Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I don't see why a crank collar properly fitted would not be good enough for 500hp.  It costs half as much or less 'but I might as well throw $500 in the river since I'm rebuilding the engine anyway'.  Note sarcasm - not rudely meant, just easier to use.

Also those pistons will not likely be lighter will they?  More likely the opposite.  Dunno about the rods.

:P No offence taken. I don't really want to throw $500 away on anything either. It just seems to me that to go to all this trouble while the motor is out and so on, and then pop the 12yr old crank back in - which has had to be modified (possibly weakened at this point?) - in the scheme of things $500 was good insurance... but hey, that's exactly why I am asking the question - to see what others have done/think on this.

Pistons I thought were lighter going to the forged items over the stock cast ones -aren't they?

The crower rods are about 200g lighter than the stock rods. (recently another was done, and my engine builder weighed them both).. so all this means less stress on the crank I would think.

once you fit the collar etc its still gonna need to be machined before goin back into the motor.

thats where the new crank works out near enough to the same costings, without the wait of workshops :P

The weak point on that crank is the oil pump drive which the collar deals with.

How is the crank getting weaker with age? A new crank is never perfect anyway, it still needs some machining.

Also please note I tied your 500hp power figure to my statement.

Forged pistons are generally heavier than cast but you are making up for it with those rods - whether you need them or not is another story.

But I am not going as full on as someone building an outright race car either.

if this is so....you dont really need the motec and cdi....i have a brand new power fc pro which may suit your application better....could do a swap perhaps. pm me for a chat if your keen to work something out with me.

Edited by DiRTgarage
How is the crank getting weaker with age?  A new crank is never perfect anyway, it still needs some machining.

If cranks are anything like engine blocks, my understanding is that there are distinct advantages refreshing a used item from a metalurgy point of view, that is, the used item has already hardened and done any warping/etc.

Anyone more knowledgable then me (ha! that's not hard :)) care to comment?

The weak point on that crank is the oil pump drive which the collar deals with.

How is the crank getting weaker with age?  A new crank is never perfect anyway, it still needs some machining.

Also please note I tied your 500hp power figure to my statement.

Forged pistons are generally heavier than cast but you are making up for it with those rods - whether you need them or not is another story.

Fair enough. I suppose it was just my thought that perhaps the crank may have suffered some fatigue over that time. If not, and in keeping with what Lucien says about the metallurgy point of view - perhaps it is better to simply keep that one?

I'm all for saving the money if it really is no advantage.

if this is so....you dont really need the motec and cdi....i have a brand new power fc pro which may suit your application better....could do a swap perhaps. pm me for a chat if your keen to work something out with me.

:( Cheers for that, but I guess I meant I am not a "no limit to budget, out and out race car". I still intend to be 'racing' as much as I can.

Part of the reason I have Motec and CDI is because that what my tuner is most familiar with, and secondly - he sponsored me. :( He probably wouldn't like me to give it away like that. But thanks for the offer anyhow. Now if you want to swap a veilside front bar for that nice stock one you have - that's something I'd be interested in! :D

Forged pistons are generally heavier than cast but you are making up for it with those rods - whether you need them or not is another story.

I just weighed the stock pistons in at 440grams - and the JE replacements are 335grams according to the specs.

25% less, or 100grams per pot saving - using this particular piston. Got to be good.

Take another 200grams off per rod and the crank surely is having a better time of things at 8000rpm - not to mention the faster spin up time?

I just weighed the stock pistons in at 440grams - and the JE replacements are 335grams according to the specs.

25% less, or 100grams per pot saving - using this particular piston. Got to be good.

Take another 200grams off per rod and the crank surely is having a better time of things at 8000rpm - not to mention the faster spin up time?

I notice your using JE pistons what made you choose these?

I ask because I have a dilema of using JE's which I got at a good price or sourcing Weisco's which have teflon coating from the factory, which apparently are a closer fit and less noisy from cold start.

All advice appreciated.

Edited by Sinista32
I just weighed the stock pistons in at 440grams - and the JE replacements are 335grams according to the specs.

25% less, or 100grams per pot saving - using this particular piston. Got to be good.

Take another 200grams off per rod and the crank surely is having a better time of things at 8000rpm - not to mention the faster spin up time?

Well that's interesting. Has anyone got a pic of the JE piston lying around?

Do they have short skirts?

I went for the wiseco's recently for the abovementioned reasons basically. Teflon coated skirts from factory, clearances are smaller than some, fairly quiet compared to some, nice long skirts for keeping square in the bore, not expensive.

This weight saving says to me you have even less reason to get a new crank.

Just my opinion.

Well that's interesting.  Has anyone got a pic of the JE piston lying around?

Do they have short skirts?

I went for the wiseco's recently for the abovementioned reasons basically.  Teflon coated skirts from factory, clearances are smaller than some, fairly quiet compared to some, nice long skirts for keeping square in the bore, not expensive.

This weight saving says to me you have even less reason to get a new crank.

Just my opinion.

Yeah I hear what you're saying. Perhaps the JE are thinner and/or have shorter skirts. (I've always preferred shorts skirts.. not just in pistons either...)

I'll have to see if I can get hold of one and post some pics. I don't think the JE have any coatings like the Wiseco's either... I was thinking of having them ceramic coated - but thats just the top, not the skirts.. How much are the Wiseco's?

I notice your using JE pistons what made you choose these?

Frankly, it was just what my engine builder suggested. He's always had a like for the JE stuff. I once used them in a V8 too. But to be honest - I'm sure the Wiseco are probably just as good. And I like the sound of the teflon... I'll ask him about it and see what he thinks, but I know he did say that most 'good forged pistons' these days are all very good.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey guys I’m chasing a Rb20det complete or bare block need a good running engine as mine has low comp 
    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
    • 95 is just a scam outright. 98 is the real "premium" with all the best detergents and other additive packages, and at least historically, used to be more dense also. 95 is just 91 bargain basement shit with a little extra octane rating. Of course, there's 91 and there's 91 also. I always (back in the 90s early 2000s) refused to put fuel in from supermarket related fuel chains on the basis that it was nasty half arsed shit imported from Indonesia. Nowadays, I suspect that there is little difference between the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the "bargain" chains and the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the big brands, given that most of it is coming from the same SEAsian refineries. Anyway - if there's still anything to that logic, then it would apply to 95 also. 98 is only made in decent refineries and, as I said, is usually the "premium" fuel, both in terms of octane rating and "use this because it's good for your engine because it's got the unicorn jizz in it!".
×
×
  • Create New...