Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

One thing I should have mentioned last time is that the ATP housing is .63 a/r as in GT30 turbine .63 a/r

Cheers  A .

Hang on, are you saying that if I buy a GT28rs from ATP with the 0.63 AR ex housing, that it will be a 0.63 AR housing calculated on the size of the GT30 60mm turbine and not the 53mm turbine from the GT28rs? :):O:O

If so, unless I got it wrong, that still works out to smaller AR than the garrett 0.86.....

If I were to go for the flattest, largest in magnitude and earliest torque curve (yes the combination of the three ;)), I will benefit from using this 0.63 housing as you say...(pending explanation) but could I benefit from blocking of the gate and runnung my Tial 46mm gate to ensure the least back pressure in the housing too?

Last of all, you talk about reversion which is very impt, could I benefit from a split pulse manifold and housing?

Summary:

GT28rs with ATP 0.63

TiAl gate 46mm

Split pulse equal length 1 1/4 inch manifold

Split pulse housing

Heeps of torque really early and 330rwhp?

Add more to the equation of need be please...

Last question of all, since this thread is about matching turbine to compressors...why do you not recommend the 52 and 56 trims and only the 48t in the gt2871r???

Also, why just the 0.86 housing?

There are a few on nissansivlia who make 320-340rwhp at low boost (ie 15psi) on srs using the 56t gt2871r with 0.63 housing.....take this into consideration when asnwering cause from evertying I have ever read from you (which i appreciate), it contradicts what you have said and im confused as hell now :)

Thanks a lot

Boosted Frog

Edited by 180bfj20det

Disco,

Forgot to mention the HKS GT3040R-50T I have here has a T25 foot print.

The few customers I have that have GT28RS or similar already had them on there cars before they came to me. Most of my business is done with people that are chasing higher power out puts than the GT28RS can deliver on sensible boost.

The most impressive car I have seen with a GT28RS is a customers S14 200SX making very close to 300rwhp on a good day @ 6000rpm on 20psi and tons of torque from 3000rpm. Max rpm is 6200. No worth while power past this point. This 200SX has backed this power up by doing several 112mph - 113mph passes at WillowBank.

Most of my customers want more than 300rwhp and don't want to run more than 18psi. So even know the GT28RS is an absolutely awesome turbo it does not suit the majority of my customer basis.

Cheers,

:P

The test car I built my new SR20 turbo kit on is now finished. It uses the Billet Turbo combo I mentioned earlier using the 56T 71mm GT compressor wheel.

This car made 245rwhp on 10psi and 311rwhp on 16psi.

This means for me the turbo kit and the turbo combo is a success story.

can anyone tell me the specs on this turbo part no: 714569-5002

like is it the gt30/40 ?

The closest match I have to your part number is 714569-0002.

This turbo is a 52 trim T04S version of the GT30R's.

If it is this turbo it will have a .70 compressor cover,

7 bladed 52 trim T04S compressor wheel with an inducer size of 55.1mm and a major diameter of 76mm.

It will have a .82 rear housing (if it hasn鈥檛 been changed) and the standard 84 trim 60mm GT30R turbine.

Disco may have an exact match to your part number if this is not your turbo.

The easiest way to check would be to count the compressor blades and measure the compressor inducer size, then cross reference it with the information supplied.

Cheers :)

Yep thats the one , Turbo number 714569-0002 = cartridge no 700177-0018 =

GT30/TO4S 52T and being -0002 should have .82 a/r turbine housing if unaltered .

-0001 = 1.06 and -0003 = .63 a/r .

Cheers A .

Edit : I may be wrong here , have conflicting information as to which of these two has the 7/14 blade 82mm compressor . Could be either 700177-13 or 700177-0018 though the -18 is more likely .

Need to remove the compressor cover and measure the major diametre and count the blades . The smaller front or inducer diametre would be good so we can work out the approximate trim no .

Cheers A .

Edited by discopotato03

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hello, just just bought an 1999 enr34 with a stock rb25neo and I'm looking to upgrade the engine to 500whp I know some basic things but wondering if there are things I'll need to do to upgrade the stock block and all the bits and pieces to achieve this.
    • Thanks everyone for the replies and suggestions. Got the seats out (hoping I could find some existing grommets but no such luck). By tapping and measuring etc. I could figure out where I could drill through if needed. But first I borrowed an inspection camera and managed to go through factory holes in the chassis rail and could see that the captive nut was holding steady which is why it could retighten. So it was indeed a stripped section of thread, so I applied downforce by levering the bolt head with a screwdriver and went slowly back and forth until it came out. Camera helped a lot cos I could monitor that the captive nut was holding tight. Now I just have one very seized main subframe nut to tackle 馃槄
    • BOVs do have a purpose, if you ever log pressure before and after the throttle body, you will see a spike pre throttle on lift off from a WOT condition. Enough to bend throttle blades / damage e-throttle motors or simple assist in blowing off cooler pipes. FWIW, the above on really applies to those running at least 2 bar of boost. OP shouldn't have an issue, on the other hand, here are some videos of my shit box over a decade ago with some succulent dose with the airbox on and off. That shit box is unrecognisable these days 馃珷    
    • I've tried all different combinations of BOVs/ no BOV and stock bypass valves over the years, on gear changes the stock bypass valve seems to get the car back on boost quicker because in part the turbos wheel speed isn't being slowed down by reversion, although they have issues holding boost much over the stock setting. Most aftermarket BOVs you can adjust the spring, tighter will make it open later and close sooner, but in my experience it'll cause a bit of flutter at low load/rpm anyway. I've also got some input into this whole no bov causing turbo wear, never had an issue on any on my turbos HOWEVER, I got my R33 GTST with 200k kms on it, with from what I can see still has the original turbo, no lateral shaft play but has about 4-5mm of play in and out which to me seems like a worn thrust bearing from years (100-150k kms?) of turbo flutter running no bov, so maybe there is some truth to it in the long run. But that'll never stop me loving the Stutututu while I have the car.   OP just wants to know if he can run a atmo vented BOV with no major issues and the answer is YES, plenty of people do it, there's no harm in installing it and seeing how it runs before spending $$$ on an aftermarket ecu, last time I bought a Nistune it was $2400 for install and a tune , unsure of todays prices but you get me. Crazy money to spend just to fix the minor inconvenience of stalling that can be overcome by letting the revs come down to near idle before putting the clutch in or a little bit of throttle to avoid it. You're better off leaving the ecu and tune for after a bigger turbo/injectors have been installed to take full advantage of the tune and get your moneys worth.   Let OP have his Whoosh sound without trying to break his bank haha
    • I see you missed the rest of the conversation where they have benefits, but nothing to do with avoiding breaking turbos, which is what the aftermarket BOV made all the fan boys, tuners, and modders believe was the only purpose for them...
  • Create New...