Jump to content
SAU Community

R32 or R33?  

97 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

why cant we all settle this over some sympathy tea?! skyliner at war aganst a fellow skyliner, THIS IS MADNESS!!!

Besides everyone knows r32 GTR is the fastest :P

i've got a BMI dvd which holds a race at a circuit in japan between the R32 GTR, R33 GTR, R34 GTR, V35 Skyline, WRX STi and an EVO 8/9 (all were stock). the finishing order was....

1. R34 GTR

2. WRX STi

3. EVO 8/9

4. R33 GTR

5. V35 Skyline

6. R32 GTR (was last by about 7 secs over 5 laps!!!)

it was done by the Drift King and all his JGTC mates...... feel free to borrow it if you like, just be sure to return it!!! (looking at Veilside.....)

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

And am I right in saying that the GTR motor basically didn't change???

It was the bolt on's and chassis/suspension that made the difference.

[including ABS/Traction control/turbo in the bolt on dept.]

Not sure about cams - LTS would be able to add value here.

How come up until last year the R32 GTR held the Nurburing record???

Up till the enzo it was the fastest production car around there I thought?

I could easily, very easily live with a Z tune.

So when are you planning to blow the motor on your R33 GT-R Beau?

When you schedule it can you please let me know when it's going to happen so I can be there with a camera to capture that magical moment of pride that I'm sure is going to be all over your face?

i havent even planned on getting a 33, let alone a GTR 33, but yes if i ever have the money to waste on buying a 33 GTR i will let you know when ill blow it up and you can record it, just for your personal enjoyment mark...

My understanding is that all stock GTR's produce 206kw from the factory.

There is obviously improvements to body/chasis/suspension etc... in the example above.

It'd be interesting to know the year of manufacture for each model.

Could we compare the 4wd table at the back of the HPI type mags bought locally ? Wonder who would hold the qtr times there.....

How come up until last year the R32 GTR held the Nurburing record???

which catagory are you thinking of??? classics or pre-historic??? :D

seriously though, which one? i wasnt aware of any GTR holding a record around there for that long.......

Could we compare the 4wd table at the back of the HPI type mags bought locally ? Wonder who would hold the qtr times there.....

so let me get this straight you are going to say that the 32's hold most of the better times lets see why that may be

r32 gtr = 18 - 28K

r33 gtr = 35 - 43K

r34 gtr = 65K +

So all that money you save on buying a newer nicer looking car you can dump into mods for the car thus making it quick... This then doesnt prove anything other than r32 gtr's are cheap thats why people buy and mod them :D

And am I right in saying that the GTR motor basically didn't change???

It was the bolt on's and chassis/suspension that made the difference.

[including ABS/Traction control/turbo in the bolt on dept.]

Not sure about cams - LTS would be able to add value here.

Well,despite being "quoted" as the same 206Kw,the 32,33 and 34 all have different torque figures...So the 206 Kw figure was merely there only as the Japanese "gentleman's agreement" between manufacturers. A quick summary of standard GT-R trim models:

32 GT-R:206Kw/353Nm

33 GT-R:206Kw/629Nm

34 GT-R:206Kw/392Nm

So,one could assume the Kw figures aren't really relevant(torque wont go up without some sort of jump in Kw's...)

GTR's blowing their engines is just an initiation to becoming a REAL GTR OWNER! if uve still got ur GTR after its blown up then your worthy of having it.

So,B;am I not worthy? :D

How come up until last year the R32 GTR held the Nurburing record???

Up till the enzo it was the fastest production car around there I thought?

Not quite;there's been the odd Porsche special in there,BUT the GT-R(32,natch') did hold the record for a proportionately long time...

Oh,one for those who like figures...GT-R models refered to

32:weight 1480Kg,7.18Kg/Kw

33:1530Kg,7.43Kg/Kw

34 1540Kg,7.48Kw/Kg

0-100: 32 4.73 sec's

33 4.94

34 4.92

400m: 32 13.02 sec's

33 13.19

34 13.13

So,in conclusion...ah,no point rubbing it in! :D

Andrew your an idiot :D its HATCHI rocku not Hatsu... Cant you speak Japanese?

Anyway.... I have decided to vote for R32 because I personally prefer them over the 33 and that is enough of a reason for me. I personally have driven most kinds of Skylines (R31aus4door, R31 GTSx, R32 GTR, GTST, R33 GTR, GTST, GTS4) and I would be happy with any of them because they are all skylines... All this arguing is pathetic and pointless because it all depends on your personal tastes THATS ALL!

But if money was not an issue I would have a Ferrari F40 4.2 twin turbo limited over any Skyline Hehehehe;)

Just my 2 cents :P

Edited by R31DET

I'm sure he was meaning 'Hatsu" as in Di"HATSU"...LOL!! A nice Japlish word that befits the Mighty Lemon!

Me;I'd agree-any Skyline is good! At the top of my list? Well,I own it! If money were no issue,I'd have the mac-daddy of them all:Maclarens' F1. Alongside it? A Z Tune AND my l'il R32! Seriously;I'll never sway from the Worlds best allrounder!

Edited by LTSJayce

lol, I was wondering how long it'd be before someone commented on Jayce's obvious lust for a R33 motor....

Anyhow, I was watching that motor show on SBS (Monday, 7:30 - tonight - check it out if you havn't already). They were commenting that the R32 held the *standard* production car record until last year when the new Ferrari F 60 (the Enzo) knocked it off. I know a few RUF's and stuff have been faster in between - but they weren't counted as a "standard" production car as they were enchanced. Same as a Nismo R32 wouldn't have counted.

