Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Nice steering wheel on the Series 1, lol

Hrm, compared to this particular series1 steering wheel?

skyline9.jpg

:O

Unless you were on the track, taking out an airbag steering wheel leans a bit on the stupid side.

029np.jpg

Hardly any different to an S2 steering wheel...

1151517img5av.jpg

But I suppose some people like wank factors and spend ~$300 for a wheel that's nowhere near as beneficial, but at least has "MOMO" in the middle of it :blink:

Don't fix what's not broken, y'know?

The R32s have the sleek look as well as the 'GODZILLA' look. They are lighter than the 33s

The R33s are newer cars but people tend to think they look too bulky and they are becoming a very common sight on australian roads. However, interior wise, the 33s looks much better, more spacious compared to the 32 and S14

S14s are nice cars after you dump some nice 19" rims and lower the car. It's a really fun car to drive. On the other hand, you won't get much room for any passengers at the back and if you're a tall person, this isnt the car to get.

My 2 cents

the on,y reason the R32 is lighter is the motor if you compair a RB25 32 againt a Rb25 33 the weight is the same.

here the specs for a R32GTS25 and a R33GTS25

R32EXTERIOR

Exterior dimensions (LxWxH), mm 4530 x 1695 x 1325

Interior dimensions (LxWxH), mm 1805 x 1400 x 1090

Wheel base, mm 2615

Treads (F/R), mm 1460 / 1460

Ground clearance, mm 145

Curb vehicle weight, kg 1360

Gross vehicle weight, kg

Seating capacity, persons 5

Doors number 2

Min.turning radius, m 5.2

Fuel tank capacity, l 60

R33EXTERIOR

Exterior dimensions (LxWxH), mm 4640 x 1720 x 1340

Interior dimensions (LxWxH), mm 1820 x 1415 x 1090

Wheel base, mm 2720

Treads (F/R), mm 1480 / 1470

Ground clearance, mm 145

Curb vehicle weight, kg 1350

Gross vehicle weight, kg

Seating capacity, persons 5

Doors number 2

Min.turning radius, m 5.2

Fuel tank capacity, l 65

Go The Big Whale

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So where is this message group so we can organise another meet? Keen to come along and catchup. Might eventually be in a skyline again next year, but the Mustang will have to do for now. Also need to get the WRX back on the road. Stupid f**king money pit that thing is.
    • Stock equivalent turbo replacement is a bit of a nightmare. The old Hitachi ceramic things were pretty good for their time, but they have primitive, vintage aerodynamics. The only thing they have going for them is a light turbine**, and there are plenty of other light turbine options these days, in both materials and CNC manufacturing methods. So, the old stocker makes absolutely no power at all compared to its physical size and its (not very low) boost threshold and response. ** and the ONLY thing that was good about the ceramic turbine was that it was light. In all other respects it is a nightmare. To get a turbo that is anywhere near equivalent in terms of power capacity (ie, to avoid it being "bigger" and needing tuning/fuelling/etc) you have to physically downsize. And that is not a "stockish" replacement. Doesn't just fit where the old one did. At least a frame size down, probably need a new dump, probably need new inlet and outlet piping made on the compressor side, new hose connections as D said above. I say, if you have to suffer that much work, you might as well do the same work to fit an even bigger (than stock) turbo, have more power (and hence have to do injectors, ECU, etc), and love life, instead of suffering with stock power levels. Or, you get a light highflow from someone like Hypergear. A highflow that has not been pushed too far from stock. There are still modification consequences here though. HG's cores are smaller than the massive Hitachi core, so it is shorter, moves the compressor housing backwards and requires mods to the air side piping. Plus new hoses. Looks stock, mostly fits where the stock one did (with the previous caveats mentioned), makes a bit more power but can be run at stock boost levels and not cause too many ECU problems. But, seriously. It's 2024. Like - 25 years since the R33 came out. It's time to put an ECU in it. I Nistuned my car (on RB20 ECU then later again on the Neo ECU) and it was the single best thing possible for minimal money. Dial out the R&R bullshit, fix up the fuelling and timing to make it more efficient for normal driving (cut fuel consumption by >10%). Nistune is not an option for you unless you change the ECU, so you might as well just do a standalone. it will be worth it. And then you can tune it up to the limits of the injectors and AFM, which is pushing 200rwkW and enjoy some actual squirt, instead of the lazy barge-like motion you get from a stock engine, turbo and management.
    • He can't post pics until he's at 10 post count.
    • Welcome James.....will be interesting to see how much fun there is in the project. .....where's the pics?
×
×
  • Create New...