Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys

looking at buyin a 32 just a few questions i need to ask about it

firstly the car has 156000 kms - i no rb20dets are tough but is this a little high? i do plan on making it a drift project car so should i be worried about this much km's?

secondly the car is auto, realisticaly using a rb20 box and clutch how much am i looking at for the conversion?

and lastly there is a weird noise coming from the engine, the owner told me it is the idler pulley? is this a common thing with rb20s? and how much to fix this? the owner thinks no more then $100?

thankyou very much for your help

steve

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/104756-r32-gtst-93-mspec-auto/
Share on other sites

156,000km could be high, but then again, if you looked at many other "76,000km" cars you'll find condition surprisingly similar <_< Most from japan have done somewhere from 150,000 -> 200,000km I tend to think by 15 years old, and so many seem wound back on the 32's (esp. the 89/90 ones).. So I'd just go on condition of the car, rather than just km. Don't forget all the bushes, suspension setup, etc, etc if you are going to do any motorsport with it -- that can add up to a lot to replace the bushes, get the right suspension setup, etc, etc in an old car.

Conversion to manual can vary.. but expect about $1000, and a real headf*ck finding all the little parts one by one. If you can get a wreck might be able to snap up a steal on the lot.

"Weird noise" can be anything from like idler pulley like you say, to engine bearings (i.e. rebuild time).. So get it checked out first to make sure it is actually minor. $100 is bullshit, thats what the part will cost itself- not the labour. I would expect around $400 for any workshop price to replace the idler bearing, as just to get to it will take a couple of hours. May as well then do timing belt as well... so really, will be up around $600 for that to be done by a mechanic (depending on where you go of course)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean this in no disrespect to u mate; Are there clear tagged examples/explanations in our SAU forum for example, in my interest, this is how to do R34 Gtt suspension the right way? U guys did so much taking risks with experimentation that deserves recognition and those results helps us morons take the RIGHT path to buy quality / buy once. 🍻
    • Pretty much what you'd expect at that power level. Hypergear turbo, long list of supporting mods, full Haltech catalogue, etc.  I'd say this goes for most drivers, suspension is still a dark art for most people. And it's really hard to convince someone how much better their setup could be...  
    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
×
×
  • Create New...