Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I accidentally ripped the wires out of my S-AFC last night (long story). Anyway I had to run the car without the AFM sensor wire for around an hour. It sputtered and choked all this while but I didn't really have much of a choice except call for a tow (at 3am).

Anyway I'm wondering if this has done anything harmful to my engine. I'm guess I only have to worry about it leaning out the mixture too much, but it didn't seem to ping at all. I just couldn't go over 2500rpm or so :D

Fortunately the wiring loom just plugged back in again when I took the unit apart today and it was all good. Oh yeah, one more question - I want to reset the ECU after last night's episode, but I don't know if I should disable the S-AFC after doing so while the ECU "learns" its new map again.

If I don't, won't the S-AFC settings interfere and it will think that they're all zero when they're not? (hope that makes sense). Ok, example - If I reset the ECU as-is, will it then run as if I'd set everything on the S-AFC to zero, and then revert to the complete OPPOSITE of what it's set to now if I disconnect the S-AFC and re-attach the AFM wire? Argh, that looks so confusing. I hope someone knows what I'm on about here :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10149-ran-car-without-s-afc/
Share on other sites

I've done the same before, but only drove it for a few hundred metres before I pulled over and pulled it apart and stuck everything back together properly. Kinda weird bouncing of 2500rpm... Doesn't seem to have done any damage, but the engine wouldn't have a clue how much air was going in so it just guesses - in other words, not a good idea to drive for any distance.

Tape the wire where it goes into the board on with some heavy tape...that will stop it happening again.

Ok, storytime :D

I had duct-taped the S-AFC under my dash because the double-sided tape that comes with it is shithouse. This only lasted a few weeks though before coming off, and I never got around to putting it back on. So I just took up some of the slack from behind the dash and threw the whole unit across the centre console and had it rest sort of where the passenger seat meets the console.

This was ok for a few days, but then one time last night I slid the seat forwards to let the rear seat passengers out and it pulled the S-AFC forwards with it because it was trapped between seat and console, resulting in no more wire connection :(

If I had the right sized screwdriver with me I could have fixed it before we left. So now some tools are going into my car permanently, including the right sized screwdriver for that thing :)

Also your oxygen sensor acts below a certain RPM to recalculate A/Fs as well as your afm.

Not good running your car for ANY amount of time with the afm disconnected..Your car would be going lean rich lean rich, probably why it wouldnt go past 2500 is because your mixtures were that far out it couldnt run your car!

You can reset your ecu with safc still connected it shouldnt make any difference at all

Hmm, I'm more inclined to believe Doctor's theory over macka's. If there is no signal coming from the sensor, it would have no idea of whether to run lean or rich. I don't think it would just swap arbitrarily between the 2 mappings, I'm sure it would try to do one instead of the other. Since Nissan err on the side of caution with the default rich mappings, I'm inclined to believe that it would just run constantly rich with no AFM signal.

What I did was the equivalent of the AFM dying, and I think the ECU would be designed with a possible AFM failure in mind in the general scheme of things. Anyway that's just my theory, I've got no intentions of testing it again!

JimX, you wouldn't have to worry about any damage to the engine. You've just experience your car in "limp-home" mode. The ECU detected a fault in the AFM. Limp-home mode doesn't allow you to rev past a certain rev range (it's about 3000rpm on mine - not a 'line tho). It retards timing way back and dumps in a shit load of petrol.

Originally posted by JimX

Anyway I'm wondering if this has done anything harmful to my engine. I'm guess I only have to worry about it leaning out the mixture too much, but it didn't seem to ping at all. I just couldn't go over 2500rpm or so :D

the 02 sensor is a back up for the afm signal, to allow higher end adjustments after teh afm signal (you can see this on a dyno afr ratio graph where up the top end it will fluctuate, since this is the 02 sensor altering the fuelling) - not sure if the 02 sensor can adjust when the afm isn't connected, but seems fairly reasonable to suggest it still would

Are you saying the O2 sensor adjusts fueling?

All it does is "sense". The ECU adjusts the fueling accordingly via the injectors.

Originally posted by PSIKO

the 02 sensor is a back up for the afm signal, to allow higher end adjustments after teh afm signal (you can see this on a dyno afr ratio graph where up the top end it will fluctuate, since this is the 02 sensor altering the fuelling) - not sure if the 02 sensor can adjust when the afm isn't connected, but seems fairly reasonable to suggest it still would

yeah it senses, and provides secondary fuel adjustments (mainly in higher rev range) ... however isn't the primary measurement device (the afm is) since it is located in the dump, and when the mixtures have reach it, it alters accordingly, therefore leaning and enriching as macka said

the o2 sensor sends signals back to the computer either rich or lean via voltage reading. if the o2 sensor reads rich, the computer compensates by leaning off mixture. if o2 sensor reads lean, computer richens mixture. an o2 sensor is a TRIMMING device, nothing more.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • What can't be done with a little bit of decking board or similar timber bolted to a hub flange via 2 wheel nuts is not worth talking about.
    • I noticed something. On the tps sensor and the sensor behind the adjustment screw is adjusted towards the far left. Are these screws supposed to be centered? (this sensor was in the same position before the tune as well)  Also attached a photo of where my car usually idles at when warm (sometimes a tiny bit above that). I think I might have screwed up the calculation and it might have better than I thought lol at 750rpm still not 650rpm though.      
    • So for both general interest of engine health, and to rule out any coolant/oil issues, I organised an oil analysis done on the 125,000klm oil Results below, all good, just a bit of fuel dilution which I'm not too worried about
    • This is actually a really good way of measuring what wheels fit. If only there was a similar measurement between hub face and suspension :p That said, it's probably pretty simple to actually measure it all with the wheel off the car for the rear. The front is a bit more complex but.. 
    • Being the top Google search result for R34 wheel-related inquiries, lemme throw down my experience. I calculated that 100mm from hub face to wheel face is about the perfect fitment for my ENR34 sedan.  I've been running 18x8.5s, ET35, with a 1" spacer. So, 8.5in to mm = 216mm. 216/2 = 108mm. 108-35 = 73mm. 73+ 25 (1" to mm) = 98mm.  If you wanna get close to this on dif widths, here are the offsets you'll want: 9" - ET around 15mm 9.5" - ET around 20mm 10" - you're crazy, but ET around 30mm All these should fit perfectly on a non-widebody, non-GTR Skyline. Note that it's probably the absolute max, and you're probably better off running a couple degrees of camber in this config, but it looks great, super flush.
×
×
  • Create New...