Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

when I installed mine on my R32, i noticed a big difference, but it could have been my imagination.

Apparently rear suspension isn't effected greatly by a strut bar, because most of the suspension compnents are bolted on to the subframe rather than the chassis (whilst skyline front suspension is connected to chassis)

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y19/merli...ar_rear_R32.jpg

Edited by MerlinTheHapyPig
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103550-rear-strut-bars/#findComment-1904463
Share on other sites

i put front and back on at the same time on my 32 but noticed a difference dont no which one did it but im happy with them, i want to get the cusco add on to the rear strut the connects to the floor aswell!!

if you havent got a front one already goto homerules(ns) 300 for front and back cusco bargain!

post-16065-1138450492.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103550-rear-strut-bars/#findComment-1905375
Share on other sites

The major benefit in suspension rigidity from a strut brace occurs when it links the upper control arm inner mounting points to each other. The strut brace then effectively doubles the strength and helps to preventing unwanted dynamic changes in camber.

This is a picture of the front suspension (R34GTR in this case, however R32/33 are much the same). As you can see, there is no subframe linking the upper arms, they are bolted to the inner guards (the chassis). So linking the shock tops (on the inner guards) with a strut brace, effectively links the inner joints on the upper control arms;

R34_GT_R_Front_Suspension.jpg

Contrast this with the rear where the rear subframe already very effectively links the inner joints on the upper control arms. Noting that the arms are not bolted to the chassis at all, they are in fact bolted directly to the subframe;

R34_GT_R_Rear_Suspension.jpg

Consequently adding a high mounted rear strut brace adds very little (if any) rigidity to the upper control arm mounting points.

There is a very small (in fact tiny) argument that could be put that says the rear strut brace adds to the overall rigidity of the chassis. But the pivot joints on the strut bar where it joins to the tops, makes even this small this benefit negligible.

The bottom line, a front strut is a very useful device on R32/3/34, and should be a must have on your list of handling improvements. A rear strut brace is, in my opinion, a far bit lower on the priorities list and for road arguably shouldn’t be on the priorities list at all.

:P Cheers :(

Edited by Sydneykid
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103550-rear-strut-bars/#findComment-1908538
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
i saw a dude in a S12 and he just had one of those racheting straps between the struts and he just tightned it up with the rachet.

dunno if it worked, but you could try it before you went out and bought one.

backyard styles.

woah ..... that is ridiculous

he is tightening the 2 struts together ... why?

the point of the strut brace is to minimise the struts movement inwards and outwards

this thing would only stop them flexing "outwards" but when the force of a corner pushes on the strut it would have no effect whatsoever..

do not bother with this IMHO

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103550-rear-strut-bars/#findComment-1938066
Share on other sites

Nice technical explanation as always SK.

Btw what about a McPherson strut type at the front? Like the ones from an S13-S15 etc. Do they benefit much from a strut brace? (Seeing as the struts are shallowly angled into the body)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103550-rear-strut-bars/#findComment-1942260
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...