I could be wrong though. I get that from time to time.

lol, I was wondering how long it'd be before someone commented on Jayce's obvious lust for a R33 motor....

Anyhow, I was watching that motor show on SBS (Monday, 7:30 - tonight - check it out if you havn't already). They were commenting that the R32 held the *standard* production car record until last year when the new Ferrari F 60 (the Enzo) knocked it off. I know a few RUF's and stuff have been faster in between - but they weren't counted as a "standard" production car as they were enchanced. Same as a Nismo R32 wouldn't have counted.

I could be wrong though. I get that from time to time.

if you read it properly it says r33gtst/r32 gtr putting them at the same level :) only reason i say that is i have not driven a gtr and i really do prefer a 33 body to a 32

33 gtst before any gtr?  You must be kidding.  I have had 32 and 33 gtst's and neither comes close to any gtr.

When you do get the chance to drive a GTR (properly) Leigh, you will realise why they are so much more appreciated than the GTST, I have driven a very serious R32 GTR before and since then I have lusted after one ever since (particularly an R32 GTR Vspec2... Hmmmm I wonder who has one of those?) but I simply cannot afford one, let alone the insurance price tag, but ONE DAY! I will have one!

Jayce..... If you happen to die of "natural" causes can I have your car pretty please? You know Ill take good care of it! :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • This has clearly gone off on quite a tangent but the suggestion was "go standalone because you probably aren't going to stop at just exhaust + a mild tune and manual boost controller", not "buy a standalone purely for a boost controller". If the scope does in fact stop creeping at an EBC then sure, buy an EVC7 or Profec or whatever else people like to run and stop there. And I have yet to see any kind of aftermarket boost control that is more complicated than a PID controller with some accounting for edge cases. Control system theory is an incredibly vast field yet somehow we always end up back at some variant of a PID controller, maybe with some work done to linearize things. I have done quite a lot, but I don't care to indulge in those pissing matches, hence posting primary sources. I deal with people quite frequently that scream and shout about how their opinion matters more because they've shipped more x or y, it doesn't change the reality of the data they're trying to disagree with. Arguing that the source material is wrong is an entirely separate point and while my experience obviously doesn't matter here I've rarely seen factory service manuals be incorrect about something. It's not some random poorly documented internal software tool that is constantly being patched to barely work. It's also not that hard to just read the Japanese and double check translations either. Especially in automotive parts most of it is loanwords anyways.
    • If you are keeping the current calipers you need to keep the current disc as the spacing of the caliper determines the disc diameter. Have you trial fitted the GTS brakes fit on a GTSt hub or is this forward planning? There could be differences in caliper mount spacing, backing plate and even hub shape that could cause an issue.
    • Hi there I have a r33 gts with 4 stud small brakes, I'm going to convert to 5 stud but keep the small brakes, what size rotor would I need?
    • First up, I wouldn't use PID straight up for boost control. There's also other control techniques that can be implemented. And as I said, and you keep missing the point. It's not the ONE thing, it's the wrapping it up together with everything else in the one system that starts to unravel the problem. It's why there are people who can work in a certain field as a generalist, IE a IT person, and then there are specialists. IE, an SQL database specialist. Sure the IT person can build and run a database, and it'll work, however theyll likely never be as good as a specialist.   So, as said, it's not as simple as you're thinking. And yes, there's a limit to the number of everything's in MCUs, and they run out far to freaking fast when you're designing a complex system, which means you have to make compromises. Add to that, you'll have a limited team working on it, so fixing / tweaking some features means some features are a higher priority than others. Add to that, someone might fix a problem around a certain unrelated feature, and that change due to other complexities in the system design, can now cause a new, unforseen bug in something else.   The whole thing is, as said, sometimes split systems can work as good, and if not better. Plus when there's no need to spend $4k on an all in one solution, to meet the needs of a $200 system, maybe don't just spout off things others have said / you've read. There's a lot of misinformation on the internet, including in translated service manuals, and data sheets. Going and doing, so that you know, is better than stating something you read. Stating something that has been read, is about as useful as an engineering graduate, as all they know is what they've read. And trust me, nearly every engineering graduate is useless in the real world. And add to that, if you don't know this stuff, and just have an opinion, maybe accept what people with experience are telling you as information, and don't keep reciting the exact same thing over and over in response.
    • How complicated is PID boost control? To me it really doesn't seem that difficult. I'm not disputing the core assertion (specialization can be better than general purpose solutions), I'm just saying we're 30+ years removed from the days when transistor budgets were in the thousands and we had to hem and haw about whether there's enough ECC DRAM or enough clock cycles or the interrupt handler can respond fast enough to handle another task. I really struggle to see how a Greddy Profec or an HKS EVC7 or whatever else is somehow a far superior solution to what you get in a Haltech Nexus/Elite ECU. I don't see OEMs spending time on dedicated boost control modules in any car I've ever touched. Is there value to separating out a motor controller or engine controller vs an infotainment module? Of course, those are two completely different tasks with highly divergent requirements. The reason why I cite data sheets, service manuals, etc is because as you have clearly suggested I don't know what I'm doing, can't learn how to do anything correctly, and have never actually done anything myself. So when I do offer advice to people I like to use sources that are not just based off of taking my word for it and can be independently verified by others so it's not just my misinterpretation of a primary source.
×
×
  • Create New...