Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I haven't reallly had a chance to have a good look under the wagon (no garage or driveway) until today. I was just adjusting my side skirt to make it fit a bit better, and stuck my head under the car for a good look.

Everything is really clean, no damage, scratches, etc. Then had a look at my exhaust.

It look like it is 3" all the way along. Is this standard? I know it has a NISMO rear muffler, so was wondering if the Japanese owner also replaced the system.

It doesn't look new, and it looks professionally done (ie no crappy welds).

Any ideas?

P.S. When I bought it it did feel a little more responsive than the other Stageas I tested. Could this be why?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103581-quick-question/
Share on other sites

2.5 is stock. And stock unit will prolly have 'calsonic' stamped on it somewhere.

Also the stock unit will have three rubber weights attached at various points along the length of the pipe to help eliminate vibrations.

So if it is 3' with no harmonic balancers, then it def aftermarket, and will do lots for your power.

Check the dump pipe leading up to the cat - is it a different size?

If the same, the you're in luck and someones done the expensive work for you.

If not the same - ie the front half upto the cat is 2.5 inch then getting this enlarged along with a 3' cat will do even more for your mid range grunt.

P.S If the exhaust is stock it will be so quiet, at some stage since buying it, you will have tried to start it only to find the engine is alread running.

Edited by 3intheBack
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103581-quick-question/#findComment-1905152
Share on other sites

No rubber weights anywhere on the exhaust, some on the back of the trans and rear suspension mountings.

Measured pipe, it is 2.5" all through.

Rear muffler has 'NISMO' stamped on it as well as 'Calsonic'.

You know when the car is running. It makes a deep, but still quite soft, 'burble' at idle. It sounds nice, not too loud.

So maybe non factory, but not top performance replacement.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103581-quick-question/#findComment-1905928
Share on other sites

No idea, never done it.

Cut it out, flange off the ends of the cutout and the exhaust, and get a flanged straight pipe put in. If it makes it too loud, put the mid muffler back in. If its too quite still, well, at least you did something.

Thats what i am tempted to do, its is a bit too quiet, but its still not horrible or anything.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103581-quick-question/#findComment-1906225
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...