Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

well seeing as though a rb25 half cut for a series 2 is around the $4500 without brakes, and a 1jz half cut with manual box is $4200 (working off quotes i have recieved) so i don't think it is as rediculous as what you think. i also got a quote from my mechanic that he would only charge me an extra $600 for installation for the 1jz compared to the rb25.

Edited by snuffle_uffugus

then the problems of the exhaust etc etc etc etc etc

Its harder than you think as the motors are reversed, the pan allows for the motor one way, not the other, lots of fabrication. Far more than $600

Then there is the whole engineering side of it, gearbox mouting etc etc etc

I wouldnt even consider the Toyota motors, simple reason the turbo / exhaust is on the wrong side for starters :)

Secondly, the wiring issues etc, gearbox etc all means too hard when there is a simpler alternative. I doubt an RB25 is as stron...but im of the beleif provided you arent running more then 1.2-1.3bar of boost then a well tuned/modified RB25 will happily live at 280-310rwkws....and odds are if you can afford the gear to get to that power level you can afford the price of a set of pistons and balanced GTR rods?!?!?!?

well the thing is my friend has already done the conversion and he left the stock dumps as they are expensive to change, but he went through the same mechanic as im going to go through and he said he only charged my mate an extra $600 to do the conversion compared to an rb25 conversion.

he used the standard ca18 engine mounts made custom gearbox mounts and custom tail shaft and besides that it was just a bolt in affair, the extra exaust yes to change to the other side but he saved plumbing in plumbing cost as he didn't have to do the run around in the engine bay.

as to do with the wiring bit more dramas hooking up the speedo and tacho but everything else cost the same with the auto electrician.

you can check out the conversion via this link.

http://www.nissansilvia.com/forums/index.p...howtopic=132278

just after some opionons as which way you would go, taking into account the half cut is an extra $300. the whole conversion will cost an extra $300 to do the whole thing.

cheers

Can I ask why your not wanting to use the SR20? What's the intended use for the car?

Stroker kits (HKS, Tomei etc) are falling in price all the time and can transform the SR into a seriously torquey motor.

The weight distribution will be more suited towards road/track work and the rebuild costs will obviously be less with a 4 cyl.

i feel that a four cylinder is going to be too laggy and not as streetable as a 6 cylinder would be. i just recently sold the ca as a package with motor gearbox loom so on and so forth.

so by the time i bought an sr20 and built it seems rather pointless if you ask me considering the cost of building a stroked sr20.

also what happens god forbid soemthign happens with and oil pump or the car leans out (or in my case some how my sump plug falls which actually happened to me but in my case i found out beffore i ran out of oil)o and i pop the motor i will have to pay for a new rebuild where as you can buy a 1jz half cut for 2200 (automatic) that includes everything so i think that the sr20, altough a good motor isn't the way i want to go i am looking at making a 300rwkw daily driver. i think a 4 cylidner at that kinda power would be a bit of a pig on the road with lag and so on. this is just my opionon and im wanting to discuss it so i make the right decsion thanks for the advice.

cheers

Edited by snuffle_uffugus

mate, i say stick with the SR20, lot easier in terms of insurance/ engineering/ rego not to mention you are upsetting the balance of te car (yes, i know there are many cars with the 6cyl conversion, but Nissan designed them with the 4)

for the price of the conversion you are considering, you can get a HKS turbo, ECU, Pump, injectors, I/C... the list is endless and it will eat the stock 1JZ or RB25.....

added -

just noticed you had the CA and offloaded it.... I still vote the SR20.

If you go ahead with the 6cyl, consider the upgrades avail and their costs.

Edited by DAN00H
i feel that a four cylinder is going to be too laggy and not as streetable as a 6 cylinder would be. i just recently sold the ca as a package with motor gearbox loom so on and so forth.

so by the time i bought an sr20 and built it seems rather pointless if you ask me considering the cost of building a stroked sr20.

also what happens god forbid soemthign happens with and oil pump or the car leans out (or in my case some how my sump plug falls which actually happened to me but in my case i found out beffore i ran out of oil)o and i pop the motor i will have to pay for a new rebuild where as you can buy a 1jz half cut for 2200 (automatic) that includes everything so i think that the sr20, altough a good motor isn't the way i want to go i am looking at making a 300rwkw daily driver. i think a 4 cylidner at that kinda power would be a bit of a pig on the road with lag and so on. this is just my opionon and im wanting to discuss it so i make the right decsion thanks for the advice.

cheers

Before deciding, try to arrange a drive in a stroked SR with a well matched terb (and of course a well tuned ECU). I have driven an S15 with an HKS 2.2L kit and was amazed at the off boost torque.

Edited by Gav

well to buy a sr20det half cut you are looking at $3500 then you look at the price of building it... atleast $8,000 decent rebuilding including head gasket stroker kit bearings and machining and so on (including labour), and that doesn't include labour on fitting the motor give it will only be like $500 or so labour and then allow for parts and materials. you are still stuck with a bog stock motor that is just rebuilt.... and i still get back to the fact that rebuilt motors can blow, whether just from too much power and thrashing it to much, or whether it is from bad luck with something going wrong like leaning out in one of the cylinders and poping the motor (i know it is highly unlikly but it can happen) then i gotta pull the motor out and rebuild it yet again then there goes thousands of more dollars...

can you guys see where im comming from, where as with the rb25 and 1jz they are pretty strong internally stnadard and if they blow after a year or 2 i can just replace with another stock motor which would set me back $1,000 for the motor istead of another rebuild. also if you setup your suspension correctly you can get the car handling pretty close to the way it handles with the four cylinder.

can you see my side of it or do you still think sr20 is the go?

1jz is deffinatly able to make more power with the stock internals over the Rb25, that goes without saying, however the Rb25 would be a much simpler install then the 1jz and the $600 you would save coulld then be spent elswhere to improve the 25 and make it a much better package over all.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
×
×
  • Create New...