Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The 2835R turbos are probably the limiting factor on the R33 at the moment.They were chosen because on a 3 litre engine with 9.1:1 comp they give strong top end power & also come on boost relatively quickly - making the car very responsive for street use.

Now the car has morphed into a race car(is awesome on the street - but who am I kidding - it's no daily driver) the smallish turbos limit the current setup to around 850-900 hp.

I would like to fit 3037S & remap the motec to suit which should see the output raised to 1000hp without ringing it's neck - but

no-one has put their hand up for the 2835Rs & without selling them I can not upgrade.Larger turbos would increase lag, but on a car that rarely sees less than 7000rpm that would not be an issue.I would like to see the car run a 9.4 as it is - but drag racing is a funny thing. 9.6 might be where it's at, & thats fine.

Slicks would definately be faster.Possibly by 4or 5 tenths, but create other problems.For a start, there are 2 classes for GTRs -

"street drag GTR" running radial tyres (Nittos) or "Pro GTR" running slicks.It is much more than a simple tyre swap.To run slicks you must run 15" rims, which means removing all the GTR

brakes & running smaller non turbo style discs & calipers.Also the suspension has to be totally changed to suit the softer tyres.

another problem is that in Australia(under ANDRA rules) a 4WD is

not allowed to run non radial tyres all round - so unless it's an outlaw meeting at a non-sanctioned event - it wont comply.

The HKS car was exempt at Drag Combat last year as an exhibition car - but they nearly did not let it run as it did not comply with heaps of ANDRA regulations.The shock load through the drivetrain from a 4WD slicks launch can also cause severe breakages.It also means 4 slicks,4 rims, brake changes etc - add that up.Rather than do a bit at a time & slowly get the car into the 9s, I decided to go all out & stretch as far as I could.With the std engine my best was 11.10. Now with new engine my best is 9.66. That's a huge leap in drag racing.With fine tuning & 60' practice we may shave a tenth or two, but the next step into the low 9s could cost anywhere from $20-30,000.00

It's also about the look of the car. As it is it looks like a fairly normal GTR at first glance(I was driving down GJ rd recently & a copper coming the other way didn't even turn to look at it!)

With 15" rims, lexan windows all round,no headlights, & covered with stickers I think it spoils the look of a GTR.People can relate to it if if still looks like a street car.Hope the weather is good for Sat night - looking forward to 9500rpm & playing with my Holinger.

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
    • 95 is just a scam outright. 98 is the real "premium" with all the best detergents and other additive packages, and at least historically, used to be more dense also. 95 is just 91 bargain basement shit with a little extra octane rating. Of course, there's 91 and there's 91 also. I always (back in the 90s early 2000s) refused to put fuel in from supermarket related fuel chains on the basis that it was nasty half arsed shit imported from Indonesia. Nowadays, I suspect that there is little difference between the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the "bargain" chains and the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the big brands, given that most of it is coming from the same SEAsian refineries. Anyway - if there's still anything to that logic, then it would apply to 95 also. 98 is only made in decent refineries and, as I said, is usually the "premium" fuel, both in terms of octane rating and "use this because it's good for your engine because it's got the unicorn jizz in it!".
    • Yeah since those first 2 replies I actually went and put some 98 in it and tbf it's already doing much better than the 95 (which is weird and makes my inner tinfoil hat wearer think the 95 was a crap batch), getting 8ish around town. Again, wonder if it takes a while to stabilize if the fuel is changed a couple of times. I swear cars used to just either run "well" or "s**t* in my 20s, none of this fuel optimisation business haha 
×
×
  • Create New...