Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 717
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  shif_tea said:
yeah he got 265rwkw with nos, between 4000 and 4200 rpm he went from 120rwkw to 235 rwkw!!!! Near vert curve. Crazy.

Nah i didn't talk to ya, but saw u wandering round a few times. I wanna buy the top secret gtr :D

Then put a small projectile in the exhaust and watch it fly away into someone's windscreen as your taking off.

:/

1994 R32 GTR

76,000km

HKS 2530's @ 20psi

260 Poncams

= 301rwkw

I have a feeling the dyno was abit conservative but anyhow it was a great day (even though a touch hot).

post-1296-1142074549.jpg

Edited by benm

Just had a look at Stan's dyno graph - from the SATANIC. Very surprising to see that UAS backed off the run before it even ended... meant that peak power wasn't even reached??? The dyno graph just went vertically downwards at the end, power curve hadn't even started to dip yet.

Anyone else see this on their graphs or was it just Stan's?

Firstly a big thank you to Adam for putting this together. :/

Also to John and the staff at UAS for running the show.

Very happy with my boat, managed 261.3 rwkw @ 16psi.

Originally had boost set at 19psi,

but I wanted to know how she would go at a friendlier level. :D

Plenty of tough liners there today, some real good numbers.

So who's going to WSID?

  benm said:
1994 R32 GTR

76,000km

HKS 2530's @ 20psi

272 Poncams

= 301rwkw

I have a feeling the dyno was abit conservative but anyhow it was a great day (even though a touch hot).

Mate I had bit of a sticky beak at your GTR when it was waiting in line - all your odometer numbers line up nicely leading me to believe it is a genuine 76,000km? Nice :D

I'm *know* my odometer is a genuine 74,000km :D on the plus side I know for sure the boost restrictor is still in. :/ Comforting.

Just had a look at Stan's dyno graph - from the SATANIC. Very surprising to see that UAS backed off the run before it even ended... meant that peak power wasn't even reached??? The dyno graph just went vertically downwards at the end, power curve hadn't even started to dip yet.

Anyone else see this on their graphs or was it just Stan's?

If I recall his A/F ratios were running a little to lean to push it too much farther.. was a good run.. could have held on a little longer, got a video of it here.. I think the main issue with power was his boost dropping off 1psi..

anyways.. good day.. stuck round for a bit.. than left.. stupid whining gearbox.. shits me to tears now sounds like i'm running a dogbox or something..

Edited by Links
  PORTS said:
Firstly a big thank you to Adam for putting this together. :/

Also to John and the staff at UAS for running the show.

Very happy with my boat, managed 261.3 rwkw @ 16psi.

Originally had boost set at 19psi,

but I wanted to know how she would go at a friendlier level. :D

Plenty of tough liners there today, some real good numbers.

So who's going to WSID?

So who won STD turbo GTS-t......

also...who won overall and the reg.?

  benm said:
1994 R32 GTR

76,000km

HKS 2530's @ 20psi

272 Poncams

= 301rwkw

I have a feeling the dyno was abit conservative but anyhow it was a great day (even though a touch hot).

your poncams are 260...i fitted em.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...