Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, i just spat my turbo on the 33 and in a mad panic picked up a rebuilt one, the original had 45V3 on the compressor housing and the new one had 45V1, and had the compressor fins in pairs. Does anyone know if there are any other differences between the 2, coz the new one goes heaps harder

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/101803-difference-between-v1-and-v3-turbos/
Share on other sites

Why did they change to the lighter nylon type wheel on the S2 and R34 turbo's then?

Not having a dig at all, just curious?

Two factors have a major impact on the rate of acceleration of an impeller:

radius

mass

Increase either of them, and the ability to build boost quickly is diminished.

Note that Blade numbers, shape, inducer size also impact on compressor performance.

cheers

Dale

  • 2 years later...

thats the same as mine..

ive got a '96 r33 series2..

i can took a photo of my compressor side..

i got a silver steel wheel..

single blades/fins wheel..

and it says 45V3 :)

so wat the deal?

can someone please explain??

i read that 45V1 & 45V2 is on series 1 R33

and that 45V3 & 45V4 are on series 2 R33

am i rit so far????????????????

then i was lead to believe that...

series 1 have a alloy single blade/fin wheel (is it alloy?or was it steel?????????????) :D

&

series 2 have a nylon twin blade/fin wheel

is this correct?? :D

As far as im aware the "v1" "v2" "v3" means absolutely nothing except the casting number. It has no difference between the numbers. My series 2 had a 45v1 on it and i can guarantee it came like that from factory. I now have a highflowed rb25 turbo and it came with 45v3 on the housing. Means nothing.

Are you sure you're not mistaking it for the black nylon series 2 wheel as it does sorta look like a metal wheel... Unless your turbo has been highflowed otherwise there would be no reason to change that wheel. It's the turbine side that spits anyway there would be no reason for the front to let go before the back.

And the series 2's still have a single blade from memory...

For all intents and purposes R33 S1 and R33 S2 turbos are virtually the same.

While the turbo makeup is actually different there is minimally noticeable difference in performance between them

R34 has a slightly larger rear on it (better for hi-flowing) and does make on average 10rwkw more @ 12psi than R33 items due to this

ah yeah i don't know anything about gtr turbo's but i would daresay they dont have the 45v"x" and would have something completely different as they're smaller turbo's and there's two of them. Sounds to me like he's talking about a gtst. Please advise.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They need to get a grip. R32 GTRs got as low as AU$8-10K at one point here.
    • You have just offended every teenage boy in America
    • Structured text and other high level PLC programing languages are not allowable in Functional Safety. They are very difficult to audit. My PLC stuff is almost exclusively oriented towards Burner Management Systems which are a particularly pernicious form of Safety Instrumented System, when implemented in an SPLC. Even the part of the code written to work in the non-safety logic part of the PLC, like with a Siemens S7-1500 series, still needs to be treated as if it was safety code, with access restrictions, code fingreprints and the like. And Allen Bradley can go EABODs. They ae full of shit. They have this whole lie going on where they say if you use a ControlLogix controller and its IO, and then just duplicate the IOs (ie, run in series or parallel depending on type, to try to make it "fail safe") and "use these programming styles and place these restrictions on what you do" that you can achieve SIL2. What a load of crap. They just get away with it because no-one in the US seems to understand the first thing about Functional Safety and carries on as if all they have to do is buy only SIL2 rated equipment and hey presto, it's a SIL2 system. Idiots. /rant
    • If you're really considering leaving it, a great question to ask is, is the magnet going to stick to the sump? The answer to the above is the same answer towards if I'd have any level of comfort leaving it... Personally, based on the cost of a motor if the magnet were to cause damage, I'd be fishing it out either way. Use the methods in here. It fit in through the plug hole, it'll come out.   PS, get a small actuatable claw for a bore scope. OR if you know a vet, they have really cool controllable scopes with hooks on the end. Supposedly they're like playing a video game. Ask if they can acquire you one of their scopes... Engine oil after all is just a different type of lube right? Will only make it easier on the next dog or cat...
    • All other (Boolean) logic functions though, are just built on those blocks above. Which does give you a lot of functionality in logic. It is basing that on using thresholds with analogue signals like GTS alluded to.   Not having things like timers will make it less useful for some of the ramp up logic you'd want, and again, on Haltecs capacity specifically, I'm not across anymore what you can / can't do with different tables.   I'm assuming, with your logic you want to implement, not only do you want your timing safeties, you're wanting to be able to derive the duty cycle for your solenoid, to maintain I'm assuming 175PSi? Or are you using a standalone WMI controller to maintain the DC correct, and you just want the Haltech working out which fuelling maps you should be on?
×
×
  • Create New...