Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, i'm looking into perhaps buying an R32 GTR later on in the year, and i'm currently looking into what's available and what I should be looking for. I've had a look at some ads and seen the term 'suicide switch' thrown around. Now, as far as I know (not very far, but still) the GTR's are constant 4WD. There wasn't much information, but the general gist I got was that this particular GTR had a switch where you could switch between full 4WD and RWD. My previous understanding was that it was possible to stop the power going to the front wheels, but only by stuffing around with some of the drivetrain mechanics.

I don't want to waste too much of your time with newb questions, so in short, what i'm looking to confirm is:

- The R32 GTR is constant 4WD?

- Is it possible (with the right electronics knowledge) to build in one of these 'suicide switches' that allows you to manually enable/disable the front wheels at will?

Thanks ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103454-qs-regarding-r32-gtr-drive/
Share on other sites

None of the GT-Rs are constant 4WD. They're only 4WD on demand.

The difference between a GT-R and your average "part time 4WD" shitbox is that, when its not in 4WD, the GT-R drives the right set of wheels for a sports car.

On an R32, pulling a fuse will disable the ATTESSA from working. So you could quite easily install a switch to do the same thing.

Ok, i've done a bit more reading, just to make sure I understood it...

By default, the GT-R will send the torque to the rear wheels only? When the ATTESA ecu detects slip on one of the rear wheels, it then re-distributes some torque to the front wheels to keep the car under control (Thus creating 4WD)?

Hate to be a pest, but I was having one of those stupid little arguments about it and somehow we ended up with $20 on the table, so I need to be 100% sure ^_^

That's a very generalised way of looking at it..

not only does it look at slip - but current speed, angle of the steering wheel, Throttle, and probably another couple of things than it engages the front wheels..

the R34 are alot smarter and tend to predict what you are going to do..

go take one for a test drive.. see how it goes, watch the torque gauge..

Awesome. So it really just looks at multiple factors and enganges the front wheels when it thinks it's necessary.

I was thinking about test-driving one, but i'm not buying that soon and I don't like to waste people's time.

Anyway, thanks for the help guys, I think i've got it understood now. Yay.

Thanks Links. I'd forgotten about that (too long since I looked up or talked about ATTESSA).

Aside from detecting slip, the car knows from its other sensors where in a corner you are.

Assuming you have traction all the way through the corner:

On the straight its RWD. Under brakes and on turn-in its still RWD, which preserves its response and steering feel as the front wheels are not being corrupted by torque.

Once you pass the apex and get back on the power, the ATTESSA will funnel some torque to the front to pull you out of the corner, even if you have full traction. That will let you feed more power on as well as well as improve the power split to keep the car neutral as the rear tyres aren't being overwhelmed by demands on it.

Its all about maximising the amount of grip all four tyres can offer you by only putting torque to them when you can and when its needed.

I could write a longer post on it if you want, but you'd be just as well served Googling for it.

- Is it possible (with the right electronics knowledge) to build in one of these 'suicide switches' that allows you to manually enable/disable the front wheels at will?

Thanks  :)

I have an old Japanese GTR video that shows 2 R32 GTR's partially enabling the front wheels using a switch (for a drag). Its all in Japanese so I don't know what they are on about but with the right electronic mind and skill you can enable the front wheels permanently.

The 2 GTR's 'front torque guage' needle peaked at different levels so theres obviously a fair bit of knowledge needed to get it where you want it....but I guess it can be done :D

It works off a variety sensors. And, just like plugging in an SAFC to do light tuning on your ECU, if you modify the signal the ATTESSA controller gets from those sensors you can control the way it behaves.

Well I was only really referring to enabling/disabling the whole attessa system (turning the GTR into a constant RWD), but turning it into a constant 4WD sounds more interesting...

Would permanently enabling the front wheels have any disadvantages as far as traction or the genaral handling are corncerned? Power output would also be the same, only spread over all 4 wheels, yes?

Maybe I should stop pestering people on forums and go do some research myself, hehe :P

Mmmm, having done a bit of reading on how everything works, it seems stupid to try to change it at all. I'm gonna have to take one for a test drive when I get closer to a purchase (have a small loan that needs to be paid off first), but i'm pretty much sold. The challenge will be to find a fairly stock one in decent condition.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...