldn't like me to give it away like that. But thanks for the offer anyhow. Now if you want to swap a veilside front bar for that nice stock one you have - that's something I'd be interested in! :D

Forged pistons are generally heavier than cast but you are making up for it with those rods - whether you need them or not is another story.

I just weighed the stock pistons in at 440grams - and the JE replacements are 335grams according to the specs.

25% less, or 100grams per pot saving - using this particular piston. Got to be good.

Take another 200grams off per rod and the crank surely is having a better time of things at 8000rpm - not to mention the faster spin up time?

I just weighed the stock pistons in at 440grams - and the JE replacements are 335grams according to the specs.

25% less, or 100grams per pot saving - using this particular piston. Got to be good.

Take another 200grams off per rod and the crank surely is having a better time of things at 8000rpm - not to mention the faster spin up time?

I notice your using JE pistons what made you choose these?

I ask because I have a dilema of using JE's which I got at a good price or sourcing Weisco's which have teflon coating from the factory, which apparently are a closer fit and less noisy from cold start.

All advice appreciated.

Edited by Sinista32
I just weighed the stock pistons in at 440grams - and the JE replacements are 335grams according to the specs.

25% less, or 100grams per pot saving - using this particular piston. Got to be good.

Take another 200grams off per rod and the crank surely is having a better time of things at 8000rpm - not to mention the faster spin up time?

Well that's interesting. Has anyone got a pic of the JE piston lying around?

Do they have short skirts?

I went for the wiseco's recently for the abovementioned reasons basically. Teflon coated skirts from factory, clearances are smaller than some, fairly quiet compared to some, nice long skirts for keeping square in the bore, not expensive.

This weight saving says to me you have even less reason to get a new crank.

Just my opinion.

Well that's interesting.  Has anyone got a pic of the JE piston lying around?

Do they have short skirts?

I went for the wiseco's recently for the abovementioned reasons basically.  Teflon coated skirts from factory, clearances are smaller than some, fairly quiet compared to some, nice long skirts for keeping square in the bore, not expensive.

This weight saving says to me you have even less reason to get a new crank.

Just my opinion.

Yeah I hear what you're saying. Perhaps the JE are thinner and/or have shorter skirts. (I've always preferred shorts skirts.. not just in pistons either...)

I'll have to see if I can get hold of one and post some pics. I don't think the JE have any coatings like the Wiseco's either... I was thinking of having them ceramic coated - but thats just the top, not the skirts.. How much are the Wiseco's?

I notice your using JE pistons what made you choose these?

Frankly, it was just what my engine builder suggested. He's always had a like for the JE stuff. I once used them in a V8 too. But to be honest - I'm sure the Wiseco are probably just as good. And I like the sound of the teflon... I'll ask him about it and see what he thinks, but I know he did say that most 'good forged pistons' these days are all very good.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
    • But I think you missed mine.. there is also nothing about the 98 spec that supports your claim..  according to the fuel standards, it can be identical to 95, just very slightly higher octane number. But the ulp vs pulp fuel regulations go show 95 (or 98), is not just 91 with some additives. any claim of ‘refined by the better refineries’ or ‘higher quality fuel’ is just hearsay.  I have never seen anything to back up such claims other than ‘my mate used to work for a fuel station’, or ‘drove a fuel delivery truck’, or ‘my mechanic says’.. the actual energy densities do slightly vary between the 3 grades of fuel, but the difference is very minor. That said, I am very happy to be proven wrong if anyone has some hard evidence..
×
×
  • Create New...