Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 143
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

#Porsche supercar:I cant remember what it is called exactly but the brakes are fkn massive.See pic.(track day car/sunday driver)

#Bugatti veyron.(casino car)

#ferarri enzo.(track day car)

#Nismo z-tune r34 gtr (daily driver).

#maybach whatever so i can be chauffeur driven in luxury

All street driven cars.Lol.I dont like my chances at getting any of these insured at my age or the ammount it would total :(.Doesnt include my full house race cars.

:(

post-8610-1138010626.jpg

1. 1960's Aston Martin DB5

The name's Bond.  James Bond.  The ultimate gentleman spy's sportscar.  Option up the missles, oil slick and ejector seat and you too can be working for Mi6.

Why have a DB5 when you could get the DB5?

http://www.drive.com.au/editorial/article....vf=2&bg=24&pp=1

Hmm...

Porsche Carrera GT (pose mobile)

Gambella GT750 (good idea from above) (a people carrier)

Westfield w/SR20 (supercharge it, play with it, race it)

Porsche 993 911 turbo (daily driver)

Jaguar XKSS (hard to decide on the classic)

that's 3 for Porsche, 1 for NZ and I NEVER thought I'd consider a jag until festival of speed.

  • 3 weeks later...

1. 2006 Ferrari F1 car (for track...)

2. RS-R Supra (for drift...)

3. Ferrari F355 Spyder (for weekend cruising...)

4. R33 GTR 400R (who wouldn't!!!)

5. Evo IX (daily driver...)

post-17810-1139778252.jpg

post-17810-1139778433.jpg

post-17810-1139778536.jpg

post-17810-1139778561.jpg

post-17810-1139778804.jpg

Edited by Frink

Porsche GT3 RS

BMW M5 (Daily Driver)

Audi RS4

Mine's R34 GTR or R34 GTR Z-Tune (undecided!)

Mercedes Benz SLR McLaren

Nice!!!

Edited by Savage Bliss
BMW M5 (Daily Driver)

Audi RS4

Just curious as to why you'd have both an M5 and RS4, and use the bigger of the two cars as the daily driver.

I'd probably amalgamate both of those and get an RS6 Avant :P

Just curious as to why you'd have both an M5 and RS4, and use the bigger of the two cars as the daily driver.

I'd probably amalgamate both of those and get an RS6 Avant :(

Tough decision between the two I know, I was going to go for the RS6, but prefer the M5 for a number of reasons (too many to mention) oh and I should've specified that the RS4 was in the wagon version... which would be used more so for weekend driving, throw the stupid kids in the back, stupid dog... go thrash it!! And have a picnic... :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...