Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 285
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Man those vids are schweeeet....... quick question thou... Any thoughts on how the KKR430 would perform on a RB25? You say the boost is great on the RB20.....just wondering if it would be a bit laggier on the RB25.....??

  R33Deviat said:
Man those vids are schweeeet....... quick question thou... Any thoughts on how the KKR430 would perform on a RB25? You say the boost is great on the RB20.....just wondering if it would be a bit laggier on the RB25.....??

I would of thought it would be less laggier. Though i think the KKR480 would be better suited. I think Otomoto state they have gotten 260rwkw (could be wrong lon this figure) from the 480 on an RB25 neo

Thanks guys, yeah was a typo with the KKR480 / KKR430. IObviously the KKR430 would be less laggier on the RB25 as it is a smaller turbz on a larger engine....

As replicate answered (cheers champ) was wondering about the KKR480 on the RB25 in a bit more detail than what is listed on their site....

KKR-480

Suitable for larger 2.5–3.0L engines, this turbo features a twin-entry T3-size exhaust flange, which is also suitable for normal T3-flange manifolds such as RB25DET or RB30ET*. Rated at 480hp, it uses the same compressor design as the KKR-430, but a larger turbine and housing better suited to high-boost applications up to 20psi. It uses a 2.75in V-band flange for the exhaust outlet.

Tested by Croydon Racing Developments on an RB25DET Neo engine, it produced 242kW at the wheels at 18psi. The standard internal wastegate is designed to hold 14–15psi.

Just trying to establish if the is much modification required to fit the KKR480 to the RB25 as there is for the KKR430 to the RB20.......

Pay an extra few $$$ and get a straight bolt-up Garret.......

Oh well such are the dilehmas of the 'turbo game'

Ando

  simon-ae86 said:

COOOL!!! you own an 86??

please have look at my 86

MY LEVIN

or click the banner in my signature.

thank you.

are you member on ae86drivingclub?

  KAWAII_hachi_roku said:
COOOL!!! you own an 86??

please have look at my 86

MY LEVIN

or click the banner in my signature.

thank you.

are you member on ae86drivingclub?

this is a cefiro section : Ur car is teh ghey !

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From my youth: GTi-R clutch change is a massive pain. The gearboxes are fragile? But the car is super cool and I want one 😢 
    • Remember this is 1988 tech.
    • Driveline vibration is resolved. I ended up loosening all my engine mount and trans mount bolts, giving it a good shake then retightening everything and it's gone... Let's just say I was surprised that fixed it.  I've been happily driving it around again but unfortunately put zero time into my direct port/constant pressure WMI setup. I'm on vacation next week, so I'll try and finalize it then.  On a different note, I spent all week fuel/ignition mapping 2x 216L V16 engines. Turbo's were burning glycol and we swapped them out for larger units. We also had planned emissions testing on site, so I figured I'd be there the same week to use their instrumentation and massage any emissions issues out if needed. This was a first for me. Fuel management is similar in certain ways to automotive (i.e air density as load variable) but very different in others. It's all PLC based and AFR's are controlled by air and not fuel. They use a control valve between the turbo and air manifold to control pressure which in turn controls AFR's. Due to this, target AFR tables supplied by the OEM are in pressures and not mass which really through me off. They use air pressure vs fuel pressure tables. I also relied on an O2 concentration sensor the emissions team had in the exhaust. Ignition timing was also all over the place and we were losing a fair bit of power. They're now happily sitting at 16-40BTDC depending on load. We were making about 1600kw at 900rpm at 90% load. Engines were running a lot smoother as well.    
    • heh, aint no R32 ever meeting modern targa cage rules unless the driver is veeeery short OP, good luck with the sale, since its already in the land of freedom I'm sure you will find a good buyer.
    • meh, it was a good video, clear about the issue and how he dealt with it. A bit heavy on the RTV and very brave to put an RB in anything without rebuilding it first, but otherwise I thought it was good Dose, I'm not sure that having the pickup forward is a big issue; yes of course the oil could shift under brakes but the sump should never be empty enough for that to be a problem (unless you also have a higher volume oil pump, and that oil can't return from the head to the sump quickly enough)
×
×
  • Create New...