Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 months later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 2 months later...
wasnt ther a gunmetal R32 GTR that ran 55.** on the short one a month or so ago?

Yeah Mark & Russ' beast ran a 55.5 or thereabouts late last year from memory but came out & smashed that on Friday! Congrats btw guys well done!!

sounds like you weren't exactly hanging about yourself there cam... :(

how did the brakes go this time?

Yeah mate not bad! We've still got some minor issues to sort out & adjustments to make, particularly to the suspension. I know we have more improvement in the car, no question, so it will be interesting to see where we end up.

I'm very happy with the 55.8 considering where the car is it & what we haven't done to it yet..... In 6 to 12 months time she'll be pretty quick :)

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Guys,

The problem with the Saturday times is that they are timed by a guy pressing a button in the timing room feeding into the computer. As such their accuracy has been seen to be as bad as +/- 2 seconds.

The records in this thread are all timed electronically.

Paul

I have a 32 GTS-T, last saturday I did a PB of 63.6.

What proof do you require?

For you Si, just 3 depositions from witnesses unrelated to you :closedeyes:

Thanks for letting me know something was on zoomie. Even if the red barge isn't running well enough to track I could still come and watch.

Hi Guys,

The problem with the Saturday times is that they are timed by a guy pressing a button in the timing room feeding into the computer. As such their accuracy has been seen to be as bad as +/- 2 seconds.

The records in this thread are all timed electronically.

Paul

woohoo my PB could have been 56 then :rolleyes:

Only kidding :unsure:

I've used a drift box and aim laptimers in the past on Sat sprint. Their timing, in the past, was fairly accurate.

Wow it is my surprise that the timing was done manually. I 've always wonder how they time when there is no transponder in the car :LOL:

For you Si, just 3 depositions from witnesses unrelated to you :laugh:

Thanks for letting me know something was on zoomie. Even if the red barge isn't running well enough to track I could still come and watch.

Sorry Geoff,

Thought you were still up swanning around with the fish ;)

I'll let you know next time, hope to have to Sil80 back out soon

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The trigger kit I have is similar to the one in the link below. While going through Facebook, I saw someone else mention a similar issue, and I’m starting to think this could be related to the crank gear itself. I understand these parts are CNC machined, but maybe some earlier versions or individual pieces might have slight inconsistencies—it just doesn’t look right in my case. https://www.facebook.com/share/16an8evZd9/?mibextid=wwXIfr I originally installed the crank gear using the thin OEM washer, but as shown in the attached photo, the timing belt walks very close to the edge. When I tried using a Nitto washer—which is thicker—it actually made the issue worse. The belt walks about 1mm off the front edge, which raises more concern about alignment.   I’ve gone through the full process of elimination:   The tensioner pulley and bolt are brand new and installed correctly. The bolt isn’t bent and is oriented properly. The back of the tensioner and the idler pulley are clean and seated correctly. The idler sits slightly more forward, which I understand is due to its design. I’ve experimented with both tight and loose belt tension, but it makes no difference. As soon as the engine runs, the belt immediately walks forward again—even if I reset it beforehand.     At this point, I’m considering replacing the crank gear with your Race Version 1 (12-tooth), but before purchasing, I wanted to ask:   Are you aware of any alignment issues when using this gear? Would this gear help keep the belt aligned correctly, or could the walking still occur? Does it work with a standard missing-tooth crank and rear washer? Is there any specific crank setup or install procedure required?     For reference, I’m not using a front washer, as the PRP crank gear seems to replace the need for one.   Looking forward to your advice.
    • Yep, looks that way. Never driven an E30 or R31 so I can only imagine  
    • Yuh, My new R34 box is sitting on the workshop floor (in its large shipping box, which is a nice thing on its own), along with a front plate to convert to push clutch. There was no way I was interested in rebuilding my existing one. Was only partly interested in the risk of buying a used one. But, if you want a 2nd hander, I can point you to one in/near Melbourne at least. @Komdotkom has one that should be in good enough condition to be usable. I don't think it's in a for sale thread, you'd have to message him. @redzedhas one that definitely needs a rebuild.
    • I used to love going to Amaroo to watch the HQ series go for broke (eventually stopped due to lack of spare parts) and also the Porsche series.  It was so cool to back your car up to nearly the edge of the viewing barrier and party with your friends, having a bbq and alcoholic/non drinks. It was such a family/mates atmosphere
×
×
  • Create New...