Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

A few items I need to get rid of as they have been sitting in my garage for over 1 year.

Items

1 x Black/Red and plain Red recaro replicas.

Made with proper steel frame and injection moulded foam. I use a similar pair in my R33 with harnesses at tracks with team wang.

red-black%20recaro.jpg

recaro%20red%20set.jpg

$600 for either pair

Location:

Melbourne

Item Condition:

All new

Reason for Selling:

Taking up 2 much room in my garage

Price and Payment Conditions:

Prices in thread.

Extra Info:

Contact Details:

email me at [email protected]

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/102914-a-few-bits-and-pieces/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hey mate, do they have rails or do they fit straight onto r33 rails?? Do they have the proper recliner set up for a coupe?? What adjustments dot hey have? height. lumber etc. Are they comfortable? How do they compare to a standard GTST seat?

Hey mate, do they have rails or do they fit straight onto r33 rails?? Do they have the proper recliner set up for a coupe?? What adjustments dot hey have? height. lumber etc. Are they comfortable? How do they compare to a standard GTST seat?

This is the pair I have in my R33. They come with generic rails.

skyline%20recaro%201.jpg

skyline%20recaro%202.jpg

I ended up getting a pair of bride rails suited for an R33 from a jap importer and then modifying the bolt locations on them to suit the seat as the floorpan under the seat area on the skyline is at all different levels so its a bitch to modify other rails to suit. Another problem is that the stock rails have the seat belt buckle as apart of the rails also. The bride rails went straight in with new belt buckle etc.

They recline so you can get into the back seat. Thats the only adjustments they have and are very comfortable and hold you in nicely.

drift monkys

If i sell you just the drivers side, then I will be stuck with a passenger side that no one usually is looking to buy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Structured text and other high level PLC programing languages are not allowable in Functional Safety. They are very difficult to audit. My PLC stuff is almost exclusively oriented towards Burner Management Systems which are a particularly pernicious form of Safety Instrumented System, when implemented in an SPLC. Even the part of the code written to work in the non-safety logic part of the PLC, like with a Siemens S7-1500 series, still needs to be treated as if it was safety code, with access restrictions, code fingreprints and the like. And Allen Bradley can go EABODs. They ae full of shit. They have this whole lie going on where they say if you use a ControlLogix controller and its IO, and then just duplicate the IOs (ie, run in series or parallel depending on type, to try to make it "fail safe") and "use these programming styles and place these restrictions on what you do" that you can achieve SIL2. What a load of crap. They just get away with it because no-one in the US seems to understand the first thing about Functional Safety and carries on as if all they have to do is buy only SIL2 rated equipment and hey presto, it's a SIL2 system. Idiots. /rant
    • If you're really considering leaving it, a great question to ask is, is the magnet going to stick to the sump? The answer to the above is the same answer towards if I'd have any level of comfort leaving it... Personally, based on the cost of a motor if the magnet were to cause damage, I'd be fishing it out either way. Use the methods in here. It fit in through the plug hole, it'll come out.   PS, get a small actuatable claw for a bore scope. OR if you know a vet, they have really cool controllable scopes with hooks on the end. Supposedly they're like playing a video game. Ask if they can acquire you one of their scopes... Engine oil after all is just a different type of lube right? Will only make it easier on the next dog or cat...
    • All other (Boolean) logic functions though, are just built on those blocks above. Which does give you a lot of functionality in logic. It is basing that on using thresholds with analogue signals like GTS alluded to.   Not having things like timers will make it less useful for some of the ramp up logic you'd want, and again, on Haltecs capacity specifically, I'm not across anymore what you can / can't do with different tables.   I'm assuming, with your logic you want to implement, not only do you want your timing safeties, you're wanting to be able to derive the duty cycle for your solenoid, to maintain I'm assuming 175PSi? Or are you using a standalone WMI controller to maintain the DC correct, and you just want the Haltech working out which fuelling maps you should be on?
    • It doesn't seem to follow revs. Oddly it seems to follow TPS a little bit from what I can see, but with some delay a bit. IE end of the graph, when he lets off throttle fully, pressure drops a lot, then slowly builds back up, but rpm is on a nice cruisey drop off. I do agree though, it seems very electrically.
    • I just try to entirely stay away from ladder now unless it's something basic maintained by electricians. Even then and to your point, it mostly ends up being blocks I wrote in structured text.  PLC's are slowly going towards C, C++ and C#. I just wish Allen-Bradley would jump on the bandwagon. 
×
×
  • Create New...