Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ah sweet as. yeah i think i do rember you. yeah my car is sitting at midas right now. dean is just finishing off the extractors today.

yeah you might see it out the hutt on thursday. i will have been for a long drive before then to start the run in as i will probly thrash it at some stage being around the skyline guys as they will all want to see what it can do.. lol

good to hear that your car is running again :P

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

yeah wazz i know thats the worst thing to do. but also nanaing it is just as bad. i have planned out my first trip in the car. will involve alot of accelerating and decelerationg and change of load as i will be going over hills etc.

i think i can have the 1,000 run in ks done in a week and a bit. if i have the time.

yeah definatly will try to get some audio of it. probly will need to change the rear muffler from the stock turbo one im running now. seems to have good flow and is nice and quite.. just a little ratly i think.

fuel consumption

hwy driving 9.5 ltr /100 km and better ( 10.6 km / ltr )

city driving 10.8ltr /100 km  (9.2 km / ltr )

Gawd damn.... Doesn't appear to be any difference in fuel economy between turbo and N/A.

I've only just had gtr injectors and a new genuine 02 sensor dropped in, trimmed back the pfc fuel correction to 58.5%, instantly it began getting 11.6L/100km's.

Had it all tuned up and now gets a nice solid 10.6L/100km's of city driving.

I'm pretty much just cruising around 90% of the time, occasionally I give it a little squirt that has it turning the rear's easily in second gear. :)

So it is driven fairly easy.

Prior the old crappy 260cc injectors were causing hard starts and slight flat spots on the tip of the accelerator pedal. Fuel economy was wofull. ~14L/100km's.

On the stock ecu when the injectors were ok it was managing ~11.1L/100km's.

cheers for the advice. especialy cus im planning on starting the car on thurs. will definatly be an interesting time. have to rember to keep using the brakes. not the engine as i usualy do.

yeah the fuel figures will be interesting to see how it all pans out.

ok well i got the car back yesterday. iv had a few little problems. all but one i have delt with now.

the car cranks, has fuel, injectors are working, not sure about the coils yet.

but the problem is the ECU is coming up with the error code 34. so that is about the knock sencers. that doesnt suprise me as the loom was cut on only the knock sencers. but i have solderd it up and still no luck. im really frustrated as no body knows what to do to fix it.

i have attachd a pic of what im talking about. the brown wire has the clear wire inside. but it has silver wire on top so i dont get how it works and what the silver wire is there for as its not grounded on anything. and it just stops abruptly(checked that on the rb20e knock sencer wire.)

post-23121-1140155316.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...

she lives!!

oh how good it feels to have power :D even tho i can only rev to 4000rpm its still damn fun. well for the 5mins i drove it.. oh and the mean grunty sound even tho it only has a stock turbo muffer on there.

then i found a coolant leak under the front of the inlet manifold. so thats off now. gota replace the gasket and the front stud as the thread is munted. but that should be done tomorow.

dyno is in 2weeks(18th march) and on the 19th im taking part in some 1/8th mile drags.

oh its starting to get exciting. mmm rb30 goodness :)

yeah i used to have a dirty old rb20e. the jump is massive. i might try get a drive in one of my mates gts25 just for comparasion. or let him take it for a spin to compare.

im keen to see how the dyno gos to see what the torque and kw are.

it will definatly be drivable round town easy. now i just need to get the inlet manifold on. check for leaks then i can start driving again :)

Hey I was thinking of doing this conversion on my R31 since DOHC is always better than SOHC, but I just want to know if all RB25's have VVT and whether you can run it without the VVT? Also do you need to run it from the RB25 ECU or can you still use the RB30 ECU?

Hey I was thinking of doing this conversion on my R31 since DOHC is always better than SOHC, but I just want to know if all RB25's have VVT and whether you can run it without the VVT? Also do you need to run it from the RB25 ECU or can you still use the RB30 ECU?

read the r33 rb30 thread.

r32 heads bolt stright on. that thread is in force induction.

you can make them run with out vvt. just change the inlet cam. but you still have to run external oil feed and drain.

ok heres some sad news :P

sounds like my rb30 has screwd the big end bearing after only 20km of driving. yeah its worse then a rotor...

the reason why is the engine lost all its oil out of the front of the engine. presumably around the crank oil seal. so it should be fixed under waranty. argh stupid engine builders!!

so ill probly wont be able to dyno the car or take it to the 1/8th mile drags as it probly wont be fixed in time :(

all i can say is the little bit of driving i did today was freaking awesome. i cant wait to have it back and running. it sounds so nice too :O

read the r33 rb30 thread.

If you mean the one stickied at the top, that thing has 166 pages! Can anyone just tell me if the RB25DE ecu is needed to run the RB30DE. I'm assuming so since it is DOHC and it has the cam profiles in it.

If you mean the one stickied at the top, that thing has 166 pages! Can anyone just tell me if the RB25DE ecu is needed to run the RB30DE. I'm assuming so since it is DOHC and it has the cam profiles in it.

if your going to not use the vvt you can use a rb25de ecu outa a r32. im using vvt and i was running a stock rb25de ecu from a r33. bear in mind you will need the right loom for the ecu.

download this pdf to find out everything you need to know

http://www.geocities.com/r32_jjc/

if your going to not use the vvt you can use a rb25de ecu outa a r32. im using vvt and i was running a stock rb25de ecu from a r33. bear in mind you will need the right loom for the ecu.

download this pdf to find out everything you need to know

http://www.geocities.com/r32_jjc/

Lol forgot about the loom. Now I'm not so sure if I want to do the DOHC conversion since there'll be a lot of wiring involved. Think I might just go down the RB30ET route.

Guess it depends on how much wiring there is to do and how hard it's going to be and also how long the car will be off the road.

Is there actually much work involved in having the VVT?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Finally replaced the previous temporary mesh indicator surrounds (temporary was the last 10+ years 😂) with a 3D printed GTR style version for the front indicators. I think it looks a lot nicer than the old setup and at least the indicators now point in the correct direction rather than angled off. Needed a little bit of tweaking to deal with the intercooler piping but got there in the end. Old and new photos below. 
    • It's weird to me that you say this because I'm pretty sure locals with relatively standard standalone tunes (boost/barometric compensated alpha-N) still have driveability issues when they pop intercooler hoses. Maybe with enough data I can just train some kind of model that spits out an expected grams/cyl given every sensor input except MAF like what FCA did with their Pentastar 3.6 ECU logic. Basically stock everything. The main motivation honestly is to have a sensor that can be a decent baseline source of truth. In scenarios you're describing obviously it won't work every time but it seems to me the number of corner cases that exist in MAF load is maybe not as severe and difficult to manage vs ITB alpha-N with some MAP/barometric compensation.
    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
    • Is MAF load really that bad? I'm not trying to do big power, my only real desire is VCAM and flex fuel support so I'm not terrified of blowing my engine apart from CA's appalling 95 RON "premium" fuel. Stuff like playing with closed loop boost control and really dialing in my transient fueling and ignition are frankly just to prove to myself I remembered something from uni.
×
×
  • Create New...